This measure would proclaim, in perpetuity, January 28 as the Stand Against Hate Action Day.
(1) Existing law generally requires a health care professional at whose request a test is performed to provide or arrange for the provision of the results of a clinical laboratory test to the patient who is the subject of the test if so requested by the patient, in oral or written form. Existing law requires those results to be disclosed in plain language and in oral or written form, except the results may be disclosed in electronic form if requested by the patient and if deemed most appropriate by the health care professional who requested the test. Existing law requires a patient's consent to receive their laboratory results by internet posting or other electronic means and requires those results to be disclosed to the patient in a reasonable time period, but only after the results have been reviewed by a health care professional and if access to the results is restricted by use of a secure personal identification number when the results are disclosed to the patient. This bill would define "test" for these purposes to apply to both clinical laboratory tests and imaging scans, such as x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, or other similar technologies and would also make conforming changes. The bill would remove the requirement that a health care professional review the results before the results are disclosed to the patient by internet posting or other electronic means. (2) Existing law establishes procedures for providing access to health care records or summaries of those records by patients and those persons having responsibility for decisions respecting the health care of others. Under existing law, any adult patient of a health care provider, any minor patient authorized by law to consent to medical treatment, and any patient's personal representative is entitled to inspect patient records upon presenting to the health care provider a request for those records and upon payment of reasonable costs, except as specified. A patient who is a minor is entitled to inspect patient records pertaining only to health care of a type for which the minor is lawfully authorized to consent. Existing law also prohibits the representative of a minor from inspecting the minor's patient records under certain circumstances, including with respect to which the minor has a right of inspection. This bill would additionally prohibit the representative of a minor from inspecting the minor's patient records when the records relate to certain services, including medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy, as specified. (3) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing federal regulations require the implementation of specified application programming interfaces (API) for the access to and exchange of health data and plan information. This bill would require, commencing January 1, 2024, health care service plans and health insurers to establish and maintain API, as described by the federal regulations, for the benefit of enrollees, insureds, and contracted providers. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law requires political advertisements to include specified disclosure statements that identify the name of the campaign committee paying for the advertisement and the top contributors, as defined, to that committee. Existing law requires a campaign committee that pays for the circulation of a state or local initiative, referendum, or recall petition to disclose its top contributors, as prescribed. Existing law establishes other requirements regarding the form, content, and presentation of initiative, referendum, and recall petitions. This bill would require an initiative, referendum, or recall petition to instruct voters to sign the petition only after viewing certain disclosures regarding the top contributors to the initiative, referendum, or recall, as specified. This bill would make additional changes to requirements regarding the form, content, and presentation of initiative, referendum, and recall petitions. This bill would make changes to the disclosure requirements for certain political advertisements to identify the top contributors to the campaign committee paying for the advertisement, including changes to the required form, content, and presentation of the disclosures depending on the medium in which the advertisement appears. Because political advertisements are regulated under the Political Reform Act of 1974, and a violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Existing law requires the Public Utilities Commission, in establishing rates for water service, to consider separate charges for costs associated with customer service, facilities, variable operating costs, or other components of the water service provided to water users. Existing law requires the commission to consider, and authorizes the commission to authorize, a water corporation to establish programs, including rate designs, for achieving conservation of water and recovering the cost of these programs through the rates. This bill would, upon application by a water corporation with more than 10,000 service connections, require the commission to consider, and authorize the commission to authorize, the implementation of a mechanism that separates the water corporation's revenues and its water sales, as provided. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above provision would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing this bill's requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA, until January 1, 2030, exempts from its requirements bicycle transportation plans for an urbanized area for restriping of streets and highways, bicycle parking and storage, signal timing to improve street and highway intersection operations, and related signage for bicycles, pedestrians, and vehicles under certain conditions. This bill would delete the requirement that the bicycle transportation plan is for an urbanized area. The bill would extend the exemption to an active transportation plan or pedestrian plan. The bill would define "active transportation plan" and "pedestrian plan." The bill would specify that individual projects that are a part of an active transportation plan or pedestrian plan remain subject to the requirements of CEQA unless those projects are exempt by another provision of law. CEQA exempts from its requirements certain projects that are, among other things, located in an urbanized area, including transit prioritization projects, as defined, and projects for pedestrian and bicycle facilities or for the institution or increase of new bus rapid transit, bus, or light rail services on public or highway rights-of-way. For those exempted projects exceeding $100,000,000 in 2020 United States dollars, CEQA, except as provided, requires the lead agency to, among other things, complete and consider the results of a project business case and a racial equity analysis, as specified, and requires the lead agency, before exempting a project from CEQA, to hold at least 3 noticed public meetings in the project area, as provided. CEQA requires the lead agency, before granting an exemption for projects under the above provisions, to certify that those projects will be carried out by a skilled and trained workforce, except as provided. Existing law repeals the above-described exemption on January 1, 2023. This bill would extend the exemption to January 1, 2030. The bill would revise and recast the exemption to, among other things, repeal the requirement that the exempted projects are located in an urbanized area, extend the exemption by revising the definition of transit prioritization projects, and require projects for the institution or increase of bus rapid transit, bus, or light rail service, as provided, to be located on a site that is wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census Bureau. The bill would revise the requirements for the project business case and racial equity analysis and noticed public meetings to apply to exempted projects exceeding $100,000,000 and would additionally require the lead agency to complete an analysis of residential displacement and suggest antidisplacement strategies, designs, or actions for those projects for which at least 50% of the project or projects' stops and stations are located in an area at risk of residential displacement and will have a maximum of 15-minute peak headways. The bill would require the lead agency to define or identify areas at risk of residential displacement. For projects that provide for the construction or maintenance of certain hydrogen refueling infrastructure or facilities or that exceed $50,000,000, the bill would require the lead agency to hold certain noticed meetings, as provided. The bill would require the lead agency to take an action at a public meeting of its governing board to certify that the project will be completed by a skilled and trained workforce following the granting of the exemption and would provide that the certification requirement is not required under specified circumstances. This bill would specify that the revision made by this bill to the exemption for projects for the institution or increase of bus rapid transit, bus, or light rail service may apply to projects for which a notice of exemption is filed before January 1, 2023. The bill would, for projects exempted by the above-described provisions for which a notice of exemption was filed before January 1, 2023, authorize the lead agency to either certify that the project will be completed by a skilled and trained workforce after the granting of the exemption or exempt those projects from the certification requirement if the lead agency demonstrates compliance with certain conditions.
