This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Sponsored bills
This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
(1) The Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Law imposes a tax of $0.18 per gallon on motor vehicle fuel, commonly referred to as gasoline. The Diesel Fuel Tax Law imposes a tax of $0.18 per gallon on diesel fuel. These revenues, after certain deductions for nonhighway fuel uses, are deposited in the Highway Users Tax Account. Approximately 13 of the revenues in the account are apportioned by various formulas to cities and counties, and most of the remaining revenues are deposited in the State Highway Account after specified transfers to the Bicycle Transportation Account and the State Parks and Recreation Fund. Under Article XIX of the California Constitution, the portion of fuel tax revenues that is derived from use in motor vehicles upon public streets and highways is restricted for expenditure on street and highway and certain mass transit guideway purposes, and up to 25% of these and other vehicle-related revenues that are available for street and highway purposes may be pledged or used for the payment of principal and interest on voter-approved bonds issued for those purposes. This bill would modify the apportionment of fuel tax revenues designated for street and highway and guideway purposes for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years. For those years, the bill would provide for 65% of revenues to be deposited in the State Highway Account and 25% to be deposited in the Transportation Debt Service Fund. Of the remaining 10% of revenue, additional fuel tax revenues would be transferred to the Transportation Debt Service Fund in an amount equivalent to 25% of vehicle weight fee revenues for the 2009–10 fiscal year only, certain amounts would be made available to the Bicycle Transportation Account and the State Parks and Recreation Fund, and the remaining revenues would be apportioned to cities and counties by certain formulas. (2) Existing law, pursuant to Proposition 116 of 1990, creates the Public Transportation Account as a trust fund in the State Transportation Fund, provides that revenues are to be deposited in that account from specified portions of the sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, and provides that moneys in the account are available for expenditure only for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes. Existing law creates the Mass Transportation Fund in the State Treasury and provides that for the 2009–10 to 2012–13 fiscal years all of the gasoline sales tax revenues commonly known as the "spillover" that would otherwise be deposited in the Public Transportation Account shall be deposited instead in that fund. Existing law specifies the transportation purposes that may be funded by the fund, including payment of debt service on transportation general obligation bonds by transfer of funds from the Mass Transportation Fund to the Transportation Debt Service Fund. Existing law creates the Transportation Debt Service Fund in the State Treasury for the purpose, among other things, of using transportation revenues rather than the General Fund for the payment of debt service on transportation bonds or to reimburse the General Fund in that regard. This bill, for the 2009–10 fiscal year, would provide that up to $225,044,000 from the Public Transportation Account may be used to reimburse the General Fund for current debt service payments on transit-related general obligation bonds and up to $101,826,000 from that account may be used to reimburse the General Fund for home-to-school transportation expenditures. The bill would also provide for transfer from the Mass Transportation Fund to the Transportation Debt Service Fund of any amount of the "spillover" funds received during the 2009–10 to 2012–13 fiscal years necessary to offset the cost of debt service payments made from the General Fund during any fiscal year for transportation-related general obligation bond expenditures. This bill would also authorize the Director of Finance to reimburse the General Fund, from revenues transferred to the Transportation Debt Service Fund from the Highway Users Tax Account, any amount necessary to offset the cost of debt service payments made from the General Fund during any fiscal year for transportation-related general obligation bond expenditures consistent with specified provisions of Article XIX of the California Constitution. (3) Existing law establishes the Aeronautics Account in the State Transportation Fund. Existing law imposes a per gallon jet fuel tax on aircraft jet fuel dealers and requires that the funds be deposited in the State Treasury to the credit of the Motor Vehicle Fuel Account in the Transportation Tax Fund. Existing law requires that moneys deposited to the credit of the Motor Vehicle Fuel Account attributable to the distribution of motor vehicle fuel for use in propelling an aircraft in the state be transferred to the Aeronautics Account in the State Transportation Fund. Existing law requires funds in the Aeronautics Account to be used to pay the Controller and the State Board of Equalization for their pro rata costs in carrying out the duties imposed on them by the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Law and to pay the Department of Transportation for the administration of the State Aeronautics Act. Existing law allows the remaining balance of moneys in the account to be used for preapproved eligible projects that are for airport and aviation purposes, to make allocations to public entities for the aquisition or development of airports if the department determines that it is feasible, and to allow the California Transportation Commission to provide local matching funds for federal Airport Improvement Program Grants. This bill would suspend these grants and funding programs for the 2009–10 fiscal year. The bill would require $4,000,000 to be transferred from the Aeronautics Account to the General Fund, upon the order of the Director of Finance. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2011. (4) Existing law, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds for various transportation purposes, including $2,000,000,000 for local street and road improvement, congestion relief, and traffic safety. Existing law requires a city or city and county that receives an allocation of those funds in the 2008–09 fiscal year to agree to encumber the funds before July 1, 2009. This bill would instead require a city or city and county that receives an allocation of those funds in the 2008–09 fiscal year to agree to encumber the funds before July 1, 2010. (5) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in consultation with transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, counties, and cities, to carry out long-term state highway system planning. Existing law authorizes the department, to the extent that it does not jeopardize the delivery of projects in the adopted state transportation improvement program, to prepare a project studies report for capacity-increasing state highway projects. Existing law requires the department to review project studies reports performed by an entity other than the department. Existing law authorizes a local entity to request the department to prepare a project studies report for a capacity-increasing state highway project that is being proposed for inclusion in a future state transportation improvement program. If the department determines that it cannot complete the report in a timely fashion, existing law authorizes the requesting entity to prepare the report. This bill would require the department to be reimbursed by a requesting entity for any work performed by the department when it reviews or prepares these project studies reports. (6) This bill would make other related changes. (7) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2009. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
(1) Existing law, the Marine Life Management Act of 1998, generally establishes a comprehensive plan for the management of marine life resources, and utilizes fishery management plans as the primary basis for managing the state's sport and commercial marine fisheries. Existing law requires the Department of Fish and Game to submit fishery management plans to the Fish and Game Commission for adoption or rejection and also requires the Director of Fish and Game to report annually in writing to the commission on the status of sport and commercial marine fisheries managed by the state and identify those fisheries that do not meet the sustainability policies set forth in the act. Existing law, the Marine Life Protection Act, establishes the Marine Life Protection Program to reexamine and redesign California's marine protected area system. Existing law requires the Fish and Game Commission to adopt a master plan that guides the adoption and implementation of the program. This bill would require the Natural Resources Agency to prepare an annual report regarding all private funds expended on implementing the Marine Life Protection Act and identify efforts made to secure similar funding for implementation of the Marine Life Management Act of 1998. The bill would require the department to submit a report to the Legislature by January 1, 2010, that addresses the implementation of the Marine Life Management Act of 1998 and the Marine Life Protection Act and the money in which implementation of the acts are being coordinated. This bill would state that members of the advisory committees established to advise the Secretary of Natural Resources, the commission, or the department on the Marine Life Protection Act and the Marine Life Management Act of 1998 are subject to the Political Reform Act of 1974 and the Bagley-Keene Opening Meeting Act. (2) Existing law prohibits the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment by any person in any river, stream, or lake of this state without a permit issued by the Department of Fish and Game. Under existing law, it is unlawful to possess a vacuum or suction dredge in areas, or in or within 100 yards of waters, that are closed to the use of vacuum or suction dredges. A violation of the permit requirement is a misdemeanor. The department is authorized to close areas otherwise open for dredging and for which permits have been issued if there is an unanticipated water level change and the department determines that closure is necessary to protect fish and wildlife resources. