Photo of Bill Emmerson
R California Senate · District 23

Sen. Bill Emmerson

Compare
Total votes
18,837
all sessions
Attendance
92%
1,119 missed
Lower than 91% of chamber peers
With party
97%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
473
bills & resolutions
Higher than 83% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
473 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
473
Primary
140
Co-sponsor
333
This page
473
matching current filters
Primary AB 1021
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Food processing establishments: suspension.

Under existing law, the California Food Sanitation Act, which is administered by the State Department of Public Health, a food processing establishment is required to satisfy prescribed sanitation requirements for purposes of food safety. A violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would permit authorized agents of the department who identify conditions likely to result in illness or injury at a food processing establishment to immediately suspend the license or registration of the food processing establishment and order the food processing establishment to close immediately pending an administrative hearing. The bill would require the department to provide a licensee or registrant with a written notice that contains prescribed information about the suspension and administrative hearing.

Failed Feb 2, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 1016
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Energy: commission and department.

(1) Existing law establishes the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and the Electricity Oversight Board with jurisdiction related to energy matters. Existing law provides the Public Utilities Commission with jurisdiction over the certification of natural gas and electric facilities. Existing law also provides the Office of Planning and Research, the Department of General Services, and the Office of the State Architect with jurisdiction over certain energy-related matters. Existing law provides the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission with the jurisdiction over the certification of thermal powerplants. This bill would abolish the State Energy Resources and Conservation Commission and the Electricity Oversight Board. The bill would create the Department of Energy, headed by a Secretary of Energy, and would create the California Energy Board and the Office of Energy Market Oversight within the department. The bill would provide for the creation of various divisions and subdivisions as deemed necessary by the secretary. The secretary would be appointed by, and hold office at the pleasure of, the Governor, subject to confirmation by the Senate. The bill would require the Governor to appoint the initial secretary by January 31, 2011. The bill would authorize the Governor to appoint an Assistant Secretary of Energy who would serve at the pleasure of the Governor. The bill would require the department to create a legal subcommittee comprised of specified members to develop a single statewide position on litigation concerning energy matters. The bill would provide that the California Energy Board consists of the following members: the Secretary of Energy who would be the chair of the board, 4 members of the public with qualifications, as specified, appointed by the Governor and subject to confirmation by the Senate, the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, and the president of the California Public Utilities Commission. The Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, and the president of the California Public Utilities Commission would serve as ex officio, nonvoting members of the board. The bill would specify that the public members shall serve for a term of 4 years. The bill would require the board to nominate for appointment by the Governor a public adviser to the board who would serve for a 3-year term and may be removed upon the joint concurrence of 4 board members and the Governor. The bill would vest the Office of Energy Market Oversight with the powers, duties, responsibilities, obligations, liabilities, and jurisdiction of the Electricity Oversight Board and add to the functions of the office. The bill would vest the new department and the California Energy Board with the powers, duties, responsibilities, obligations, liabilities, jurisdiction, and rights and privileges of the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, as specified. The bill would transfer jurisdiction over the certification of thermal powerplants and grant jurisdiction over certification of specified solar nonthermal powerplants to the California Energy Board. The bill would also transfer jurisdiction of certain energy-related matters from the Office of Planning and Research, the Department of General Services, and the Office of the State Architect to the Department of Energy or the California Energy Commission, as specified. The bill would transfer all responsibilities with respect to the certification of certain electric transmission facilities from the Public Utilities Commission to the exclusive jurisdiction of the California Energy Board. The bill would require the Department of Energy, on or before January 1, 2012, in consultation with the Public Utilities Commission and the Independent System Operator, to submit to the Governor and the Legislature a strategic plan identifying administrative and statutory measures that would improve the siting and licensing process for electric transmission lines. (2) Existing law requires a person proposing to construct a thermal powerplant or electric transmission line on a site to submit to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission a notice of intention to file an application for the certification of the site. This bill would repeal this requirement. (3) Existing law prohibits the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission from certifying a facility that adds generating capacity to a potential multiple facility site in excess of the maximum allowable capacity determined by the commission. This bill would repeal this prohibition. (4) Existing law requires the Department of Community Services and Development to administer federal funds for programs to provide energy assistance to qualified low-income households and to administer the community services block grant program. This bill would transfer the above-described duties and responsibilities of the Department of Community Services and Development, on and after January 1, 2013, to the Department of Energy. (5) Existing law established the Katz Safe Schoolbus Clean Fuel Efficiency Demonstration Program to assist local educational agencies in replacing older schoolbuses with schoolbuses meeting federal safety standards that operate with greater efficiency and fewer adverse air emissions. This bill would repeal this program. (6) Existing law establishes the Small Business Energy Efficient Refrigeration Program and the State Solar Medallion Passive Design Competition. This bill would repeal the program and competition. (7) The bill would make conforming changes in existing law. (8) The bill would provide that the provisions of the bill are severable.

