Photo of William P. Brough
R California Assembly · District 73

Asm. William P. Brough

Compare
Total votes
14,942
all sessions
Attendance
91%
953 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
96%
of cast votes
Lower than 82% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 86% of chamber peers
Sponsored
770
bills & resolutions
Lower than 87% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
770 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
770
Primary
93
Co-sponsor
677
This page
770
matching current filters
Primary AB 3126
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Contractors' State License Law: cash deposit in lieu of a bond.

Existing law, the Contractors' State License Law, provides for licensing and regulation of contractors by the Contractors' State License Board, which is within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires an applicant for licensure or a licensee to file or have on file certain bonds, including a contractor's bond in the sum of $15,000. Existing law authorizes an applicant or licensee to instead post a cash deposit in lieu of a required bond. This bill would revise the authorization to post a cash deposit in lieu of a bond to prohibit, among other things, certificates of deposit, and instead would require the contractor to deposit the appropriate amount of lawful money or a cashier's check with the registrar pursuant to specified statutes on and after January 1, 2019, and would require each person licensed under that law and subject to any bond requirement to maintain the required bond as executed by an admitted surety insurer or the money deposited with the registrar in the appropriate amount, except as specified. The bill would require all existing alternatives in lieu of a bond or the specified deposit with the registrar, currently filed with the board, to be replaced for a surety bond or the specified deposit with the registrar by January 1, 2020. The bill would provide that the information required from the contractor to obtain the surety requirements be consistent with the information required to obtain a contractor's license. The bill would require that any deposits of money or cashier's checks to the registrar under these provisions be deposited in an interest-bearing or share account, as specified. The bill would also require a contractor who deposits money or a cashier's check with the registrar to submit a $100 fee to the registrar to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be used to cover the expenses incurred in processing the deposits and paying claims made against the deposits. The bill would create the Contractors' Deposit Fund in the State Treasury for these purposes.

Signed into law Sep 29, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 1017
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Commercial fishing: drift gill net shark and swordfish fishery: permit transition program.

(1) Existing law prohibits a person from using or operating, or assisting in using or operating, a boat, aircraft, net, trap, line, or other appliance to take fish for commercial purposes unless the person holds a commercial fishing license issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Existing law prohibits the taking of shark and swordfish for commercial purposes with drift gill nets except under a valid drift gill net shark and swordfish permit (DGN permit) issued to that person that has not been suspended or revoked and is issued to at least one person aboard the boat, except as provided. Existing law authorizes the Director of Fish and Wildlife to close the drift gill net shark and swordfish fishery if, after a public hearing, the director determines the action is necessary to protect the swordfish or thresher shark and mako shark resources and requires the director to reopen the fishery if he or she determines that the conditions that necessitated the closure no longer exist. Existing law authorizes a DGN permit to be transferred to another person under certain circumstances. Under existing law, a violation of these provisions is a crime. The California Ocean Protection Act creates the California Ocean Protection Trust Fund in the State Treasury and authorizes moneys deposited in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be expended by the Ocean Protection Council for, among other things, grants or loans to public agencies, nonprofit corporations, or private entities for, or direct expenditures on, projects or activities that protect, conserve, and restore coastal waters and ocean ecosystems including through the acquisition from willing sellers of vessels, equipment, licenses, harvest rights, permits, and other rights and property, to reduce threats to ocean ecosystems and resources. This bill would require the department by March 31, 2020, to establish a voluntary permit transition program that includes specified conditions, including a condition that a permittee who voluntarily surrenders his or her DGN permit and shark or swordfish gill net or nets receive, to the extent that funds for the transition program are available, a specified payment, as prescribed. The bill would require the department to enter into an agreement with a fiscal agent, as defined, for the fiscal agent to receive state and nonstate funds for purposes of the transition program and, upon receipt of adequate funds, to make the payment to a participating permittee. If the department enters into an agreement with a fiscal agent that is a state entity, the bill would continuously appropriate any funds received from nonstate sources to that state entity for purposes of the transition program. The bill would require the Ocean Protection Council to use $1 million of an appropriation made to it in the Budget Act of 2018 for whale and sea turtle entanglement to fund the transition program. The bill would require the department to notify the Legislature within 10 days of the date that the fiscal agent receives $1 million from nonstate sources and secures $1 million through an agreement with the Ocean Protection Council. The bill would require a DGN permit issued pursuant to these provisions to be surrendered or revoked as of January 31 of the 4th year following the department's notification to the Legislature. Because a violation of this provision would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would, beginning March 31, 2019, prohibit the transfer of a DGN permit. The bill would provide that the provisions dealing with the drift gill net shark and swordfish fishery do not create or recognize a property right in fish expected to be caught using a DGN permit. (2) Existing law establishes a swordfish permit that authorizes a person holding that permit to take, possess aboard a boat, and land swordfish for commercial purposes using specified methods but not including use of a drift gill net. Existing law establishes a fee of $330 for a swordfish permit, as adjusted pursuant to the above-described index, but exempts the holder of a DGN permit from payment of that fee. This bill would also exempt any person who participates in the permit transition program established by the department from payment of the fee for a swordfish permit. (3) Existing law makes it unlawful to use fishing lines, including, but not limited to, troll lines and handlines more than 900 feet in length unless they are used as set lines, as specified. This bill would also exempt from this prohibition fishing lines more than 900 feet in length if they are used as part of deep-set buoy gear authorized under federal law. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Sep 27, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1007
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Sales and use taxes: exemption: military and veteran medical facilities.

