Photo of Jose Medina
D California Assembly · District 61 · Former member

Asm. Jose Medina

Compare
Total votes
20,618
all sessions
Attendance
97%
536 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
1,627
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
1,627 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,627
Primary
153
Co-sponsor
1,474
This page
1,627
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AJR 15
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to federal public lands.

This measure would urge the President of the United States, the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, and the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture to protect federal public lands and the economic, historical, cultural, and ecological values that they provide for Americans; to support the enactment and use of the Antiquities Act of 1906 as a critical tool for protecting the public good by authorizing the designation of national monuments under the Antiquities Act; and to honor and protect the integrity of all national monuments as they have been designated by Presidents of the United States since 1906.

Signed into law Jun 13, 2017 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 82
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Armed Forces.

This measure would honor and recognize the service and sacrifice made by members of the Armed Forces and their families on the occasion of Armed Forces Day on May 20, 2017.

Signed into law Jun 13, 2017 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 414
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Suspension and allocation of vacant judgeships.

Existing law specifies the number of judges for the superior court of each county. Existing law allocates additional judgeships to the various counties in accordance with uniform standards for factually determining additional judicial need in each county, as updated and approved by the Judicial Council, pursuant to the Update of Judicial Needs Study, based on specified criteria, including, among others, workload standards that represent the average amount of time of bench and nonbench work required to resolve each case type. This bill would require the suspension of 4 vacant judgeships, as defined, from superior courts with more authorized judgeships than their assessed judicial need and would require the allocation of 4 judgeships to superior courts with fewer authorized judgeships than their assessed judicial need. The bill would require the suspension and allocation of judgeships to be based on a superior court's assessed judicial need in accordance with the uniform standards described above. The bill would require the Judicial Council, if a vacant judgeship is eligible for suspension, to promptly notify the court with the vacant judgeship, the Legislature, and the Governor that the judgeship is subject to suspension, provide an adequate opportunity for public comment, and, after consideration of any comments received, determine if the vacant judgeship should be suspended. The bill would require the Judicial Council to promptly notify the court with the vacant judgeship, the Legislature, and the Governor of its decision regarding suspension of the judgeship. The bill would provide that a court in which a vacant judgeship is suspended will not have its funding allocation reduced or any of its funding shifted or transferred as a result of, or in connection with, the suspension of a vacant judgeship. This bill would also make a statement of legislative intent regarding the authority of the Legislature, the Governor, and the Chief Justice of California.

Passed Jun 13, 2017 0 co-sponsors
Showing 991 to 1,000 of 1,627 bills
Previous 1 … 99 100 101 … 163 Next