Failed Feb 2, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1248
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Domestic violence: refusal to testify.

Existing law prohibits a court from imprisoning or otherwise confining or placing into custody the victim of a sexual assault or a domestic violence crime for contempt of court when the contempt consists of refusing to testify concerning the sexual assault or domestic violence crime. This bill would authorize the court to require a victim of a domestic violence crime who refuses to testify to attend one session of counseling and schedule a hearing to take place after the counseling session to determine whether the victim's decision not to testify was made freely and voluntarily and without coercion. The bill would authorize the district attorney to refer the victim to a nonprofit counseling group for purposes of that provision.

Failed Feb 2, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1119
died · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Works of improvement: payments.

Existing law requires an owner of a private work of improvement to release retention proceeds withheld from any payment within 45 days after the date of completion. Existing law requires a public entity to release retention proceeds withheld from any payment by the public entity within 60 days after the date of completion. Existing law requires an original contractor to pay any subcontractor within 10 days from the time that all or any portion of retention proceeds are received by the original contractor. Existing law requires an original contractor or subcontractor to pay any subcontractor within 10 days from the time of receipt of each progress payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing. Existing law imposes a penalty of 2% on the amount due per month on funds that are improperly withheld in a contract dispute relating to public and private works of improvement, as specified. Existing law requires any person or corporation that has contracted to do business with a public utility to pay any subcontractor within 15 working days of receipt of each progress payment from the public utility, except as specified. Existing law also requires a state agency that fails to make any progress payment within 30 days after receipt of the payment request to pay interest at the rate of 10% per year. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to reconsider prompt payment statutes regarding public and private works of improvement to aid in their clarity and application.

died Feb 2, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 163
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Amino acid-based elemental formulas.

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. This bill would require specified health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the use of amino acid-based elemental formulas, regardless of the delivery method, for the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, as defined, when the prescribing physician has issued a written order stating that the amino acid-based elemental formula is medically necessary. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions relative to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Failed Feb 2, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 418
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Pharmacy technicians: licensure requirements.

Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians by the California State Board of Pharmacy. Existing law authorizes the board to issue a pharmacy technician license to an individual if that individual is a high school graduate or possesses a general educational development certificate equivalent and has either obtained a specified associate's degree, completed a specified course of training, graduated from a specified school of pharmacy, or is certified by the Pharmacy Technician Certification Board. This bill would instead, on and after January 1, 2013, authorize the board to issue a pharmacy technician license to an individual who has graduated from a school of pharmacy recognized by the board, or to an individual who is a high school graduate or possesses a general educational development certificate equivalent, passes a pharmacy technician examination recognized by the National Organization for Competency Assurance and approved by the board, and has either obtained an associate's degree in pharmacy technology or completed a course of training specified by the board.

Failed Feb 2, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 719
In committee · California Senate · Co-sponsor
State agency Internet Web sites: information.

Existing law imposes specified duties on state agencies and provides for public access to government records. This bill would require each state department and agency to develop and operate a searchable Internet Web site accessible by the public that includes specified information relating to expenditures of state funds, defined to include, among other things, contracts, grants, purchase orders, subcontracts, and tax refunds, rebates, and credits.

In committee Feb 1, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 120
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Healing arts: peer review.

