This measure would proclaim January 26, 2015, as India Republic Day, and would urge all Californians to join in celebrating India Republic Day.
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires, except as otherwise provided, Medi-Cal provider payments to be reduced by 1% or 5%, and provider payments for specified non-Medi-Cal programs to be reduced by 1%, for dates of service on and after March 1, 2009, and until June 1, 2011. Existing law requires, except as otherwise provided, Medi-Cal provider payments and payments for specified non-Medi-Cal programs to be reduced by 10% for dates of service on and after June 1, 2011. This bill would, instead, prohibit the application of those reductions for payments to providers for dates of service on or after June 1, 2011. The bill would also require payments for managed care health plans for dates of service following the effective date of the bill to be determined without application of some of those reductions. The bill would require the Director of Health Care Services to implement this provision to the maximum extent permitted by federal law and for the maximum time period for which the director obtains federal approval for federal financial participation for those payments. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
The Personal Income Tax Law, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws, allows various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by that law. This bill would allow as a deduction incomputing adjusted gross income for those amounts contributed to a Coverdell education savings account, up to $750 per taxable year, as provided. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Existing law imposes an annual minimum franchise tax, except as provided, on every corporation incorporated in this state, qualified to transact intrastate business in this state, or doing business in this state. Existing law exempts a corporation that incorporates or qualifies to do business in this state from the payment of the minimum franchise tax in its first taxable year. Existing law imposes an annual tax in an amount equal to the minimum franchise tax on every limited partnership, limited liability company and limited liability partnership doing business in this state. In addition, existing law requires every limited partnership that has filed a certificate with the Secretary of State and every foreign limited partnership that has registered with the Secretary of State, every limited liability company if the articles of organization have been accepted by, or a certificate of registration has been issued by, the Secretary of State, and every registered limited liability partnership and every foreign limited liability partnership that has registered with the Secretary of State, to pay an annual tax in an amount equal to the minimum franchise tax. This bill would reduce that minimum franchise or annual tax in the 2nd taxable year, for a new corporation, and the first taxable year for a new limited partnership, new limited liability partnership, and new limited liability company that is a small business, which is defined as a business entity with gross receipts of $5000 or less, as specified. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Existing law, the Hepatitis C Education, Screening, and Treatment Act, requires the Director of Public Health to develop and implement a public education and outreach program to raise awareness of the hepatitis C virus aimed at high-risk groups, physician's offices, health care workers, and health care facilities that, among other things, includes hepatitis C counseling, education, and testing, as appropriate, into local state-funded programs. This bill would require a health care practitioner to offer a qualifying individual, as defined, a hepatitis C screening test or hepatitis C diagnostic test, as defined, unless the health care practitioner reasonably believes, among other things, that the qualifying individual is being treated for a life threatening emergency. If an individual consents to a hepatitis C screening test or diagnostic test and the test is positive or reactive, the health care practitioner would be required to offer followup health care or to refer the individual to a health care practitioner who can provide followup health care. The bill would require that the offering of a hepatitis C screening test or diagnostic test be culturally and linguistically appropriate, and would require the director to issue guidance on the culturally and linguistically appropriate offering of a test by July 1, 2015. These requirements would not apply to an individual receiving health care from a health care practitioner in a hospital or emergency room setting.
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which is permitted to adjudge certain children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, and prescribes various hearings and other procedures for these purposes. Existing law prohibits the court from terminating dependency jurisdiction over a nonminor who has reached 18 years of age until a hearing is conducted and the county welfare department has submitted a report verifying that specified information, documents, and services have been provided to the child. This bill would revise and recast these provisions to, among other things, require the county welfare department to submit reports at the first regularly scheduled hearing after the child has attained 16 years of age and at the hearing immediately prior to the child attaining 18 years of age, verifying that the county has provided certain of the above-described information, documents, and services to the child. By increasing the reporting duties of county welfare departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Existing law, the Professional Fiduciaries Act, establishes the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau within the Department of Consumer Affairs and requires the bureau to license and regulate professional fiduciaries, as specified. The Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act provides for the organization of a corporation under specified provisions of law for the purposes of qualifying as a professional corporation under that act and rendering professional services. The act defines professional services as services that may be lawfully rendered only pursuant to a license, certification, or registration authorized by the Business and Professions Code, the Chiropractic Act, or the Osteopathic Act. This bill would provide for the formation of licensed professional fiduciary corporations pursuant to the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act, as specified, and would make these corporations subject to registration by the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau and payment of a licensure fee, as specified. The bill would provide that it is unprofessional conduct and a violation of the Professional Fiduciaries Act to violate, attempt to violate, directly or indirectly, or assist in or abet the violation of, or conspire to violate these provisions, the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act, or any regulations duly adopted under those laws. The bill would require the name of a licensed professional fiduciary corporation and any name or names under which it may