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations to implement certain of the vacuum or suction dredge equipment requirements and authorizes the department to issue regulations with respect to other requirements. Existing law requires that the regulations be adopted in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . CEQA requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The act exempts from its provisions, among other things, certain types of ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, and emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service. This bill would prohibit the use of any vacuum or suction dredge equipment in any river, stream, or lake until the director of the department certifies to the Secretary of State that (1) the department has completed an environmental review of its existing vacuum or suction dredge equipment regulations as ordered by the court in a specified court action, (2) the department has transmitted for filing with the Secretary of State a certified copy of new regulations, as necessary, and (3) the new regulations are operative. (3) Existing law requires the Director of Pesticide Regulation, in consultation with the State Department of Health Services and the State Air Resources Board, to evaluate the health effects of pesticides which may be or are emitted into the ambient air of California and which may be determined to be a toxic air contaminant which poses a present or potential hazard to human health. This bill would instead require the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, on behalf of the director, to conduct those evaluations. (4) Under existing law, upon completion of the evaluation, the director, in consultation and with the participation of the State Department of Health Services, is required to prepare a report on the health effects of the pesticide which may be determined to be a toxic air contaminant which poses a present or potential hazard to human health due to airborne emission from its use and to submit the report to a scientific review panel, which reviews the report and submits its written findings to the director. This bill would instead require the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, on behalf of the director and in consultation with, and with the participation of, the Department of Pesticide Regulation and the State Department of Public Health, to conduct those reports. This bill would also make various conforming and technical changes. (5) Existing law establishes the Toxic Substances Control Account in the General Fund. Existing law authorizes the moneys deposited in the account to be appropriated to the Department of Toxic Substances Control for specified purposes, including the administration of the Human and Ecological Risk Division, the Hazardous Materials Laboratory, and the Office of Pollution Prevention and Technology Development, all within the department. This bill would change the reference to the Hazardous Materials Laboratory to the Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, and specify that moneys deposited in the account also may be appropriated to the department for the administration of the successor organizations of the specified units of the department, and for the implementation of programs administered by those units or successor organizations. The bill also would authorize moneys in the account to be appropriated to the department for activities of the department related to pollution prevention and technology development, as specified. (6) Existing law requires the owner or operator of an underground petroleum storage tank, or other responsible party, to take corrective action, as defined, in response to an unauthorized release of petroleum from the tank. A person required to perform corrective action may apply to the State Water Resources Control Board for payment of specified portions of the costs of corrective action. Existing law establishes the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund in the State Treasury and authorizes the money in the fund to be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to pay those claims, and, among other things, for corrective actions undertaken by the board, a California regional water quality control board, or a local agency, and for the cleanup and oversight of unauthorized releases at abandoned tank sites. Existing law imposes certain petroleum storage fees upon the owner of an underground storage tank for which a permit is required and requires those fees to be deposited in the fund. This bill would increase a specified petroleum storage fee by $0.006 per gallon of petroleum stored, on and after January 1, 2010. By operation of existing law, the revenue resulting from the increase would be required to be deposited in the fund and be available, upon appropriation, for expenditure for the purposes authorized under existing law for money in the fund. (7) Existing law establishes the Underground Storage Tank Petroleum Contamination Orphan Site Cleanup Fund (fund) in the State Treasury until January 1, 2016, and transfers $10,000,000, for each of the 2008–09, 2009–10, and 2010–11 fiscal years, from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund to the fund, for expenditure, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the costs of response actions to remediate the harm caused by a petroleum contamination at a site that meets specified conditions. This bill would authorize available federal moneys to be deposited in the fund, and would require the amount transferred in a fiscal year to the fund from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund to be reduced by the amount of federal moneys deposited in the fund in that fiscal year. The bill would require that if an expenditure from the fund includes federal moneys deposited in the fund, the expenditure be consistent with all applicable requirements for expenditure of the federal moneys. The bill would specify that the State Water Resources Control Board is the entity expending moneys from the fund upon appropriation by the Legislature. (8) Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program known as the unified program. The unified program is required to consolidate the administration of specified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management requirements. The secretary is required to establish standards applicable to Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPAs) , participating agencies (PAs) , state agencies, and businesses specifying the data to be collected and submitted by unified program agencies in administering the specified requirements. Existing law requires the secretary, by January 1, 2010, to establish a statewide information management system capable of receiving all data collected by the unified program agencies and reported by regulated businesses, as specified. Existing law requires not less than 75% of specified funding to be provided to CUPAs and PAs through grant funds in the amounts determined by the secretary to assist those local agencies in meeting information management system requirements. This bill would require that funding to be provided through grant funds or statewide contract services, rather than only through grant funds. The bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes. (9) Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt regulations to achieve the maximum feasible reduction in volatile organic compounds emitted by consumer products, as defined, if the state board makes certain findings. Existing law makes it a crime to violate a nonvehicular pollution control law, as provided. Existing law requires the Director of Pesticide Regulation to develop control measures for certain pesticides designed to reduce emissions in order to protect public health. This bill would require the Department of Pesticide Regulation to adopt regulations to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from agricultural and commercial structural pesticides by 20% from the 1990 baseline inventory in the San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento metropolitan, southeast desert, Ventura, and south coast nonattainment areas. Because violations of the regulations would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The State Air Resources Board would be authorized to adopt regulations to require greater reductions, if the reductions are necessary to achieve applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The state board would be required to submit specified regulations to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for inclusion in the state implementation plan prepared in accordance with the federal Clean Air Act. (10) Existing law requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to have the primary financial responsibility for preventing and suppressing fires in areas that the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection has determined are state responsibility areas. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2010, to adopt emergency regulations to establish a fee to cover the cost of providing fire protection services associated with structures in state responsibility areas, based on the fire hazard severity zone in which a structure is located. The fee would be charged on each structure on a parcel that is subject to property taxes and is within a state responsibility area. The department would be required to adjust the fees annually, as specified. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to collect the fees commencing with the 2010–11 fiscal year, as prescribed. The bill would require, by January 1, 2010, and each January 1 thereafter, the department to transmit the appropriate names and addresses of persons who are liable for the fee and the amount of the fee to be assessed by the State Board of Equalization. The bill would establish the State Responsibility Area Fire Fund and would require the fees collected, except that portion retained by the State Board of Equalization, to be deposited into the fund and to be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for fire prevention and protection activities in state responsibility areas and attributable to benefits conferred on structures subject to the fee, as well as covering startup costs and the costs of administration, as specified. The State Board of Equalization would be required to retain and expend, upon appropriation by the Legislature, the funds necessary to pay refunds and for its expenses incurred in collection. This bill would permit a person from whom a fee is determined to be due to use an appeals process and, if applicable, a refund process that would be established by the bill. (11) Existing law, the Wildland Fire Protection Management Act of 1978, authorizes the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection to enter into contracts, with the approval of the Director of General Services, for prescribed burning or other hazardous fuel reduction with the owner or any person who has legal control of any property or any public agency with regulatory or natural resource management authority over certain lands. The act authorizes the state to assume a proportionate share of the costs of site preparation and prescribed burning or other hazardous fuel reduction. This bill would change the term "contract" to "agreement," and would delete the requirement of approval by the Director of General Services. The bill would also authorize the director to accept grants and donations of equipment, materials, or funds from any source for the purpose of supporting or facilitating the prescribed burning or other hazardous fuels reduction work. The director would be authorized to waive the cost sharing requirements of the act if the funding source prohibits cost sharing requirements. (12) Existing law authorizes the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to enter into agreements and make loans to encourage private and public investment in, and improved management of, forest lands and resources within the state to ensure adequate future high-quality timber supplies, related employment and other economic benefits, and the protection, maintenance, and enhancement of a productive and stable forest resource system for the benefit of present and future generations. The Director of Forestry and Fire Protection is authorized to enter into agreements for forest resource improvement work with eligible landowners that require cost sharing on the part of the landowner and is required to deposit into the Forest Resources Improvement Fund funds from any source for forest resource improvement purposes. This bill would allow the department to waive the cost sharing requirement if the funding source for the authorized forest resource improvement work prohibits cost sharing requirements. This bill would prohibit any federal funds received as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act from being deposited into the Forest Resources Improvement Fund. (13) Existing law, the California Urban Forestry Act of 1978, authorizes the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to implement a program in urban forestry to, among other things, encourage better management and planting of trees in urban areas and assist cities in innovative solutions to problems, including greenhouse gas emissions, urban heat island effect, stormwater management, lack of green space, and vandalism. The director, with advice from other appropriate state agencies and interested parties, is authorized to make grants to provide assistance of 25 to 90% of costs for projects meeting guidelines established by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, upon recommendation by the director. This bill would allow the director to waive the cost sharing requirement if the funding source for a grant prohibits cost sharing requirements. (14) The Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, which regulates timber harvesting, contains legislative findings and declarations relative to forest resources, including a declaration that it is the policy of the state to encourage prudent and responsible forest resource management calculated to serve the public's need for timber and other forest products, while giving consideration to other specified public needs. The act requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to adopt district forest practice rules and regulations for each forest district. A willful violation of the act or a rule or regulation of the board is a crime. This bill would require the board to adopt regulations relating to timber harvesting that protect chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Because a willful violation of a rule or regulation adopted by the board pursuant to the bill would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (15) Existing law authorizes the issuance of environmental license plates, as defined, for vehicles, upon application and upon payment of certain fees. All revenue derived from the fees for issuance, renewal, retention, duplication, and transfer of the plates is required to be deposited in the California Environmental License Plate Fund in the State Treasury. This bill would increase the fees for issuance, renewal, retention, duplication, and transfer of the environmental license plates. (16) The Energy Conservation Assistance Act of 1979 (act) establishes the State Energy Conservation Assistance Account (account) , a continuously appropriated account, that is administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to provide grants and loans to various public entities to maximize energy use savings in existing and planned buildings and facilities. The act authorizes the commission to approve an application for a loan only in those instances where the applicant demonstrates that the costs of the project, plus interest on state funds loaned, will be recovered through savings in the cost of energy to the institution during the repayment period. The act authorizes the commission to make grants in an amount that does not exceed 5% of the annual appropriation from the account. The act authorizes the commission to expend funds from the account for the actual administrative costs to the commission in implementing the act in an amount that does not exceed 5% of the total appropriation. The act also requires, in specified circumstances, the commission to periodically set interest rates on loans based on surveys of existing financial markets and at rates not less than 3% per annum. This bill would authorize the commission to make grants in an amount that does not exceed 5% of, and to recover its administrative costs in an amount that does not exceed 5% of, the annual unencumbered balance in the account as determined by the commission on July 1 of each fiscal year. This bill would also require the commission to decrease the interest rate to not less than 1% per annum. The federal Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 establishes the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program to provide funds to the state to assist eligible entities in improving energy efficiency and reducing the total energy use of eligible entities. Existing law authorizes the commission to undertake certain actions and to administer a block grant program funded by the federal Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to reduce fossil fuel emission, improve energy efficiency, and reduce overall energy use. Existing law authorizes the commission to recover certain administrative expenses incurred in implementing the block grant program. Existing law prohibits the commission from expending more than 5% of the federal funds received for allowable administrative costs. This bill would authorize the commission to administer funds appropriated by the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program and to award contracts, grants, and loans for energy-related projects. The bill would additionally specify that the recoverable administrative costs include costs related, but not limited, to reporting, recordkeeping, and evaluation activities required by federal law, as well as implementing regulations and guidelines. The bill would authorize the commission to adopt guidelines implementing the block grant program and would subject the awarding of grants and loans to an appeal