JS
R California Assembly · District 67

Asm. Jim Silva

Compare
Total votes
13,434
all sessions
Attendance
93%
857 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
98%
of cast votes
Higher than 80% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 83% of chamber peers
Sponsored
589
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
589 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
589
Primary
81
Co-sponsor
508
This page
589
matching current filters
Primary AB 32
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
School employees: layoff notices.

(1) Existing law requires that, when a reduction in the number of certificated employees employed by a school district is authorized for specified reasons, the notice of the termination of the services of an employee in the subsequent school year be given, in a prescribed manner, before May 15. This bill would express findings and declarations of the Legislature relating to the effect of the outcome of the May 19, 2009, special election on school district budgets. The bill would require that, in 2009 only, the deadline for the notice of termination of services be changed to June 15. (2) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Oct 26, 2009 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 81
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Land use: City of Industry: stadium complex.

(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect, unless the project is exempt from the act. CEQA provides for various exemptions from its requirements. Existing law requires cities and counties to prepare, adopt, and amend general plans containing specified elements. This bill would exempt from CEQA any activity or approval, necessary or incidental to, the development, planning, design, site acquisition, subdivision, financing, leasing, construction, operation, or maintenance of a stadium complex and associated development included in the same project or approval together with any accessory roadway, utility, or other infrastructure improvement to that stadium complex and associated development, for which an application for the project or approval was submitted on or before January 31, 2009, to the City of Industry, if specified requirements are met. The bill would require the city to require the stadium complex and associated development to comply with those mitigation measures that are contained in a mitigation monitoring and reporting program that is adopted by the City of Industry in connection with the stadium complex and associated development. Because a lead agency would be required to determine the applicability of the exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would exempt from any legal requirement concerning the content of a general plan or consistency with a general plan, and prohibit those requirements from resulting in the invalidation of, the city's approval of, and decisions regarding, specified actions taken with respect to the stadium complex and associated development included in the same project or approval and any accessory improvements to that stadium complex and associated development. The bill additionally would provide that a consistency determination is not required by the city for any decision with respect to those actions. (2) The bill would have retroactive application. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Signed into law Oct 22, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 548
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program.

Under existing law, the Department of General Services, except in the case of contracts for professional bond services, is the administering agency of the California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program, which requires state agencies and all other state entities contracting for materials, supplies, equipment, alteration, repair, or improvement to have at least 3% participation goals for disabled veteran business enterprises. Existing law specifies the duties of the Department of General Services and the Department of Veterans Affairs in meeting that requirement, and sets standards for meeting the program's participation goals, as provided. This bill would require an awarding department, upon completion of an awarded contract for which a commitment to achieve a disabled veteran business enterprise goal was made, to require the prime contractor that entered into a subcontract with a disabled veteran business enterprise to certify to the awarding department certain information pertaining to the contract, and that all payments under the contract have been made to the disabled veteran business enterprise. This bill would also require an awarding department to keep that certification on file. This bill would specify that a person or entity that knowingly provides false information is subject to a civil penalty, as specified, and that an action for a civil penalty may be brought by any public prosecutor in the name of the people of the State of California. The bill would authorize a prime contractor, subject to the approval of the Department of General Services, to replace a disabled veteran business enterprise identified by the prime contractor in its bid or offer, as provided, with another disabled veteran business enterprise.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1059
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Bankruptcy.

Existing law contains various provisions related to the filing of bankruptcy by an individual or corporation under federal bankruptcy law. This bill would make technical changes and changes to conform with federal bankruptcy law to correct obsolete references. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Sections 6610, 8610, 9680, and 12630 of the Corporations Code made by this bill and A.B. 1233 to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 215
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Skilled nursing facilities: ratings.

Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation by the State Department of Public Health of long-term health care facilities, including skilled nursing facilities. Existing law creates the State Health Facilities Citation Penalties Account in the Special Deposit Fund, with the moneys in this account to be used, upon appropriation, for prescribed purposes. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, require skilled nursing facilities to post, in accordance with prescribed requirements, the overall facility rating information determined by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and to inform consumers regarding information available at the department's Internet Web site. A violation of these provisions would be a class B violation, as defined, with the proceeds from fines collected to be deposited into the State Health Facilities Citation Penalties Account.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1233
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Nonprofit and consumer cooperative corporations: nonprofit medical associations.