render professional services to contain the words "licensed professional fiduciary" and wording or abbreviations denoting corporate existence. The bill would require each director, shareholder, officer, or employee of a licensed professional fiduciary corporation who renders professional services to be a licensed person with regard to the professional services rendered and to also be a licensed professional fiduciary. The bill would prohibit the income of a licensed professional fiduciary corporation attributable to professional services rendered while a shareholder is a disqualified person, as defined, from accruing, in any manner, to the benefit of the shareholder or his or her shares in the licensed professional fiduciary corporation. The bill would require the bylaws of a licensed professional fiduciary corporation to include a provision that requires the capital stock of the corporation owned by a disqualified person, as defined, or a deceased person, to be sold to the corporation or to the remaining shareholders of the corporation within 60 days. The bill would require a licensed professional fiduciary corporation to maintain insurance coverage of at least $1,000,000 for claims against the corporation, as specified. The bill would require a licensed fiduciary corporation that is appointed as a guardian, conservator, personal representative, or trustee by a court to be liable for any licensed professional fiduciary who violates the powers and duties of those appointments while acting on behalf of the corporation. The bill would impose other various duties upon a licensed professional fiduciary corporation, as specified. The bill would provide authority to the bureau to enforce the provisions of this act, as specified, and in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. Existing law governing the administration of estates and trusts authorizes the appointment of a person as a personal representative of a decedent's estate, a guardian or conservator of a person or an estate, or a trustee. Existing law defines "person" to include a corporation for these purposes. This bill would provide that if a licensed professional fiduciary corporation is appointed as a guardian, conservator, trustee, or personal representative, each shareholder, officer, director, or employee of the corporation who is a licensed professional fiduciary may individually exercise the powers and duties of that appointment, as specified.
(1) Existing law, the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $11,140,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a safe drinking water and water supply reliability program. Existing law provides for the submission of the bond act to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. This bill would repeal these provisions. (2) Under existing law, various measures have been approved by the voters to provide funds for water supply and protection facilities and programs. Existing law, the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, an initiative measure approved by the voters as Proposition 84 at the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $5,388,000,000 for the purposes of financing safe drinking water, water quality and supply, flood control, natural resource protection, and park improvements. Existing law, the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, approved by the voters as Proposition 1E at the November 7, 2006, general statewide election, authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,090,000,000 for the purposes of financing disaster preparedness and flood prevention projects. Existing law, the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002, an initiative measure approved by the voters as Proposition 50 at the November 5, 2002, statewide general election, authorizes, for the purposes of financing a safe drinking water, water quality, and water reliability program, the issuance of bonds in the amount of $3,440,000,000. Existing law, the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000, approved by the voters as Proposition 13 at the March 7, 2000, statewide primary election, authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $1,970,000,000 for the purposes of financing a safe drinking water, clean water, watershed protection, and flood protection program. Existing law, the Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Supply Act, approved by the voters as Proposition 204 at the November 5, 1996, statewide general election, authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $995,000,000 for the purposes of financing a safe, clean, reliable water supply program. Existing law, the Water Conservation and Water Quality Bond Law of 1986, approved by the voters as Proposition 44 at the June 3, 1986, statewide primary election, authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $150,000,000 for the purposes of financing a water conservation and water quality program. This bill would enact the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $7,120,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a water quality, supply, and infrastructure improvement program. This bill, upon voter approval, would reallocate $425,000,000 of the unissued bonds authorized for the purposes of Propositions 1E, 13, 44, 50, 84, and 204 to finance the purposes of a water quality, supply, and infrastructure improvement program. This bill would provide for the submission of these provisions to the voters at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law establishes various public social services programs to provide protection, care, and assistance to the people of the state in need of those services, by providing appropriate aid and services to the needy and distressed. Existing law establishes homeless youth emergency service pilot projects in the Counties of Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Clara, and San Francisco. This bill would create the Homeless Youth Basic Material Needs Assistance Program. This bill would require that moneys appropriated by the Legislature for the purposes of the program be allocated proportionally by the State Department of Social Services to each county that elects to establish a program based on the number of homeless youth in the county, which is to be used to establish and operate the program in the county. The bill would authorize a county to join with one or more other counties for the purpose of pooling their respective allocations and establishing a program for those counties. The bill would require each program to solicit proposals from and contract with nonprofit organizations for the purpose of providing basic material needs assistance to homeless youth in the county or counties as directed by the entity administering the program and would require contracted nonprofit organizations to consult with the children and family commission of the county or counties, as specified, if the entity administering the program elects to include homeless youth from birth to 5 years of age, inclusive, in its program. The bill would enact other related provisions.
This measure would declare that the Legislature joins the County of Riverside in opposing base realignment and closure affecting the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Corona Division, and March Air Reserve Base.