to the commission upon a showing that the award is based on factors other than those described in the guidelines. This bill would make an appropriation by requiring that the repayment of loans made in accordance with the federal acts be deposited into the account and used to make additional loans pursuant to above provisions. This bill would also establish in the State Treasury the Energy Efficient State Property Revolving Loan Fund. The money in the fund would be continuously appropriated to the Department of General Services for revolving loan funds for projects on state-owned buildings and facilities to achieve greater, long-term energy efficiency, energy conservation, and energy cost and use avoidance, to be allocated as specified. For the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009, the bill would require $25,000,000 to be transferred into the fund from money received by the commission pursuant to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. On or before January 1, 2010, and annually thereafter, the bill would require the department, in collaboration with the commission, to submit a report to the Legislature, containing specified information. The bill would require any repayment of loans made pursuant to this authority to be deposited into the fund, thereby making an appropriation. (17) The California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act, administered by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, among other things, defines terms and establishes the used oil recycling program. The act requires the board to deposit all revenues received pursuant to the act, in the California Used Oil Recycling Fund, part of which is continuously appropriated to the board to pay recycling incentives, to provide a reserve for contingencies, to make specified block grants for implementation of certain local used oil collection programs in a total amount equal to $10,000,000 or one-half the amount remaining in the fund after specified expenditures are made, for certain grants and loans, and for reimbursement for certain disposal costs of contaminated used oil. This bill would require the board, during fiscal years 2009–10 and 2010–11, to apply any necessary reductions to block grants in an equitable manner that takes into account prior year block grants that are held in reserves by local organizations as available resources for grantees to use in their operations. (18) Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources operates the State Water Resources Development System. This bill would require the department, on or before January 10, 2010, and annually thereafter, to prepare and submit to the fiscal committees of the Legislature a report that describes the budget of the State Water Resources Development System. (19) Existing law establishes the Central Valley Flood Protection Board, which is required to carry out specified flood protection functions. The board is required to consist of 9 members who meet specified requirements, except that existing law provides for the continuing service of board members holding office on December 31, 2007, until their successors are appointed and have been qualified to hold office. This bill would instead provide for the continuing service of the members of the board holding office on December 31, 2007, until January 1, 2010. (20) Existing law, the California Bay-Delta Authority Act, establishes in the Natural Resources Agency the California Bay-Delta Authority. The act requires the authority and the implementing agencies to carry out programs, projects, and activities necessary to implement the California Bay-Delta Program. The act requires the authority to develop policies and make decisions at program milestones, and to provide direction to achieve balanced implementation, integration, and continuous improvement in all program elements, including the science element. This bill would require the authority to post on its Internet Web site information relating to the awarding of grants that implement the science element of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. (21) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (22) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Existing law provides that the Insurance Commissioner, in cooperation with insurers, the Office of Emergency Services, and other emergency service agencies, shall establish procedures for the coordination of efforts between insurers and their representatives and those of emergency response agencies. This bill would create the Emergency Response Fund in the State Treasury. Insureds would be required to pay a special purpose surcharge at a rate of 4.8% (or as adjusted) on commercial and residential fire and multiperil insurance policies, including policies with combined property and liability coverage, issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2010, as specified. Funds from this surcharge would be available for appropriation by the Legislature to fund emergency activities, as defined, of the California Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and the Military Department. Any balance remaining in the fund at the end of a fiscal year would be retained and carried forward to the next fiscal year. This bill would require insurers collecting the surcharge to make a specified disclosure on the policy declarations page, billing statement, or a separate document accompanying the declarations page or billing statement. This bill would also require the Department of Insurance, the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and other state agencies and departments to cooperate and provide information to the California Emergency Management Agency as necessary to implement these provisions. The Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Law establishes, in lieu of any ad valorem property tax upon vehicles, an annual license fee for any vehicle subject to registration in this state. Under the California Constitution and existing law, the fees are deposited into the Vehicle License Fee Account of the Local Revenue Fund in the State Treasury for allocation to cities, counties, and cities and counties. This bill would additionally impose an annual surcharge in the amount of $15 on every vehicle subject to the VLF to sustain the operation and maintenance of the state park system, among other things. The bill would create the State Parks Access Fund in the State Treasury and would require that the $15 surcharge be deposited in this fund to be used for specified purposes by the Department of Parks and Recreation upon appropriation by the Legislature. The Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax Law imposes a tax of $0.18 per gallon of fuel and requires, if the federal fuel tax is reduced below the rate of $0.09 per gallon and federal financial allocations to this state are reduced or eliminated, that the tax rate be increased so that the combined state and federal tax rate per gallon equals $0.27. The Diesel Fuel Tax Law imposes a tax of $0.18 upon each gallon of fuel, as provided. This bill would eliminate those fuel taxes on October 1, 2009. The Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, the violation of which is a crime, imposes a tax on every distributor of cigarettes and tobacco products at specified rates, including additional taxes imposed under the Tobacco Tax and Health Protection Act of 1988 (Proposition 99) and the California Families and Children Act of 1998 (Proposition 10) . That law imposes a tax upon the distribution of tobacco products at a tax rate which is equivalent to the combined rate of all taxes imposed on cigarettes, which is deposited in specified accounts. This bill would, commencing on October 1, 2009, impose an additional excise tax on the distribution of cigarettes at the rate of $0.075 for each cigarette distributed, which would, under Proposition 99, impose an equivalent tax rate on the distribution of tobacco products. This bill would also impose a tax upon the distribution of tobacco products at the same equivalent tax rate, as specified. The bill would impose a floor stock tax and require a dealer or wholesaler to file a return with the State Board of Equalization showing the number of cigarettes in his or her possession or under his or her control on that date, as specified, and to remit the tax to the board. The revenues collected from the additional tax, except as specified, would be deposited in the General Fund. Because this bill would impose new requirements under the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Law, the violation of which is a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law imposes various taxes, including taxes on the privilege of engaging in certain activities. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill would impose an oil severance tax on and after October 1, 2009, upon any producer for the privilege of severing oil from the earth or water in this state for sale, transport, consumption, storage, profit, or use, as provided, at the rate of 9.9% (or as adjusted) of the gross value of each barrel of oil severed. The tax would be administered by the Department of Conservation and would be collected pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. The bill would require the department to deposit all tax revenues, penalties, and interest collected pursuant to these provisions into the General Fund. Because this bill would expand the scope of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