(1) Existing law, the Nonprofit Corporation Law, regulates the organization and operation of nonprofit public benefit corporations, nonprofit mutual benefit corporations, and nonprofit religious corporations. Existing law, the Consumer Cooperative Corporation Law, regulates the organization and operation of consumer cooperatives. Under those laws, the term "director" is defined as a natural person, designated in the articles or bylaws or elected by the incorporators, as well as natural persons designated, elected or appointed by any other name or title to act as members of the governing body of the corporation. This bill would specify that a person who does not have authority to act as a member of that governing body is not a director, but if the articles or bylaws provide that a natural person is a director or a member of the governing body because he or she occupies a certain position, then that person is a director for all purposes. Existing law authorizes the articles of incorporation and bylaws of nonprofit corporations and consumer cooperatives to contain certain provisions, including, but not limited to, a provision requiring that an amendment or repeal of those articles or bylaws be approved in writing by a specified person or persons other than the board. Existing law also authorizes the articles or bylaws to provide for the designation or selection of directors by a specified person or persons rather than by election by a member or members and similarly to authorize a specified person or persons to remove a designated or selected director. This bill would specify that these approval requirements and designation and selection and removal entitlements are inapplicable or cease in those circumstances when the specified designator has died or ceased to exist, the office or status that created the right or entitlement has ceased to exist, or in certain cases, when the corporation has attempted and failed to obtain approval from the specified person or persons. Under existing law, a majority of the number of directors, authorized in the articles or bylaws, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business of a nonprofit corporation or a consumer cooperative. This bill would, subject to certain limitations, authorize the articles or bylaws to require the presence of one or more specified directors in order to constitute a quorum of the board to transact business. Existing law authorizes a board of a nonprofit corporation or a consumer cooperative to form one or more committees consisting of 2 or more directors to serve at the pleasure of the board and provides that these committees have the authority of the board. This bill would prohibit a committee exercising the authority of the board from including, as members, persons who are not directors; however, the bill would authorize the board to create other committees with nondirectors that do not exercise the authority of the board. Existing law requires a nonprofit corporation or consumer cooperative to have a chairman or a president or both, a secretary, a chief financial officer, and other officers as provided in the bylaws or determined by the board. This bill would require such a corporation to have a chair, as defined, or a president or both, a secretary, a treasurer or a chief financial officer or both, and other officers as provided in the bylaws or determined by the board. The bill would also specify that if there is no chief financial officer, the treasurer is the chief financial officer. Existing law authorizes a nonprofit corporation or consumer cooperative to elect to voluntarily wind up and dissolve by approval of a majority of the members, as defined, or by approval of the board and approval of the members, as defined. This bill would authorize such a corporation meeting certain requirements, including the lack of a quorum, to elect to voluntarily wind up and dissolve, as specified. The bill would also make technical changes to those provisions to conform to federal bankruptcy law. Under existing law, certain public benefit corporations deemed to be private foundations, as defined, are subject to federal Internal Revenue Code requirements. This bill would make those requirements applicable to nonprofit religious corporations deemed to be a private foundation. (2) Existing law prohibits a cause of action for monetary damages from arising against any director or officer of a nonprofit corporation or a nonprofit medical association, who serves without compensation, on account of any specified negligent act or omission if the nonprofit corporation or nonprofit medical association has a general liability insurance policy in a specified amount that is in force both at the time of the injury and at the time the claim is made. This bill would instead prohibit those causes of action if these corporations or associations maintain a liability insurance policy that is applicable to the claim. (3) Existing law regulates unincorporated associations. Existing law authorizes an unincorporated association to merge into a specified corporation, limited partnership, general partnership, or limited liability company. This bill would authorize an unincorporated association to merge with one of these entities.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 136
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Horse racing: imported harness or quarter horse races.

(1) Under existing law, the California Horse Racing Board is authorized to permit a harness or quarter horse association conducting a race meeting to accept wagers on the results of out-of-state or out-of-country harness or quarter horse races, and certain other designated harness or quarter horse races, if specified conditions are met. One of these conditions is that, if only one breed is being raced on a given day, the racing association conducting live racing may import those races that would otherwise be simulcast by the association which is not racing, subject to the limitation that the total number of harness or quarter horse races imported in a calendar year does not exceed the number of night races imported in 1998 after 5:30 p.m. This bill would delete that limitation regarding the total number of harness or quarter horse races imported in a calendar year. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 752
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
County employees' retirement: Orange County.