Existing law provides for the professional review of specified healing arts licentiates through a peer review process conducted by peer review bodies, as defined. This bill would encourage a peer review body to obtain external peer review, as defined, for the evaluation or investigation of an applicant, privilegeholder, or member of the medical staff in specified circumstances. This bill would require a peer review body to respond to the request of another peer review body and produce the records reasonably requested concerning a licentiate under review, as specified. The bill would specify that the records produced pursuant to this provision are not subject to discovery, as specified, and may only be used for peer review purposes. Existing law requires the governing body of acute care hospitals to give great weight to the actions of peer review bodies and authorizes the governing body to direct the peer review body to investigate in specified instances. Where the peer review body fails to take action in response to that direction, existing law authorizes the governing body to take action against a licentiate. This bill would prohibit a member of a medical or professional staff from being required to alter or surrender staff privileges, status, or membership solely due to the termination of a contract between that member and a health care facility, except as specified. The bill would specify that a peer review body is entitled to review and make timely recommendations to the governing body of a health care facility, and its designee, if applicable, regarding quality considerations relating to clinical services when the selection, performance evaluation, or any change in the retention or replacement of licensees with whom the facility has a contract occurs. The bill would require the governing body to give great weight to those recommendations. Existing law provides various due process rights for licentiates who are the subject of a final proposed disciplinary action of a peer review body, including authorizing a licensee to request a hearing concerning that action. Under existing law, the hearing must be held before either an arbitrator selected by a process mutually acceptable to the licensee and the peer review body or a panel of unbiased individuals, as specified. Existing law prohibits a hearing officer presiding at a hearing held before a panel from, among other things, gaining direct financial benefit from the outcome. This bill would additionally require the hearing officer to be an attorney licensed in California, except as specified, and to disclose all actual and potential conflicts of interest, as specified. The bill would specify that the hearing officer is entitled to determine the procedure for presenting evidence and argument and would give the hearing officer authority to make all rulings pertaining to law, procedure, or the admissibility of evidence. The bill would authorize the hearing officer to recommend termination of the hearing in certain circumstances. Existing law gives parties at the hearing certain rights, including the right to present and rebut evidence. Existing law requires the peer review body to adopt written provisions governing whether a licensee may be represented by an attorney and prohibits a peer review body from being represented by an attorney where a licensee is not so represented, except as specified. This bill would give both parties the right to be represented by an attorney but would prohibit a peer review body from being represented if the licensee notifies the peer review body within a specified period of time that he or she has elected to not be represented, except as specified. The bill would also provide that it shall become operative only if SB 820 is also enacted and becomes operative.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 249
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Health facilities: marking patient devices.

Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities, including long-term health care facilities, by the State Department of Public Health. Violation of these provisions constitutes a misdemeanor. Existing law also requires long-term health care facilities to implement a theft and loss program, as specified, including a written patient personal property inventory. This bill would require, as part of the written patient personal property inventory in long-term health care facilities, a listing, by a unique identification number, of all patient-owned mobility, hearing, or breathing equipment, including, but not limited to, canes, walkers, wheelchairs, hearing aids, and oxygen equipment. Because the bill would create a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 623
Vetoed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Architects: continuing education.

Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of persons engaged in the practice of architecture by the California Architects Board. Existing law requires a person licensed to practice architecture to complete, as a condition of license renewal, coursework regarding disability access requirements, as specified, to certify that completion, and to provide specified documentation to the board. This bill would authorize the board to audit the records of a licensee, and, until January 1, 2015, require the board to audit at least 3% of the license renewals received each year, to verify completion of the coursework, and would, commencing with the 2-year license renewal cycle beginning January 1, 2013, require a licensee to provide the specified documentation only upon that audit. The bill would exempt a licensee from these coursework requirements for the licensee's first license renewal in certain circumstances. A licensee who violates these provisions would be subject to a specified civil penalty. The bill would require the board to submit, on or before January 1, 2019, a letter to the Legislature relating to these requirements. The bill would also authorize the board to require a licensee, as a condition of license renewal, to certify to the board that he or she has completed continuing education in, or relevant to, the practice of architecture in subjects relating to health, safety, and welfare. If the board imposes that requirement, the bill would require the board to adopt regulations establishing requirements relating to continuing education, authorize the board to audit the records of a licensee to verify completion of any continuing education requirements, and require an applicant for license renewal to verify completion of the requisite continuing education hours, as specified.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Showing 231 to 240 of 473 bills
Previous 1 … 23 24 25 … 48 Next