Existing state sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. The Sales and Use Tax Law provides various exemptions from those taxes, including an exemption for the sale of, or the storage, use, or other consumption of, meals and food products that are furnished or served by any nonprofit veteran's organization for purposes of fundraising, as specified. This bill, on and after January 1, 2019, and before January 1, 2025, would exempt from these taxes the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, building materials and supplies purchased by a qualified person for use by that qualified person in the construction of specified military and veteran medical facilities. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes cities and counties to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse cities and counties for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding these provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse cities and counties for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Signed into law Sep 26, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1109
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Controlled substances: Schedule II drugs: opioids.

(1) The Medical Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California. Under that act, the board is required to adopt and administer standards for the continuing education of physicians and surgeons. Existing law requires a physician and surgeon to complete a mandatory continuing education course in the subjects of pain management and the treatment of terminally ill and dying patients. That act requires the board to give its highest priority to considering a course in pain management among its continuing education requirements for licensees, and requires the board to periodically develop and disseminate information and educational material on pain management techniques and procedures to licensees and general acute care hospitals. This bill would require, for physicians and surgeons licensed on or after January 1, 2019, the mandatory continuing education course to also include the subject of the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs. The bill would require the board to give its highest priority to considering a course in the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs among its continuing education requirements for physicians and surgeons and would require the board to periodically develop and disseminate information and educational material on the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs to physicians and surgeons and general acute care hospitals. (2) The Nursing Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of nursing by the Board of Registered Nursing and makes a violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law authorizes a certified nurse-midwife to furnish or order drugs or devices under specified circumstances, including board certification that the certified nurse-midwife has completed a course in pharmacology, as specified. This bill would require the pharmacology course to include the risks of addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome associated with the use of opioids. Existing law also authorizes a nurse practitioner to furnish or order drugs or devices under specified circumstances, including board certification that the nurse practitioner has completed a course in pharmacology, as specified. Existing law requires nurse practitioners who are authorized to furnish Schedule II controlled substances to complete a mandatory continuing education course in Schedule II controlled substances. This bill would require the mandatory continuing education course to include the risks of addiction associated with their use. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Nursing Practice Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The Physician Assistant Practice Act provides for licensure and regulation of physician assistants by the Physician Assistant Board and authorizes a physician assistant to perform medical services as set forth by regulations when those services are rendered under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon, as specified. The act prohibits a physician assistant from administering, providing, or issuing a drug order to a patient for Schedule II through Schedule V controlled substances without advance approval by a supervising physician and surgeon for that particular patient unless the physician assistant has completed an education course that meets specific standards. This bill would require that course to include the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II controlled substances. (4) The Pharmacy Law provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and pharmacies by the California State Board of Pharmacy. Existing law requires the board to promulgate regulations that require a standardized, patient-centered, prescription drug label on all prescription medicine dispensed to patients in California. The act makes a violation of its provisions a crime. This bill would require a pharmacy or practitioner dispensing an opioid to a patient for outpatient use to prominently display on the label or container a notice that warns of the risk of overdose and addiction, as specified. Because a violation of that requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The Dental Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of persons engaged in the practice of dentistry by the Dental Board of California, which is within the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act authorizes the board, as a condition of license renewal, to require licentiates to successfully complete a portion of required continuing education hours in specific areas, including patient care, health and safety, and law and ethics. This bill would include the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs in those specific areas of continuing education. (6) Existing law, the Osteopathic Act, establishes the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, which issues certificates to, and regulates, osteopathic physicians and surgeons. Existing law requires the board to require each licensed osteopathic physician and surgeon to complete a minimum of 100 hours of American Osteopathic Association continuing education hours during each 2-year cycle, of which 40 hours must be completed in American Osteopathic Association Category 1 continuing education hours as a condition for renewal of an active license. This bill would additionally require licensed osteopathic physician and surgeons to complete a course on the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs. (7) The Optometry Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of optometry by the State Board of Optometry. The act requires an optometrist certified to use therapeutic pharmaceutical agents to complete a total of 50 hours of continuing education every 2 years in order to renew his or her certificate. Existing law requires 35 of the 50 hours of continuing education to be on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of ocular disease in any combination of specified areas, including pain medication. This bill would expand the areas of continuing education to include risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs. (8) The California Uniform Controlled Substances Act classifies opioids as Schedule II controlled substances and places restrictions on the prescription of those drugs, including prohibiting refills and specifying the requirements of a prescription for these drugs. The act makes a violation of its provisions a crime. This bill would require a prescriber to discuss specified information with the minor, the minor's parent or guardian, or other adult authorized to consent to the minor's medical treatment before directly dispensing or issuing for a minor the first prescription in a single course of treatment for a controlled substance containing an opioid. This bill would provide that a violation of these requirements is not a criminal offense. (9) Existing law requires a school district, charter school, or private school that elects to offer an athletic program to take specified actions if an athlete is suspected to have sustained a concussion and to obtain a signed concussion and head injury information sheet from the athlete and athlete's parent or guardian before the athlete initiates practice or competition. This bill would require a youth sports organization, as defined, that elects to offer an athletic program to annually give a specified Opioid Factsheet for Patients to each athlete, and would require each athlete and his or her parent to sign a document acknowledging receipt of that factsheet, as specified. (10) Existing law requires a youth sports organization, as defined, that elects to offer an athletic program to, among other things, annually give a concussion and head injury information sheet to each athlete and requires that the sheet be signed, as specified. This bill would also require a youth sports organization that elects to offer an athletic program to annually give a specified Opioid Factsheet for Patients to each athlete, and would require each athlete and his or her parent to sign a document verifying receipt of that factsheet, as specified. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1645 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 1491 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1491 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Sep 22, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1873
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Driver's licenses: veteran designation.

Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license to an applicant when the department determines that the applicant is lawfully entitled to a license. Existing law allows an in-person applicant for a driver's license or identification card to request the word "VETERAN" be printed on the face of the driver's license or identification card, subject to certain requirements, including, among others, verification of veteran status, as specified, and payment of a $5 fee, which the department is authorized to increase by regulation, in an amount not to exceed $15, as specified. Commencing July 1, 2019, existing law prohibits a fee from being charged for that request if made by (1) a person who has been determined to have a current income level that meets the eligibility requirements for specified assistance programs, or (2) a person who can verify his or her status as a homeless person, in accordance with specified provisions. This bill would make those fee provisions inoperative on July 1, 2019, and repeal them on January 1, 2020, as specified, thereby authorizing an applicant whose veteran status has been verified, as prescribed, to make a veteran designation request, and requiring the department to make that designation on the applicant's driver's license or identification card, without additional charge. The bill also would make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 12811 of the Vehicle Code proposed by SB 987 to be operative only if this bill and SB 987 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Vetoed Sep 21, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1900
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Capital investment incentive programs: repeal date.

Existing law, until January 1, 2019, authorizes a county, city and county, or city to establish a capital investment incentive program, pursuant to which the county, city and county, or city is authorized to pay, upon request, a capital investment incentive amount that does not exceed the amount of property tax derived from that portion of the assessed value of a qualified manufacturing facility, as defined, that exceeds $150,000,000 to a proponent of a qualified manufacturing facility for up to 15 years. This bill would extend the authorization for capital investment incentive programs, as described above, until January 1, 2024.

Signed into law Sep 14, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SCR 159
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Long Beach Fire Captain David Rosa Memorial Highway.

This measure would designate the portion of Interstate 5 between Camino Las Ramblas and the Ortega Highway in the County of Orange as the Long Beach Fire Captain David Rosa Memorial Highway. The measure would also request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.

Signed into law Sep 11, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 2151
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Hunting: reduced-price antelope, elk, bear, and bighorn sheep tags: resident junior hunters.

Under existing law, a hunting license grants the privilege to take birds and mammals. Existing law provides for the issuance by the Department of Fish and Wildlife of tags that are required in addition to a hunting license to take specified animals, including antelope, elk, bears, and bighorn rams. Existing law sets the fee for tags for those animals for a resident of the state as follows: $55 for an antelope tag, $165 for an elk tag, $15 for a bear tag, and $400 for a bighorn sheep tag. Existing law requires those fees to be adjusted annually pursuant to a specified index. This bill would, beginning July 1, 2019, and until July 1, 2025, reduce the fee required to obtain an antelope, elk, bear, or bighorn sheep tag to $20, as adjusted pursuant to the specified index, for a person who is a resident of the state and who possesses a junior hunting license. The bill would require the department to prepare a report to the Legislature no later than July 1, 2024, on the effect of these reduced-price tags on rates of participation by junior hunters, the Big Game Management Account, and the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. The bill would make other related and conforming changes.

Signed into law Sep 7, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 277
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Epilepsy Awareness Month.

This measure would proclaim November 2018 as Epilepsy Awareness Month and call for a recommitment to increasing awareness and understanding of those living with epilepsy.

Signed into law Sep 7, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Showing 201 to 210 of 770 bills
Previous 1 … 20 21 22 … 77 Next