Existing law authorizes a county to establish a repository and distribution program for the donation of surplus medication and redistribution to persons in need of financial assistance to ensure access to necessary pharmaceutical therapies. This bill would, until January 1, 2030, authorize a regional pilot program in the Counties of Santa Clara and San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of implementing and maintaining a repository and distribution program, as specified. The bill would require participating pharmacies in the regional pilot program to be owned or operated by one of the 3 counties and not on probation with the California State Board of Pharmacy. The bill would exempt the regional pilot program from a specified provision that generally applies to donation of surplus medication redistribution programs. Specifically for the regional pilot program, this bill would authorize donated medication to be transferred more than once, but only within a county, and would allow donated medication from multiple facilities to be commingled by the participating entity. The bill would require participants to maintain a system of recording and logging donated medication to allow the tracking, as specified, and to disclose to the Board of Pharmacy any medication errors, as defined, within 30 days of discovery of the error by the participating entity. This bill would, on January 1, 2028, require the Board of Pharmacy to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the regional pilot program and the pilot program participants' compliance to program requirements. Existing law defines a donor organization to refer to specified health and care facilities that may donate centrally stored, unused medications. This bill would expand the list of entities that may act as a donor organization to include a facility licensed by the State Department of Social Services, the State Department of Public Health, the State Department of Health Care Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice, and other specified licensed facilities. Existing law authorizes a pharmacy, licensed in California and not on probation with the California State Board of Pharmacy, whose primary or sole type of pharmacy practice type is limited to a skilled nursing facility, home health care, board and care, or mail order, to donate unused, unexpired medication, as specified. This bill would authorize any pharmacy, licensed in California and not on probation with the California State Board of Pharmacy, to donate unused, unexpired medication, as specified. This bill would exempt specified persons and entities, including a prescription drug manufacturer, a participating entity, and a pharmacist or physician, from criminal or civil liability for an injury caused when any entity or person donates, accepts, or dispenses prescription drugs in compliance with specified provisions. The bill would also include a surplus medication collection and distribution intermediary in this exemption, as specified. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for these 3 counties.
Existing law requires local educational agencies to identify, locate, and assess individuals with exceptional needs and to provide those individuals with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment, with special education and related services, as reflected in an individualized education program. This bill would require the State Department of Education to, on or before November 30, 2023, publish data related to federal measures of least restrictive environment for pupils with disabilities, as provided. The bill would make findings and declarations relating to pupils with disabilities.
Existing law requires a marketplace, as defined, to ensure that its terms and conditions regarding commercial relationships with marketplace sellers meet certain criteria, including that they are drafted in plain and intelligible language. This bill would, commencing July 1, 2023, require an online marketplace, as defined, to require a high-volume third-party seller on the online marketplace, not later than 10 days after qualifying as a high-volume third-party seller, to provide to the online marketplace specified information, including certain contact information and a bank account number or, if the seller does not have a bank account, the name of the payee for payments issued by the online marketplace to the seller, as prescribed. The bill would require an online marketplace to suspend future sales activity of a high-volume third-party seller that is not in compliance with the provisions described in this paragraph, as specified. This bill would require the online marketplace to verify the information provided by the high-volume third-party seller pursuant to the provisions described above within 10 days and would require the online marketplace to verify within 10 days any changes to the information and to, at least annually, notify each high-volume third-party seller on the online marketplace that the seller must inform the online marketplace of any changes to the information, as provided. This bill would also require an online marketplace to, among other things, require a high-volume third-party seller with at least $20,000 of gross annual revenues from transactions with buyers in California through the online marketplace to provide, subject to certain exceptions, certain information, including the seller's physical address, to the online marketplace and to disclose the information to consumers in a clear and conspicuous manner in the order confirmation message, or other communication made to a consumer after a purchase is finalized, and in the consumer's account transaction history. The bill would require an online marketplace to suspend future sales activity of a high-volume third-party seller under certain circumstances, including that the high-volume third-party seller is not in compliance with the provisions described in this paragraph. This bill would require an online marketplace to comply with specified recordkeeping and security procedures with regard to the information required to comply with these provisions. The bill would subject a person or entity who violates the bill's provisions to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 for each violation, which may be assessed and recovered only in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General.
