Photo of Kevin Kiley
R California Assembly · District 6

Asm. Kevin Kiley

Compare
Total votes
12,948
all sessions
Attendance
89%
1,186 missed
Lower than 90% of chamber peers
With party
98%
of cast votes
Lower than 89% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 92% of chamber peers
Sponsored
954
bills & resolutions
Lower than 78% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
954 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
954
Primary
152
Co-sponsor
802
This page
954
matching current filters
Primary AB 3216
In committee · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
School accountability: Open Enrollment Act: low-achieving schools.

(1) Commencing with the 2017–18 school year, the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, requires the state to identify schools for comprehensive support and improvement pursuant to specified accountability system requirements. Existing state law, the Open Enrollment Act (the act) , authorizes the parent of a pupil enrolled in a low-achieving school, as defined, to submit an application for the pupil to attend a school in a school district other than the school district in which the parent resides, as specified. The act defines "low-achieving school" to mean a school on a list created annually by the Superintendent of Public Instruction of 1,000 schools ranked by increasing Academic Performance Index scores with the same ratio of elementary, middle, and high schools as existed in decile 1 in the 2008–09 school year. Commencing July 1, 2020, this bill would instead define a "low-achieving school" for purposes of the act to include, among others, a school identified by the Superintendent or the State Board of Education for comprehensive support and improvement pursuant to federal specified accountability system requirements, including, among others, a school identified as being in the lowest performing 5% of all Title I schools, or a high school failing to graduate 13 or more of its pupils. The bill would provide that a "low-achieving school" shall not include a court, community, or community day school, limit the total number of low-achieving schools to no more than 1,000, and prohibit more than 10% of a local educational agency's schools from being low-performing. Commencing July 1, 2020, the bill would prohibit a school district of enrollment from not accepting transfers due to the costs associated with those transfers or because the pupil is special needs, including an individual with exceptional needs, or the pupil is an English learner, and would authorize a school district of residence to prohibit or limit transfers pursuant to the act only in specified circumstances relating to desegregation. Commencing July 1, 2020, the bill would require a school district of enrollment to provide transportation assistance to the school or program to a pupil who was accepted for transfer by a school district of enrollment pursuant to these provisions upon the request of the parent or guardian on behalf of the pupil if that pupil is eligible for free or reduced-price meals, and would authorize a school district of enrollment to provide transportation assistance to any pupil admitted under these provisions. The bill would also make conforming changes. To the extent the bill would expand the duties of school districts under the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The act encourages each school district to keep an accounting of all requests made for alternative attendance pursuant to the act and records of all disposition of those requests, as provided. Commencing July 1, 2020, this bill would instead require each school district of enrollment to keep that information and would require the Superintendent to collect that information, as provided. On or before July 1, 2020, the bill would require the Superintendent to report to the appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature, the Governor, and the Legislative Analyst's Office, the plan for collecting the information. Commencing July 1, 2020, the bill would require the school district of enrollment, on or before May 15 of each year, to report the information to each school district that is geographically adjacent, to its county office of education, and to the Superintendent, as specified, and would also require the Superintendent to annually make certain information available to the appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature, the Governor, and the Legislative Analyst's Office, as provided. To the extent the bill would expand the duties of school districts under the act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The act requires the Superintendent to contract for an independent evaluation of the open enrollment program, as provided. Existing law requires the Superintendent to provide a final evaluation report to the Legislature, Governor, and State Board of Education on or before October 1, 2014. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to complete an evaluation of, and to make recommendations on, the open enrollment program, as provided. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to submit the final evaluation report to the Legislature, Governor, and state board on or before December 1, 2023. The bill would require the Superintendent to provide the data necessary to complete the report to the Legislative Analyst's Office by December 1, 2022. (4) This bill would make the act inoperative on July 1, 2024, and would repeal the act as of January 1, 2025. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

In committee Apr 25, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 2409
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Professions and vocations: occupational regulations.

Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations by boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs and provides that those boards are established for the purpose of ensuring that those private businesses and professions deemed to engage in activities that have potential impact upon the public health, safety, and welfare are adequately regulated in order to protect the people of California. Existing law authorizes a board to deny a license if an applicant has been convicted of a crime, done any act involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit with intent to substantially benefit himself or herself or another or substantially injure another, or does any act that, if done by a licentiate of the business or profession, would be grounds for suspension or revocation. This bill would establish that a person has a right to engage in a lawful profession or vocation without being subject to an occupational regulation, as defined, that imposes a substantial burden on that right, and would require each occupational regulation to be limited to what is demonstrably necessary and narrowly tailored to fulfill a legitimate public health, safety, or welfare objective. The bill would include within this the right of a person with a criminal record to not have the person's criminal record used by a board as an automatic or mandatory permanent bar to engaging in a lawful profession or vocation, except as specified, and the right of a person who is behind on his or her taxes or student loan payments to not have a board use that fact as an automatic or mandatory permanent bar to engaging in a lawful profession or vocation. The bill would authorize a person to petition a board to review an occupational regulation, as defined, within the board's jurisdiction for compliance with the above rights, as specified. The bill would authorize a person with a criminal record to petition a board at any time for a determination of whether the person's criminal record will automatically disqualify the person from obtaining a license from the board and would specify the criteria a board is allowed to use in making that determination. The bill would include related definitions and declare the intent of the Legislature in this regard.

Failed Apr 17, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 178
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Irish American Heritage Month.

This measure would designate March 2018 as Irish American Heritage Month in honor of the multitude of contributions that Irish Americans have made to the country and state.

Signed into law Apr 13, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 193
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Girl Scouts.

This measure would resolve that the Legislature is proud to join the Girl Scouts of the USA in recognizing their 106th Anniversary.

Signed into law Apr 13, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Showing 721 to 730 of 954 bills
Previous 1 … 72 73 74 … 96 Next