Photo of Bob Wieckowski
D California Senate · District 10

Sen. Bob Wieckowski

Compare
Total votes
29,825
all sessions
Attendance
98%
401 missed
Higher than 77% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
988
bills & resolutions
Lower than 88% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
988 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
988
Primary
224
Co-sponsor
764
This page
988
matching current filters
Primary SB 680
Passed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Names.

Existing law, the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, among other things, authorizes a credit card issuer to issue a card to a married woman bearing either her maiden name or her married name as the woman directs and also authorizes a credit card issuer to require a married woman requesting a card bearing her maiden name to open an account in that name. Existing law, the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, among other things, prohibits a consumer credit reporting agency from furnishing a consumer credit report to a retail seller who intends to use the report for specified purposes, unless the consumer credit reporting agency matches at least 3 categories of identifying information within the file maintained by the agency on the consumer with the information provided by the agency to the retail seller. Existing law defines "categories of information" for these purposes to not include a mother's maiden name. Existing law defines the term "personal identifying information" for purposes of provisions relating to civil identity theft actions to include a mother's maiden name. Existing law generally regulates the recovery of unclaimed property by verified petition that must, among other things, state the full name, and the place and date of birth of the decedent whose estate, or any part thereof, is claimed, and the full name of the decedent's father and maiden name of the decedent's mother. Existing law authorizes a county, the district attorney, and the courts, in consultation with a local law enforcement agency, to establish a mutually agreeable procedure to protect confidential personal information regarding any witness or victim contained in a police report, arrest report, or investigative report. Existing law defines "confidential personal information" for these purposes to include a mother's maiden name. Existing law prohibits a ward of the juvenile court or of the Department of Youth Authority from being employed to perform a function that provides access to personal information of private individuals. Existing law defines "personal information" for these purposes to include a mother's maiden name. This bill would modify those provisions to replace the terms "maiden name" with "last name before marriage," "mother's maiden name" with "parent's last name before marriage," "full name of the decedent's father and maiden name of the decedent's mother" with "name of each of the decedent's parents and the last name before first marriage of each of the decedent's parents," and "woman" with "person." The bill would also make nonsubstantive changes.

Passed Aug 22, 2019 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AJR 20
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
State veterans cemeteries: Hmong veterans.

This measure would urge the United States Congress and the President of the United States to permit states to extend burial and memorial benefits to Hmong veterans at state veterans cemeteries.

Passed Aug 21, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1217
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Political Reform Act of 1974: electioneering and issue lobbying communications: disclosures.

The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and activities. Among other things, the act requires specified disclosures in advertisements regarding the source of the advertisement. The act defines "advertisement" for these purposes to mean a general or public communication that is authorized and paid for by a committee for the purpose of supporting or opposing a candidate or candidates for elective office or a ballot measure or ballot measures. The act also requires certain advertisements paid for by certain committees to disclose the names of the top contributors, which is defined for these purposes to mean the persons from whom the committee paying for an advertisement has received its three highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more. This bill would require a person who makes payments of $10,000 dollars or more for "electioneering communications" or "issue lobbying communications" to make specified disclosures in connection with those communications. The bill would define "electioneering communication" to mean any public communication that clearly identifies a candidate for elective state office, but does not expressly advocate for the election or defeat of the candidate, and that is disseminated, broadcast, distributed, or published during a specified period before an election. It would define "issue lobbying communication" to mean any public communication that clearly refers to and reflects a view on the subject matter, description, or name of one or more clearly identified pending state legislative or administrative actions, and that meets other specified criteria. The bill would also require a person who makes payments for electioneering or issue lobbying communications to disclose the names of the persons providing the funding for those payments, as specified, and to maintain records to verify the accuracy of the required disclosures. Because a violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Passed Aug 19, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SJR 3
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Social Security.

This measure would request the Congress of the United States to enact, and the President to sign, legislation that would repeal the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision from the Social Security Act.

Signed into law Aug 19, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 27
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Primary elections: ballot access: tax returns.

