JS
D California Assembly · District 69

Asm. Jose Solorio

Compare
Total votes
19,805
all sessions
Attendance
98%
261 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
696
bills & resolutions
Higher than 94% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
696 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
696
Primary
138
Co-sponsor
558
This page
696
matching current filters
Primary AB 2140
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Crime prevention: criminal gangs.

Existing law creates several crime suppression programs. This bill would make legislative findings relating to gang violence. This bill would establish in the Emergency Management Agency a program designated the High Intensity Interstate Gang Activity Areas Task Force, as specified. This bill would provide that the purpose of the task force is to formulate a comprehensive strategy for addressing high intensity gang activity throughout the state and to advise the Emergency Management Agency on the appropriate disbursements of funds to regional high activity gang areas. This bill would specify task force members and other specified information relating to the operation of the task force.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1603
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Workers' compensation: temporary partial disability.

Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, that generally requires employers to secure the payment of workers' compensation, including medical treatment, for injuries incurred by their employees that arise out of, and in the course of, employment. Existing law provides certain methods for determining workers' compensation benefits payable to a worker or his or her dependents for purposes of temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, permanent total disability, permanent partial disability, and in case of death. Existing case law provides that temporary disability payments cease when: (1) the employee returns to work, (2) the employee is deemed medically able to return to work, or (3) the employee's medical condition becomes permanent and stationary. This bill would require that an employee be deemed to be temporarily partially disabled during the period when the employee's disability is permanent and stationary, no more than 60 days have elapsed after the date the employee was informed that his or her disability is permanent and stationary, the employer has not offered the employee regular, modified, or alternative work, and the employer has not informed the employee that it will not offer the employee regular, modified, or alternative work.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 2779
died · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Workers' compensation: compounded drugs.

Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. This bill would provide that under workers' compensation law, a compounded drug, as defined, dispensed on or after November 1, 2010, shall be reimbursable only if certain conditions, including the condition that all active ingredients in the compounded drug are ingredients in drug products that have been approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration and all other ingredients are listed by the United States Pharmacopeia, are satisfied. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

died Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SCA 6
died · California Senate · Co-sponsor
A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 4 of, and by adding Section 4.5 to, Article XIIIA thereof, by amending Section 2 of Article XIIIC thereof, and by amending Section 3 of Article XIIID thereof, relating to taxation.

The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, and prohibits these entities from imposing an ad valorem tax on real property or a transactions or sales tax on the sale of real property. This measure would alternatively condition the imposition, extension, or increase of a parcel tax, as defined, by a school district, community college district, or county office of education upon the approval of 55% of its voters voting on the proposition, if the proposition meets specified requirements. This measure would also make conforming changes to related provisions.

died Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 118
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Spay Day USA 2010.

This measure would declare February 23, 2010, to be Spay Day USA 2010 in California, and would request that Californians observe that day by having their dogs and cats spayed or neutered and by providing voluntary services or other support to organizations that provide spay and neuter services.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 24
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to marine air pollution.

This resolution would respectfully request that the International Maritime Organization, a specialized agency of the United Nations, adopt the North American Emission Control Area, as proposed by the United States, Canada, and France at the 60th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee, scheduled for March 2010.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 113
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Arizona law.

This measure would urge various state and private entities to withhold financial support of Arizona businesses in response to recent Arizona state laws relating to illegal immigration.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 663
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Legal aid: court interpreters: appearances by telephone.

(1) Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation. Existing law provides that it is the duty of an attorney to, among other things, never reject, for any consideration personal to himself or herself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed. Existing law provides that a lawyer may fulfill his or her ethical commitment to provide pro bono services, in part, by providing financial support to organizations providing free legal services to persons of limited means. This bill would prohibit a person or organization that is not a specified type of legal aid organization, as defined, from using the term "legal aid," or any confusingly similar name in any firm name, trade name, fictitious business name, or other designation, or on any advertisement, letterhead, business card, or sign. The bill would subject a person or organization that violates this prohibition to specified civil liability. (2) Existing law provides that, in all general civil cases, as defined, a party who has provided notice may appear by telephone at certain conferences, hearings, and proceedings, except as specified. This bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before July 1, 2010, and periodically as appropriate, to enter into one or more master agreements with a vendor or vendors to provide for telephone appearances in civil cases under the provisions described above, or as otherwise permitted by law. The bill would impose requirements regarding those master agreements, including that the vendor charge a party for an appearance by telephone in an amount set by the Judicial Council, and that the vendor pay to the state $15 for each appearance by telephone and a proportionate share of an amount equal to the total revenue received from vendors by all courts for providing telephone appearances for the 2008–09 fiscal year. The bill would require those funds to be deposited in the Trial Court Trust Fund and used for specified purposes. (3) Existing law requires that, when a witness is incapable of understanding the English language or is incapable of expressing himself or herself in the English language so as to be understood directly by counsel, court, and jury, an interpreter be sworn to interpret for him or her. This bill would require the Judicial Council, by September 1, 2010, to establish a working group to review, identify, and develop best practices to provide interpreters in civil actions and proceedings, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to select up to 5 courts to participate in a pilot project, to commence on July 1, 2011, to provide interpreters in civil proceedings. The bill would provide that the initial pilot courts shall participate until June 30, 2014, and would require the Judicial Council to consider whether a pilot court shall continue participating in the project and whether to select another court or additional courts. The pilot project would be funded from the revenue derived from the telephonic appearance fee described above. (4) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to conduct a study of language and interpreter use and need in court proceedings, with commentary, and to report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and to the Legislature every 5 years. Existing law requires that this study serve as the basis for determining the need to establish interpreter programs and certification and establishing these programs and examinations through the normal budgetary process. This bill would require, in addition, as of January 1, 2011, that the study described above serve as the basis of determining the need for and use of interpreters in civil and criminal court proceedings. The bill would require trial courts to collect and report the use of interpreters in all criminal and civil proceedings in the manner specified by the Judicial Council.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1565
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Research and development tax credit areas.

Existing law establishes the Department of Housing and Community Development with duties that include overseeing various programs to promote economic and community development throughout the state. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2016, the department to designate, based on specific factors, a Research and Development Tax Credit Area located within an Innovation Hub or a city, as respectively defined. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, by reference to a specified federal statute, allow a credit against taxes imposed by those laws for increasing research activities. The amount of the credit under both laws is equal to 15% of the excess of the qualified research expenses, as defined, for the taxable year over the base amount, as defined, and, in addition, under the Corporation Tax Law, 24% of the basic research payments, as defined. This bill would, under both laws, in lieu of that credit, for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2011, and before January 1, 2016, provide to a qualified taxpayer, as defined, a tax credit for research and development, as defined, for expenses equal to 20% of the research and development expenses relating to the development of alternative energy sources and advanced transportation technologies, as those terms are defined, conducted in California in a research and development tax area, as described. The bill would further require the Legislative Analyst's Office to report to the Legislature on the effectiveness of the tax credit program established by this act. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Showing 281 to 290 of 696 bills
Previous 1 … 28 29 30 … 70 Next