Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to provide a ballot title for each measure to be submitted to the voters at a statewide election. The Attorney General is required to prepare a summary of the chief purposes and points of a statewide ballot measure as part of the ballot title and return the measure with the ballot title and summary to the Secretary of State. Upon receipt of the ballot title and summary, the Secretary of State is required to send notification of the filing deadline and the certification deadline to the proponents of the measure and to the county elections official. This bill would revise the provisions relating to the duties of the Attorney General and Secretary of State regarding state ballot measures and the provisions relating to proponents of a ballot measure. The bill would add and revise related definitions. This bill would incorporate changes made by AB 894 that would become operative only if both bills are enacted and this bill is enacted after AB 894.
Sponsored bills
(1) Existing law extends by 24 months the expiration date of any tentative or vesting tentative subdivision map or parcel map, as the case may be, for which a tentative or vesting tentative map has been approved that had not expired as of July 15, 2009, and that will expire before January 1, 2012. Existing law prohibits a city, county, or city and county from requiring as a condition to the issuance of any building permit or equivalent permit for single- or multiple-family residential units conformance with or the performance of any conditions that the city, county, or city and county could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map for a period of 3 years following recordation of the final map or parcel map for the subdivision. This bill would maintain this provision but recast it within the Government Code. (2) Notwithstanding the above provision, existing law provides that a city, county, or city and county is not prohibited from levying a fee or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit or after the issuance. This bill would delete this provision and instead provide that, for purposes only of a tentative subdivision map or parcel map that is extended by 24 months pursuant to a specified law, a city, county, or city and county is not prohibited from levying a fee or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee, including an adopted fee that is not included within an applicable zoning ordinance, upon the issuance of a building permit. (3) The Mitigation Fee Act requires a local agency to hold a public hearing, at which oral or written presentations can be made, as part of a regularly scheduled meeting prior to adopting an ordinance, resolution, or other legislative enactment adopting a specified type of new fee or approving an increase in a specified type of existing fee. The act also requires the local agency to publish, in accordance with a specified provision of law, notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered. The act provides that any cost incurred by a local agency in conducting the hearing may be recovered as part of the fees which were the subject of the hearing. This bill would additionally require a city, county, or city and county to mail notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered and a statement that specified data is available, at least 14 days prior to the first meeting to any interested party who has filed a written request with the city, county, or city and county for mailed notice of a meeting on a new or increased fee to be enacted by the city, county, or city and county. The bill would authorize the legislative body of the city, county, or city and county to establish a reasonable annual charge for sending notices based on the estimated cost of providing the service. The bill would also authorize the legislative body to send the notices electronically. The bill would require a city, county, or city and county to make available to the public data indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the public facilities and the revenue sources anticipated to fund those public facilities, including general fund revenues. The bill would also require any new or increased fee adopted by a city, county, or city and county to be effective no earlier than 60 days following the final action on the adoption or increase of the fee, unless the city, county, or city and county follows specified procedures. By adding to the duties of cities, counties, and cities and counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county that receives a request for mailed notice pursuant to the above provision, or a local agency that receives a request for mailed notice pursuant to another specified provision, to provide notice via electronic mail for those who specifically request electronic mail notification. The bill would specify that this electronic mail notification operates as an alternative to the mailed notice required by the above provisions. (4) Existing law authorizes any person to request an audit to determine whether any fee or charge levied by a local agency exceeds the amount reasonably necessary to cover the cost of any product or service provided by the local agency. If a person makes that request, the legislative body of the local agency is authorized to retain an independent auditor to conduct an audit to determine whether the fee or charge is reasonable. The local agency is authorized to recover the cost of having the audit conducted by an independent auditor from the person who requests the audit, and the audit is required to conform to generally accepted auditing standards. This bill would additionally authorize any person to request an audit to determine whether any fee or charge levied by a local agency exceeds the amount reasonably necessary to cover the cost of any public facility, as defined, provided by the local agency. The bill would also require the local agency to retain an independent auditor only if the person requesting the audit deposits with the local agency the amount of the agency's reasonable estimation of the cost of the audit. The bill would require the local agency to adjust the amount of any fee or charge to the extent it determines that the fee or charge does not meet specified requirements. By adding to the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
This measure would recognize the pioneering work of promotores and community health workers in delivering vital and cost-effective health care services in communities throughout California and declare October 2009 as California Promotores Month.
This measure would make various statements regarding the importance of New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (NUMMI) to the California economy and would declare the necessity for the Legislature to utilize its vested powers to keep NUMMI in California.
This measure would proclaim October 23 to October 31, 2009, inclusive, as Red Ribbon Week, and would encourage all Californians to help build drug-free communities and participate in drug prevention activities.
This measure would recognize the importance of California Native American Day, celebrated this year on September 25, 2009, and the concurrent California Indian Cultural Awareness Conference to the enhancement of awareness of California Indian culture.
This measure would designate the month of October 2009, and every October thereafter, as Italian American Heritage Month. This measure would encourage public schools to highlight and include Italian American achievements and contributions to the culture of California and to take steps to promote the inclusion of the role and contributions of Italian Americans to the culture and history of California and the United States in elementary and secondary social science textbooks during the revision process for those textbooks.
This measure would urge the State Air Resources Board to meet the statutory requirements of the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 by ensuring that its analysis of specified emission reduction measures include prescribed components.
This measure would designate specified portions of State Highway Route 60 and corresponding on ramps and off ramps as the CHP Officer Joseph P. Sanders Memorial Highway.
This measure would acknowledge December 17 each year as an annual "Day of Inclusion" in recognition and appreciation of the priceless contributions of all immigrants to the greatness of the United States and California.