Existing law establishes processes for printing on presidential primary ballots the names of candidates for President of the United States who are considered to be generally recognized candidates or who are selected by a sufficient number of registered voters. Existing law, applicable to non-presidential direct primary elections, requires the Secretary of State to transmit to each county elections official a certified list of candidates who are eligible to be voted for in the official's county at a direct primary election. This bill would enact the Presidential Tax Transparency and Accountability Act, which would require a candidate for President, in order to have the candidate's name placed upon a primary election ballot, to file the candidate's income tax returns for the 5 most recent taxable years with the Secretary of State, as specified. The act would require the Secretary of State, within 5 days of receiving the returns, to make redacted versions of the returns available to the public on the Secretary of State's internet website. This bill would impose the same requirements on candidates for Governor. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Jul 30, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SJR 4
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Title X.

This measure would urge the United States Department of Health and Human Services to rescind the new Title X regulations that will impede access to essential, time-sensitive health care for low-income individuals across California and the nation.

Signed into law Jul 15, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 53
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to the 75th anniversary of D-Day, the invasion of Normandy.

This measure would recognize June 6, 2019, as the 75th anniversary of the invasion of Normandy, also known as D-Day. This measure would express the gratitude and appreciation of the Legislature to the members of the United States Armed Forces who participated in D-Day, and would call upon the people of California to observe the anniversary with appropriate reflections and recognition.

Signed into law Jun 28, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 430
Passed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Public employees' retirement benefits: judges.

The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) generally requires a public retirement system, as defined, to modify its pension plan or plans to comply with the act, as specified. Among other things, PEPRA prohibits a public employer offering a defined benefit pension plan from exceeding specified retirement formulas for new members and prohibits an enhancement of a public employee's retirement formula or benefit adopted after January 1, 2013, from applying to service performed prior to the operative date of the enhancement. PEPRA defines terms for those purposes, including defining "new member" to mean, among other things, an individual who becomes a member of any public retirement system for the first time on or after January 1, 2013, and who was not a member of any other public retirement system prior to that date. Existing law creates the Judges' Retirement System II, which is administered by the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, for the provision of retirement and other benefits to specified judges and their beneficiaries. This bill would grant a judge who was elected to office in 2012, but did not take office until on or after January 1, 2013, the option of making a one-time, irrevocable election to have a pre-January 1, 2013, membership status in the Judges' Retirement System II for service accrued after on and after July 1, 2020. The bill would require the election to be made during a 30-day period beginning March 1, 2020. A judge making this election would no longer be a new member under specified provisions of PEPRA. The election would apply prospectively only, and membership rights and obligations that accrued based on service subject to PEPRA prior to July 1, 2020, would remain unchanged. The bill would specify that the Public Employees' Retirement System is not obligated to inform or locate a person who may be eligible to make the election and that its provisions do not affect the Legislature's reserved right to increase contributions or reduce benefits for purposes of the Judges' Retirement System II.

Passed Jun 26, 2019 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 477
Passed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Personal income taxes: credit: deduction: qualified education loan.

The Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law and various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by that law, including a deduction for interest paid on qualified education loans not to exceed $2,500. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2025, would eliminate that deduction for certain taxpayers and allow a credit to those taxpayers against those taxes in an amount equal to the interest paid by the taxpayer during the taxable year on a qualified education loan, as defined, not to exceed $2,000 in the case of spouses filing a joint return or $1,000 for other individuals. The bill would also provide that the credit amount is $0 for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2025, unless otherwise specified in a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Act, in which case the bill would instead allow the deduction. The bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, would make that credit inoperative and would reinstate the eliminated deduction. Existing law requires a bill that would authorize a new credit against the tax imposed by the Personal Income Tax Law or the Corporation Tax Law to contain specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the new credit will achieve, and detailed performance indicators and data collection requirements for determining whether the new credit achieves these goals, purposes, and objectives. This bill would make findings specifying the goals, purposes, and objectives of the above-described tax credits and would require the Franchise Tax Board to provide a report regarding the credit. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Passed Jun 24, 2019 0 co-sponsors
Showing 171 to 180 of 988 bills
Previous 1 … 17 18 19 … 99 Next