BM
D California Assembly · District 76 · Former member

Asm. Brian Maienschein

Contact Email
Compare
Total votes
28,994
all sessions
Attendance
96%
863 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
91%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
4%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
2,186
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
2,186 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,186
Primary
266
Co-sponsor
1,920
This page
2,186
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 147
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Agriculture Day.

This measure would recognize and honor the men and women of California agriculture for their dedication and productivity by observing March 15, 2016, as National Agriculture Day, and designating March 16, 2016, as California Agriculture Day.

Signed into law Apr 29, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 333
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Controlled substances.

(1) Existing law generally provides that the possession of Ketamine, gamma hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) , and flunitrazepam is a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year. This bill would make it a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years, to possess Ketamine, flunitrazepam, or GHB, with the intent to commit sexual assault, as defined for these purposes to include, among other acts, rape, sodomy, and oral copulation. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vetoed Apr 25, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 133
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Women and Girls in STEM Week.

This measure would designate April 3, 2016, to April 9, 2016, inclusive, as Women and Girls in STEM Week and would encourage all citizens and community organizations to support the observance of California Women and Girls in STEM Week by encouraging and celebrating women in the STEM fields.

Signed into law Apr 19, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 110
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Threats: schools.

Existing law makes it a crime to willfully threaten to commit a crime that will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement is to be taken as a threat and which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety. Under existing law, this crime is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for no more than one year for a misdemeanor, or by imprisonment in state prison for a felony. This bill would make a person who, by any means, including, but not limited to, by means of an electronic act, willfully threatens unlawful violence to another person to occur upon the grounds of a school, as defined, with specific intent and under certain circumstances, and that threat creates a disruption at the school, guilty of a misdemeanor or felony punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for a specified term. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vetoed Apr 19, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2658
In committee · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
California Coastal Commission: ex parte communications.

The California Coastal Act of 1976, for purposes of the act, defines an "ex parte communication" as any oral or written communication between a member of the California Coastal Commission and an interested person about a matter within the commission's jurisdiction, which does not occur in a public hearing, workshop, or other official proceeding, or on the official record of the proceeding on the matter, but excludes from that definition any communication between a staff member acting in his or her official capacity and any commission member or interested person. The act prohibits a member of the commission and an interested person from conducting an ex parte communication, unless the member fully discloses and makes public the ex parte communication, as specified. This bill would require commission staff members to maintain records and disclose any communication with an interested person pertaining to a matter before the commission by including specified information about the communication in staff reports provided to commission members. Existing law authorizes any person to testify at a hearing or other official proceeding of the commission and to submit written comments for the record on a matter before the commission. This bill would require video or audio recordings of those proceedings to be posted on the commission's Internet Web site within 72 hours after the proceeding and would require written and electronic communications submitted to the commission as part of those proceedings to be posted on the commission's Internet Web site within 7 days of receipt.

In committee Apr 18, 2016 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1,681 to 1,690 of 2,186 bills