(1) Existing law, operative July 1, 2009, provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of law and in lieu of any license fee payable to the state prescribed for or referred to in specified provisions of the Horse Racing Law, any association or fair that conducts a racing meeting shall pay a license fee to the state to fund the California Horse Racing Board and the equine drug testing program, as provided. This bill would instead require any association or fair to pay its proportional amount, as determined by the formula devised by the board in consultation with the industry, as a license fee to the state, to be deposited into the Horse Racing Fund, which the bill would establish, to fund the board and the equine drug testing program, as provided. (2) Existing law, operative until June 30, 2009, provides that if the total amount paid to the state as license fees by racing associations and fairs is less than $40,000,000 in any calendar year, all associations and fairs that conducted live racing during the year of the shortfall shall remit to the state, on a pro rata basis according to the amount paid as license fees by each association or fair, the amount necessary to bring the total amount paid to the state as license fees to $40,000,000. This bill would provide that in lieu of all amounts payable prior to July 1, 2009, as shortfall amounts, the sum of $5,500,000 shall be paid by racing associations and fairs from the amount available for commissions, purses, and breeder awards, as determined by the board, into the State Treasury to the credit of the Fair and Exposition Fund over a period of 6 years, as provided. The bill would require the proportionate share to be paid by each racing association and fair and the method of payment to be determined by a formula approved by the board in consultation with the industry. By imposing new requirements on licensees under the Horse Racing Law, the violation of which would be a crime under other provisions of existing law, this bill would create a new crime and thereby impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Emergency Services Act provides for the assessment of certain state agency costs on utilities operating certain nuclear powerplants, and the deposit of those moneys into, and the appropriation and allocation of moneys from, the Nuclear Planning Assessment Special Account. The amounts available for disbursement are adjusted and compounded each fiscal year by the percentage increase in the California Consumer Price Index of the previous calendar year. These provisions become inoperative on July 1, 2019, and are repealed on January 1, 2020. This bill would instead make these adjustments based on the percentage increase in the California Consumer Price Index of the previous fiscal year. (4) Existing law requires the State Chief Information Officer to produce an annual information technology strategic plan. This bill would additionally require the State Chief Information Officer to produce an annual information technology report with specified information to be provided to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. (5) Existing law requires the Controller to install and operate a uniform state payroll system for all state agencies, except the California Exposition and State Fair and the University of California, in conformance with a prescribed accounting system. Existing law prohibits pay dates under that accounting system from being more than 10 calendar days following the close of the payroll period for monthly salaried employees and more than 15 calendar days following the close of the payroll period for semimonthly and biweekly payroll systems. Existing law provides that for the purposes of financial reporting, a payable exists when services have been delivered and the state is required to pay for those services, and an encumbrance exists when a valid obligation against an appropriation has been created. This bill would require, on and after January 1, 2010, that payments to employees made through the Uniform State Payroll System for a pay period ending on June 30 of each year shall be on or after July 1, provided that employees shall, in any event, be paid promptly. The bill would require that payments to employees made in July through the Uniform State Payroll System for services rendered prior to June 30 of each year be considered payable in the fiscal year in which the warrant is issued. The bill would except from this provision payments made in July for purposes of calculating maintenance of effort expenditures under Section 8 of Article 16 of the California Constitution and other calculations of funds used by a program in the fiscal year, and would permit them to be counted towards the prior fiscal year. (6) Existing law, known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the Williamson Act, authorizes a city or county, by contract, to limit the uses of land to agricultural uses or as an agricultural preserve in exchange for reduced property taxes. Existing law provides replacement revenues to local governments by reason of the reduction of the property tax on open-space lands assessed under specified provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Existing law continuously appropriates to the Controller from the General Fund a sum sufficient to make the payments required under those provisions. This bill would eliminate that continuous appropriation. (7) The Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act requires that premiums charged for enrollment in a health benefit program reasonably reflect the cost of the benefits, provided that this does not limit the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System from adjusting premiums charged under any health benefit plan or contract to reflect regional variations in providing services, which adjustments are at the sole discretion of the board. This bill would authorize the board to use reserves generated by one or more self-funded health benefit plans to reduce the premiums charged for enrollment in one or more separate self-funded health benefit plans offered by the board, as specified. (8) Existing law establishes, until December 31, 2011, the Rural Health Care Equity Program for the purpose of funding the subsidization and reimbursement of premium costs, deductibles, coinsurance, and other out-of-pocket health care expenses paid by employees living in rural areas, as specified. Existing law provides that the operation of the program is contingent upon funding in the annual Budget Act or another statute. Existing law provides that moneys remaining in an account of the program at the end of any fiscal year shall remain in the account for use in subsequent fiscal years, until the account is terminated and requires that moneys remaining in a program account upon its termination be deposited in the General Fund. State Bargaining Unit 5 has a labor contract with the state that is operative until July 2, 2010. This bill would provide that, contingent on funding in the annual Budget Act or another statute, the Rural Health Care Equity Program operates solely for the benefit of State Bargaining Unit 5. The bill would terminate operation of the program on July 3, 2010. The bill would require that any moneys that remain in the accounts of the program on July 1, 2009, other than moneys attributable to employees in State Bargaining Unit 5 on that date, be deposited in the General Fund. The bill would provide that, on and after July 3, 2010, benefits of the program would cease to be available to employees in State Bargaining Unit 5, and would require any moneys remaining in the accounts of the program be deposited in the General Fund. The bill would also make technical, corrective, and conforming changes to these provisions. (9) Existing law requires the local fire authority or the State Fire Marshal to conduct a facility preinspection upon request of a prospective community care facility licensee and authorizes the primary enforcement agency to assess preinspection fees not to exceed $50 for a facility with a capacity to serve 25 or fewer and fees not to exceed $100 for a facility with a capacity to serve 26 or more. This bill would, instead, authorize the assessed fees to equal, but not exceed, the actual cost of the preinspection services. (10) Existing law establishes the right of victims to be notified by the district attorney's office, in cases that involve a violent felony, as defined, or in the event of a homicide, the victim's next of kin, of a pending pretrial disposition before a change of plea is entered before a judge. Existing law provides that a victim of any felony may request to be notified, by the district attorney's office, of a pretrial disposition. The Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy's Law established, within the California Constitution, that victims, as defined, shall be entitled to certain rights, including the right, upon request, to be notified of and informed before any pretrial disposition of a case. This bill would amend statutory language to conform the notification rights of victims found in statute to the notification rights provided in the Constitution pursuant to the Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy's Law. (11) Under existing law, the Employee Housing Act requires that buildings used for human habitation, and buildings accessory thereto, comply with the building standards in the California Building Standards Code relating to employee housing, as defined. Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to gather and include specified information in an annual report for all employee housing owner and operator permittees for which it acts as the enforcement agency. This bill would, from July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2012, suspend the requirement that the department gather and include specified information in its annual report. (12) Under existing law, the department is required to establish a schedule of fees to pay for the cost of administration and enforcement of the Employee Housing Act. This bill would require the department to establish a schedule of fees that includes, but is not limited to, specified minimum permit fees. The bill would authorize the department, on or after January 1, 2010, to increase these specified fees, if necessary, to finance the costs of administration and enforcement of the act. (13) Existing law requires the California Housing Finance Agency to administer the California Homebuyer's Downpayment Assistance Program for the purpose of assisting first-time low- and moderate-income home buyers utilizing existing mortgage financing. Under the program, the amount of the downpayment assistance is due and payable at the end of the term or upon sale of or refinancing of the home. This bill would authorize the agency, in its discretion, to permit the downpayment assistance loan to be subordinated to refinancing if it determines that certain criteria have been met. The bill would authorize the agency to permit subordination on such terms and conditions as it determines are reasonable. (14) Existing law provides for the existence of the State Compensation Insurance Fund for the purpose of transacting workers' compensation insurance, insurance against the expense of defending any suit for serious and willful misconduct against an employer or his or her agent, and insurance to employees and other persons of the compensation fixed by the workers' compensation laws for employees and their dependents. This bill would authorize the Director of Finance, acting as agent for the state, to sell a portion of or otherwise obtain value for the State Compensation Insurance Fund assets and liabilities. It would provide that this sale or other disposition shall be transacted with an entity that the director, in consultation with the Treasurer, determines will meet specified conditions. It would require that the Board of Directors of the State Compensation Insurance Fund concur that the assets and liabilities identified by the Director of Finance are appropriate for disposition. This bill would specify the procedures applicable to the sale or other disposition of these assets and liabilities, and would require that the proceeds of any sale or any proceeds achieved through any other disposition of workers' compensation assets and liabilities, less transaction costs, be deposited into the General Fund. It would require the Director of Finance to notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee in writing upon determining that neither the sale nor any other transaction authorized by this bill is anticipated to achieve the purposes of the bill or upon the completion of a disposition of assets and liabilities pursuant to these provisions. (15) Existing law creates a Seismic Safety Account within the Insurance Fund, which may be appropriated by the Legislature to fund the Department of Insurance and the Seismic Safety Commission, as specified. Existing law imposes an assessment upon certain insurers to fund the account. This provision will remain in effect until July 1, 2009. This bill would extend the operation of the Seismic Safety Account until July 1, 2012. (16) The Mobilehome Parks Act requires the payment of a fee of $11 to the Department of Housing and Development at the time of original registration or renewal of registration for each transportable section of a manufactured home, mobilehome, or commercial coach that is subject to annual renewal, and, for a manufactured home, mobilehome, or truck camper that is not subject to annual renewal, at the time of original registration and upon application for specified subsequent changes. The act also requires the payment of a fee of $30 for each original application for registration of a floating home and for specified subsequent changes. This bill would raise to $23 the fee for the original registration or renewal of registration for each transportable section of a manufactured home, mobilehome, or commercial coach that is subject to annual renewal, and, for a manufactured home, mobilehome, or truck camper that is not subject to annual renewal, the fee for original registration and specified subsequent changes. The bill would also raise the fee for each original application for registration of a floating home and for specified subsequent changes to $42. (17) The Mobilehome Parks Act, until January 1, 2012, requires an annual operating permit fee of $25 and an additional $2 per lot, as specified. This bill would, until that same date, instead impose an annual operating permit fee of $140 and an additional $7 per lot, as specified. (18) The Mobilehome Parks Act, beginning January 1, 2012, requires an annual operating permit fee of $25 and an additional $2 per lot or camping party, as specified, and a temporary recreational vehicle park operating permit fee of $25, with no additional fee per lot. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2012, instead impose an annual operating permit fee of $140 and an additional $7 per lot, as specified, and would eliminate the fee for a temporary recreational vehicle park operating permit. (19) Existing law establishes the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations. Under existing law, the division enforces specified provisions of law relating to private employment. This bill would establish the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund in the State Treasury. The bill would provide that moneys in the fund may be expended by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the support of the activities that the division performs pursuant to specified provisions of law. The bill would require the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations to levy a separate surcharge upon all employers, as defined, for purposes of deposit in the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund. The bill would require that the total amount of the surcharges be allocated among employers in proportion to payroll respectively paid in the most recent year for which payroll information is available, and would require the director to adopt reasonable regulations governing the manner of collection of the surcharges. (20) Existing law authorizes the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service (CSMCS) within the Department of Industrial Relations to investigate and mediate labor disputes. This bill would authorize the Director of Industrial Relations to collect reimbursement for the services provided by CSMCS and would require the director to adopt regulations to implement these provisions. (21) Under existing law, workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy of a disaster service worker, or his or her dependents, for injury or death arising out of, and in the course of, his or her activities as a disaster service worker. Under that law, no compensation may be paid or furnished to a disaster service worker or the worker's dependent except from money appropriated for the purpose of furnishing compensation to disaster service workers and their dependents. Liability for the payment or furnishing of compensation is dependent upon and limited to the availability of money so appropriated. This bill would instead provide that workers' compensation may not be paid or furnished to a disaster service worker absent an initial appropriation of funds for that purpose, and that if appropriated funds are not available, the State Compensation Insurance Fund may provide compensation to an eligible claimant whose injuries have previously either been accepted or found to be compensable by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. The bill would require the California Emergency Management Agency to reimburse the fund when an appropriation becomes available. (22) Existing law provides for certain services, protections, and benefits for veterans. This bill would require that any entity, or other entities with which it subcontracts, that receives specified funding from the federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998, as provided in the 2009 Budget Act, identified for use for veterans, meet specified criteria, as prescribed. (23) Existing law provides for the establishment and operation of the Veterans' Home of California at various sites for aged and disabled veterans who meet certain eligibility requirements. Existing law establishes the total individual member's fees and charges for any fiscal year based on the level of care, which may not be greater than a specified percentage of the member's annual income or a flat amount, whichever is less. This bill would eliminate the requirement that the member's fees and charges for any fiscal year be the lesser of a percentage of the member's annual income or a flat amount, and instead prohibit the total of the member's fees and charges for any fiscal year to be greater than a certain percentage of the member's annual income. This bill would prohibit the total of the member's fees and charges for any fiscal year, for domiciliary care, to be greater than 4712%, and, for residential care for the elderly or assisted living, to be greater than 55%, of the member's annual income. This bill would require nonveteran spouses who become members of the home on or after July 1, 2009, to pay fees and charges based on the level of care, as specified, or an amount equal