Photo of Kevin Kiley
R California Assembly · District 6

Asm. Kevin Kiley

Compare
Total votes
12,948
all sessions
Attendance
89%
1,186 missed
Lower than 90% of chamber peers
With party
98%
of cast votes
Lower than 89% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 92% of chamber peers
Sponsored
954
bills & resolutions
Lower than 78% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
954 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
954
Primary
152
Co-sponsor
802
This page
954
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SCR 126
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to the 50th Anniversary of the Napa County Agricultural Preserve.

This measure would recognize 2018 as the milestone 50th Anniversary of the Napa County Agricultural Preserve, and further recognize the critical part the hundreds of growers, vintners, local leaders, and members of the Napa community play to preserve the beauty and splendor of the valley and its agricultural industries, for this and future generations.

Signed into law May 8, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 208
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Wines: Down to Earth Month.

This measure would proclaim the month of April 2018 as California Wines: Down to Earth Month, to celebrate the sustainable leadership of California wineries and winegrape growers throughout the month of April.

Signed into law May 3, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2651
In committee · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Civil actions.

(1) Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication in a civil action or proceeding to be heard no later than 30 days before the date of the trial in the action or proceeding. Existing law requires a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication to include a separate statement of undisputed facts, and opposition papers to include a separate statement that responds to each material fact contended by the moving party to be undisputed. Existing law requires opposition to a motion to be served and filed not less than 14 days before the date of the hearing motion, and a reply to the opposition to be served and filed not less than 5 days before the hearing on the motion. This bill would instead require the motion to be heard no later than 45 days before the date of trial. The bill would authorize the moving party to arrange the separate statement of undisputed facts by cause of action or count, and would require the separate statement filed in support of any opposition to be arranged in the same order as the moving party's separate statement with respect to facts contended to be undisputed. The bill would require opposition to a motion to be filed and served not less than 20 court days before the hearing, and require a reply to be filed and served not less than 10 court days before the hearing. (2) Existing law authorizes a court to determine a motion for a new trial or a motion to set aside and vacate a judgment within 60 days after the mailing of notice of entry of judgment by the clerk of the court, or 60 days after service on the moving party by any party of written notice of entry of judgment, or, if that notice has not been given, within 60 days after filing the first notice of intention to move for a new trial or to set aside and vacate a judgment. This bill would extend each of the periods described above to 75 days. (3) Existing law requires an expert witness who is a party or an employee of a party to an action, or who has been retained by a party for the purpose of forming and expressing an opinion in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial of the action, to produce any material or category of materials called for by a deposition notice no later than 3 business days before his or her deposition. Existing law requires the party taking the deposition of an expert witness to either accompany the service of the deposition notice with a tender of the expert's fee, or tender that fee at the commencement of the deposition. This bill would authorize the continuance of the expert's deposition if the expert does not timely produce materials, and would require the party designating the expert to be responsible for payment of the expert's fee at the continued deposition. The bill would provide that no other expert's deposition may be required until the continued deposition is concluded.

In committee May 2, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 198
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: 50th anniversary of assassination.

This measure would recognize Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on April 4, 2018, the 50th anniversary of his assassination, his numerous accomplishments and contributions to the nation, and the long-lasting influence that his words and legacy continue to have globally.

Signed into law May 1, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Showing 701 to 710 of 954 bills
Previous 1 … 70 71 72 … 96 Next