(1) The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 permits counties and districts, as defined, to provide retirement benefits to their employees pursuant to its provisions. The law permits the board of supervisors or the governing body of a district in Orange County, by resolution adopted by majority vote and pursuant to a memorandum of understanding, as specified, to make certain formulas for the calculation of benefits for general or safety members applicable to the employees of a bargaining unit comprised of general members, safety members, or employees of the Probation Services Unit and Probation Supervisory Management Unit, as specified, and requires the affected members, subject to certain conditions, to pay some or all of those additional contributions, as specified. This bill would permit, in Orange County, the board of supervisors, or the governing body of a district within the county, by resolution adopted by majority vote, to require an employee hired after approval of the resolution, to make a written election between 2 specified pension calculations within 45 days of beginning employment. The bill would require that an employee who fails to elect one of the pension calculations within 45 days of beginning employment be deemed to have elected the other. The bill would also permit the resolution, as described above, to require a current employee to make a similar written election regarding his or her own pension benefits for future service within 180 calendar days of approval of the resolution. The bill would require that a current employee who chooses to terminate a specified pension calculation be provided with a written explanation of the effect and impact of the termination and sign a specified affidavit. The bill would further permit the resolution to require a current employee of the county or district, hired before approval of the resolution, who subsequently becomes eligible for a specified pension calculation to make a one-time written election between the 2 pension calculations for future service within 45 days of becoming eligible. The bill would require that the employee who chooses to terminate a specified pension calculation be provided with a written explanation of the effect and impact of the termination and sign a specified affidavit. The bill would provide that failure to make an election within 45 calendar days shall be considered cause for termination of employment until the required election has been made. The bill would make these elections irrevocable, except as specified. The bill would require that a retirement allowance for service rendered prior to the effective date of the election be calculated under the employee's prior pension calculation and would provide that an employee who has made this election is not eligible for retirement unless the employee meets the minimum requirements of the provisions applicable at the date of retirement. The bill would require that specified pension elections include the signature of the employee's designated beneficiary or a specified written declaration. The bill would provide a civil penalty for a person who knowingly provides false information in the declaration, in an action to be brought at the option of a public prosecutor. The bill would require that an employee who elects the lesser of the 2 specified pension calculations be eligible to receive a contribution to a defined contribution program from the county or district based on the employee's contribution to a defined contribution program. The bill would permit the resolution to require a member who elects or is deemed to have elected the lesser of the 2 pension calculations to pay additional member contributions that would not result in an additional benefit to the member, as specified. The bill would permit the resolution to apply these provisions to unrepresented employees, as specified, and would provide that its provisions not be applicable to safety members of the retirement system. The bill would provide that an employee who fails to certify his or her election under specified circumstances would continue to be covered by his or her immediately preceding retirement plan, as specified. The bill would provide that the adoption of the resolution by the county would not extend to the employees of any district within the county, and would permit the governing body of a district to elect to make its provisions applicable to the employees of the district irrespective of whether the board of supervisors has made that election applicable to employees in the county. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 166
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Vessels: abandonment: abatement.

Existing law makes it an infraction with a minimum $500 fine and maximum $3,000 fine for a person to abandon a vessel upon a public waterway or public or private property without the express or implied consent of the owner or person in lawful possession or control of the property, except for the urgent and immediate concern for the safety of those aboard the vessel. Existing law provides that 80% of the moneys collected as fines shall be deposited in the Abandoned Watercraft Abatement Fund. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, moneys in the fund may be used for grants to be awarded by the Department of Boating and Waterways to local agencies for the abatement and removal of abandoned, wrecked, and dismantled vessels, or parts of those vessels. This bill would increase the minimum fine to $1,000. The bill would also allow the moneys in the fund to be used for the abatement and removal of a hulk, derelict, wreck, or parts of any ship, or other watercraft sunk, beached, or allowed to remain in an unseaworthy or dilapidated condition upon municipal or other public corporation property, and for the disposal of a surrendered vessel, as defined. This bill would prohibit the state from assuming liability for any injuries or damages to a person or entity, public or private, connected to or resulting from the processing or disposal of a surrendered vessel. These changes would be repealed as of January 1, 2014. Existing law authorizes wrecked property that is an unseaworthy derelict or hulk, or abandoned property removed from a navigable waterway, as specified, to be sold or otherwise disposed of by the public agency that removed or caused the removal of the property, subject to specified conditions, including that the property has been appraised by disinterested persons, and has an estimated value of less than $2,000. This bill would, until January 1, 2014, except from these specified conditions the removal and sale or disposition of a surrendered vessel, as defined. The bill would require the Department of Boating and Waterways to track the number of surrendered vessels accepted by a public agency that disposes of those vessels using grant funds from the Abandoned Watercraft Abatement Fund from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2013, inclusive, and the total amount of expenditure from that fund for surrendered vessels during the same period. The bill would require the department to report that information to the Assembly Committee on Transportation and the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Water with any recommendations for revising or continuing the use of fund moneys for those purposes.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 75
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to promotores and community health workers.

This measure would recognize the pioneering work of promotores and community health workers in delivering vital and cost-effective health care services in communities throughout California and declare October 2009 as California Promotores Month.

Signed into law Sep 29, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Showing 341 to 350 of 589 bills
Previous 1 … 34 35 36 … 59 Next