to the annual amount of federal per diem received for a veteran member in domiciliary care, whichever is greater, as provided. (24) The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law and the Transactions and Use Tax Law authorize local governmental agencies to impose sales and use taxes in modified conformity to state sales and use taxes and authorize the State Board of Equalization to impose charges in administering those local taxes. Existing law requires, beginning with the 2006–07 fiscal year, that the amount charged to each local governmental agency be determined in accordance with a methodology described in a specified report by the State Board of Equalization, as provided. This bill would, for the 2008–09 fiscal year to the 2014–15 fiscal year, inclusive, provide that the amounts determined in accordance with the methodology described in a specified report by the State Board of Equalization shall not include specified revenues. (25) Existing law establishes the Employment Training Panel (EPT) in the Employment Development Department, and prescribes the membership and functions and duties of the ETP. This bill would require the panel to establish the Partnership for Workforce Recovery Training (PWRT) for the purpose of supporting and implementing the workforce development goals set forth in the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) . The bill would require the panel to develop and publish guidelines for implementing the PWRT, as specified. The bill would authorize the panel to allocate funds it receives pursuant to the federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 and the ARRA to support the activities of the PWRT, in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require that any funds made available to the panel pursuant to those federal statutes be deposited into a separate account established by the Employment Development Department in the State Treasury, and used for the purposes of the PWRT. The bill would authorize the panel to adopt any regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the bill, as provided. (26) Existing law, the California Workforce Investment Act, establishes the California Workforce Investment Board (CWIB) , which is the body responsible for assisting the Governor in the development, oversight, and continuous improvement of California's workforce investment system, and prescribes the functions and duties of the board. Existing law, the California Green Collar Jobs Act of 2008, also establishes a special committee known as the Green Collar Jobs Council (GCJC) , which is responsible for the development of a green collar jobs strategic initiative to address the growing need for a highly skilled and well-trained workforce to meet the needs of California's emerging green economy, as prescribed. This bill would require the CWIB, in coordination with the Employment Development Department, to participate in the development and evaluation of specified grant allocations intended to provide funding to remove barriers for special needs populations for green technology and green collar jobs, and ensure consistency with the green collar jobs strategic initiative, as provided. The bill would also require the CWIB to prepare and annually submit to the Legislature a report containing specified information on the allocation of those grants funds. (27) Existing law creates the Exposition Park Improvement Fund and requires that all revenues received by the California Science Center for the provision of certain services are deposited into that fund. Under existing law, the moneys in the Exposition Park Improvement Fund may only be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for improvements to Exposition Park, as specified. This bill would authorize up to $2,800,000 dollars to be transferred from the Exposition Park Improvement Fund into the General Fund for the 2009–10 fiscal year, as specified. (28) Existing law requires the Department of Finance, the Controller, the Treasurer, and the Department of General Services to collaboratively develop, implement, utilize, maintain, and operate the Financial Information System for California (FISCal) as a single integrated financial management system that encompasses the management of resources and dollars in the areas of budgeting, accounting, procurement, cash management, financial management, financial reporting, cost accounting, asset management, project accounting, grant management, and human resources management. Existing law requires the FISCal Project Office in the Department of Finance to implement these provisions until the Office of the Financial Information System is established. This bill would require the Department of Finance, before executing a contract for the prime vendor to implement these provisions, to submit a written report to the Legislature that includes specified information. The bill would require the report to be submitted to the Legislature for review no less than 30 days before the contract is executed. (29) Existing law, which has been amended by an initiative measure, requires that, prior to release from the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of a person who has been convicted of certain crimes of a sexual nature, the Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation refer that person to the State Department of Mental Health for evaluation if the director determines that person may be a sexually violent predator. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would require the Director of Finance to identify those local costs associated with the implementation of the sexually violent predator law that are necessary to implement or were expressly included in Proposition 83 of the November 7, 2006, General Election, and to propose an amendment to the applicable parameters and guidelines to the Commission on State Mandates. (30) Existing law provides that no dog or cat impounded by a public pound or specified shelter shall be killed before 6 business days, as specified. Formerly, these laws required a waiting period of 72 hours. This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature that the suspension in the Budget Act of 2009 of this requirement does not affect the duties provided in the laws that were impacted by that requirement, and that, therefore, the requirements that dogs and cats be held for a minimum of 72 hours remain in effect. (31) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (32) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, provides a statewide system of coordinated, comprehensive, family-centered, multidisciplinary, and interagency programs that are responsible for providing appropriate early intervention services and support to all eligible infants and toddlers, as defined, and their families. The act requires these services to be provided pursuant to the existing regional center system under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Service Act, and further requires the regional centers to comply with that act and its implementing regulations, as specified. This bill additionally would require a family's private insurance for medical services or a health care service plan identified in the individualized family service plan to be used in compliance with applicable state law and regulation, except for specified purposes. The California Early Intervention Services Act requires an eligible infant or toddler receiving services under the act to have an individualized family service plan (IFSP) . The plan is required to be in writing and to address specified issues, including a statement of the specific early intervention services needed to meet the unique needs of the infant or toddler. This bill would revise the definition of an eligible infant or toddler for purposes of eligibility for services. The bill would also revise the contents of the individualized family service plan, including, retroactive to July 1, 2009, requiring the development, review, or modification of an individualized family service plan to consider certain group training and preschool activities and would make related changes. The bill would prohibit regional centers from purchasing nonrequired services, as defined, except durable medical equipment. This bill would, retroactive to July 1, 2009, require any vendor of applied behavioral analysis services or intensive behavioral intervention services, as defined, under either the California Early Intervention Services Act or the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act to conduct a behavioral assessment of each infant or toddler to whom the vendor provides these services and design an intervention plan for the child. The regional center would be required to purchase these services, subject to prescribed limitations. This bill would also require the State Department of Developmental Services to establish a prevention program for at-risk babies, as defined, under which intake, assessment, case management, and referral to generic agencies, as defined, would be provided. Each regional center would purchase or provide services under the program pursuant to its allocation from the department. Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services is responsible for providing various services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities, and for ensuring the appropriateness and quality of those services and supports. Existing law requires that life quality assessments be conducted with consumers served by private nonprofit regional centers, pursuant to specified criteria. This bill, retroactive to January 1, 2010, would repeal existing quality assurance provisions relating to providing services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities, including the life quality assessment requirements. The bill would, instead, require the State Department of Developmental Services to implement an improved, unified quality assessment system, on or before January 1, 2010. It would require the department to identify a valid and reliable quality assurance instrument that includes assessments of consumer and family satisfaction, provision of services, and personal outcomes. The bill would require the department to contract with an independent agency or organization for this purpose. Implementation of these provisions would be subject to an annual appropriation of funds in the Budget Act. Under existing law, the department contracts with the regional centers to provide services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. These services and supports may include transportation services. This bill, retroactive to July 1, 2009, would impose various requirements relating to the funding of transportation services, at the time of the development, review, or modification of a consumer's IFSP or IPP, as specified. Existing law permits a regional center to purchase, pursuant to vendorization or contract, services and supports for the consumer from any individual or agency that the regional center and the consumer or, where appropriate, his or her parents, legal guardian, conservator, or authorized representative determine will best accomplish all or any part of the consumer's IPP. Under existing law, the regional center and the consumer or, where appropriate, his or her parents, legal guardian, conservator, or authorized representative are required, pursuant to the IPP, to consider specified factors when selecting a provider of services and supports, including the cost of providing services and supports of comparable quality by different providers, if available. This bill would, except as prescribed, require the least costly available provider of comparable services that is able to accomplish all or part of the consumer's IPP, consistent with the particular needs of the consumer and family, as identified in the IPP, to be selected. The bill would also prohibit, retroactive to July 1, 2009, a regional center from purchasing experimental treatments, therapeutic services, or devices that have not been clinically determined or scientifically proven to be effective or safe or for which risks and complications are unknown. It would delay application of this prohibition for persons receiving these services on July 1, 2009, until August 1, 2009. The bill would require a regional center to annually provide to the consumer and his or her parents, legal guardian, conservator, or legal representative a statement of services and supports that the regional center purchased, for the purpose of ensuring that they are delivered. Existing law contains various requirements pertaining to the responsibilities of the department and regional centers concerning the monitoring of consumers in health and residential care facilities. This bill would, retroactive to July 1, 2009, provide that a regional center shall not be required to perform triennial evaluations of specified community care facilities. This bill would, retroactive to July 1, 2009, with specified exceptions, prohibit a regional center from newly vendoring a 24-hour residential care facility licensed by the State Department of Social Services with a licensed capacity of 16 or more beds. Existing law requires a regional center to identify and pursue all possible sources of funding for consumers, including governmental or other entities or programs required to provide or pay the costs of providing services. This bill would require that the department, in consultation with stakeholders, develop an alternative service delivery model that provides an Individual Choice Budget for obtaining quality services and supports that provides choice and flexibility within a finite budget that, in the aggregate, reduces regional center purchase of service expenditures, reduces reliance on the General Fund, and maximizes federal financial participation. The bill would, effective July 1, 2009, prohibit a regional center from purchasing specified services pending implementation of the Individual Choice Budget, except that an exemption from this prohibition may be granted under prescribed circumstances. The bill would also, retroactive to July 1, 2009, impose restrictions on the amount of respite services that may be purchased for a consumer, except that a regional center may grant an exemption from these restrictions under prescribed circumstances. This respite service provision would be repealed upon the occurrence of prescribed conditions relating to the implementation of the Individual Choice Budget. This bill would, retroactive to July 1, 2009, and except as prescribed, provide that a regional center shall not purchase any service that would otherwise be available from prescribed publicly funded program, private insurance, or a health care service plan when the consumer or family meets the criteria of that coverage but chooses not to pursue that coverage. The bill would also, retroactive to July 1, 2009, and except as prescribed, prohibit a regional center from purchasing medical or dental services for a consumer 3 years of age or older from the Medi-Cal program private insurance, or health care service plan unless the regional center is provided documentation of a Medi-Cal, private insurance, or health care service plan denial appeal is being pursued, and the regional center makes a specified determination regarding the appeal. Existing law requires the Director of Developmental Services to establish, annually review, and adjust as needed, a schedule of parental fees for services received through the regional centers. Under existing law, adjustment of the parental fees by the department is subject to the approval of the State Council on Developmental Disabilities. This bill would revise the provisions relating to parental fees, by, among other things, exempting the July 1, 2009, parental fee adjustment from approval by the State Council on Developmental Disabilities and providing for additional factors to be used in determining the fee adjustment. Existing law authorizes an in-home respite worker, as defined, to perform gastrostomy care and feeding of regional center clients, after completing designated training. This bill would expand these provisions to include colostomy, ileostomy, and urinary catheter care, and would refer to these services collectively as incidental medical services. The bill would revise applicable training requirements, and would provide for specified wage increases for in-home respite agencies and staff providing incidental medical services. Existing law requires the department and regional centers to ensure that supported living arrangements for adults with developmental disabilities are made available, as specified. This bill would revise the provisions relating to supported living arrangements by, among other things, setting forth the circumstances under which a regional center would make rent, mortgage, or lease payments or household expenses, as defined, for a consumer. Existing law provides for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes. This bill would prohibit a regional center from purchasing supportive services under the IHSS program for a consumer who meets the criteria for the program, but declines to apply for those services, unless the regional center director waives this provision, as specified, and documents this waiver in an addendum to the consumer's IPP. This bill would require the department and the State Department of Health Care Services, jointly, to seek a Medi-Cal program state plan amendment from the federal government to expand federal financial participation for services to persons with developmental disabilities provided by regional centers. Existing law requires the Director of Developmental Services to establish, maintain, and revise, as necessary, an equitable process for setting rates of state payment for nonresidential services purchased by regional centers, and authorizes the director to promulgate implementing regulations. This bill, retroactive to August 1, 2009, would prohibit regional centers from compensating designated nonresidential service programs for providing any service to a consumer on any of a list of holidays specified in the bill, with the department authorized to adjust these holidays through a program directive. Existing law prohibits the total number of developmental center residents in the secure treatment facility at Porterville Developmental Center from exceeding 297. This bill would include residents receiving services in the center's transition treatment program for purposes of this limit. This bill would require the department to provide information to the Assembly Committee on Budget and Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review during budget hearings for the 2010–11 fiscal year about the effect on the developmental service system of the specific cost containment measures implemented to achieve designated General Fund reductions for the 2009–10 fiscal year pursuant to a specified item of the Budget Act of 2009. The bill also would require the department to continue to convene, as appropriate, a stakeholder review process to obtain information and comments about implementation of these cost containment measures and their effect on the developmental service system. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.