Photo of Cristina Garcia
D California Assembly · District 58

Asm. Cristina Garcia

Compare
Total votes
16,426
all sessions
Attendance
92%
1,128 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Higher than 79% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 84% of chamber peers
Sponsored
1,693
bills & resolutions
Higher than 98% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
1,693 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,693
Primary
143
Co-sponsor
1,550
This page
1,693
matching current filters
Primary AB 31
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Members of the Legislature and Congress: domicile: voting fraud.

Existing law provides that a person's residence for voting purposes means a person's domicile, and that a person may only have one domicile. Existing law defines domicile to be the place in which a person's habitation is fixed and where the person intends to remain or return to whenever absent. Existing law also provides that, for purposes of determining the domicile of a Member of the Legislature or a Representative in the Congress of the United States, it shall be conclusively presumed that the residence address indicated on that person's currently filed affidavit of voter registration is that person's domicile. This bill would clarify that the conclusive presumption applies only if the address indicated on that person's currently filed affidavit of voter registration is a place in which the person's habitation is fixed for some period of time. Existing law permits a person who qualifies and is registered to vote to vote at any election held within the territory within which he or she resides and the election is held. Existing law makes it a crime for a person who is not entitled to vote at an election to fraudulently vote or fraudulently attempt to vote at that election. This bill would require the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute any violation of that penal provision relating to a fraudulent vote or fraudulent attempt to vote in a jurisdiction in which the person does not reside for voting purposes.

Failed Feb 1, 2016 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1074
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Alternative fuels: infrastructure.

The Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act establishes the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and requires the commission to prepare a biennial integrated energy policy report containing an overview of major energy trends and issues facing the state, including supply, demand, pricing, reliability, efficiency, and impacts on public health and safety, the economy, resources, and the environment. The commission is required to make recommendations to improve the efficiency of transportation energy use, reduce dependence on petroleum fuels, decrease environmental impacts from transportation energy use, and contribute to reducing congestion, promoting economic development, and enhancing energy diversity and security. Existing law authorizes the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation, and Conservation District and specified harbor and port districts, as defined, to jointly, with an electrical corporation, gas corporation, community choice aggregator established on or before July 1, 2013, or publicly owned electric or gas utility serving the district, to prepare one or more energy management plans to reduce air emissions and promote economic development through the addition of new businesses and the retention of existing businesses in the district. Existing law requires that if a district prepares an energy management plan pursuant to these provisions, that the plan include specified provisions. This bill would add a definition of "alternative fuel" and would provide that it is the policy of the state to help accelerate the adoption of vehicles using alternative fuels throughout the state by increasing the amount of charging and refueling options needed to facilitate electric, hydrogen, and natural gas vehicles traveling along all passenger and goods movement corridors on federal and state highways. The bill would require the commission to conduct an assessment and develop an integrated strategy to maximize the benefits and scope of an alternative refueling infrastructure, as defined, to help the state achieve its climate change, air quality, and economic goals and this newly stated policy. The bill would require the commission, as part of this assessment and strategy, to develop a refueling infrastructure plan that identifies specified matter and to provide the infrastructure plan to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2017.

Failed Feb 1, 2016 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SCR 88
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Human Trafficking Awareness Month.

This measure would proclaim the month of January 2016 as Human Trafficking Awareness Month, encourage all Californians to become educated about human trafficking and work to eradicate these criminal practices within and beyond our borders, and encourage Members of the Legislature, as well as organizations, businesses, and individuals, to host or sponsor and attend community events in order to bring visibility and support to efforts made by nongovernmental organizations to recognize and combat human trafficking.

Signed into law Feb 1, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1009
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Local government: redevelopment: revenues from property tax override rates.

Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires revenues equivalent to those that would have been allocated to each redevelopment agency, had the agency not been dissolved, to be allocated to the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund of each successor agency for making payments on the principal of and interest on loans, and moneys advanced to or indebtedness incurred by the dissolved redevelopment agencies. Existing law requires, from February 1, 2012, to July 1, 2012, inclusive, and for each fiscal year thereafter, the county auditor-controller, after deducting administrative costs, to allocate property tax revenues in each Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund in a specified manner. This bill would authorize a city or county that levies a property tax rate, approved by the voters of a city or county to make payments in support of pension programs and levied in addition to the general property tax rate, to make a request to an oversight board to prohibit revenues derived from that property tax rate from being deposited into a Redevelopment Property Tax Fund. This bill would authorize an oversight board to deny this request based on substantial evidence that a former redevelopment agency made a pledge of revenues that specifically included revenues derived from the imposition of that property tax rate. This bill, for the 2015–16 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, except to the extent an oversight board denies a request, would prohibit any revenues derived from the imposition of that property tax rate from being allocated to a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund and would, instead, require these revenues to be allocated to, and when collected to be paid into, the fund of the city or county whose voters approved the tax. The bill would require all allocations of revenues derived from the imposition of that property tax rate made by any county auditor-controller prior to July 1, 2015, to be deemed correct, and would prohibit any city, county, county auditor-controller, successor agency, or affected taxing entity from being subject to any claim, as specified. This bill would require, to the extent that revenues derived from the imposition of a property tax rate, approved by the voters of a city or county to make payments in support of pension programs and levied in addition to the general property tax rate, are deposited into a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, the county-auditor controller to allocate moneys from each Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to a city or county that levies a property tax as so described after certain other allocations have been made. By adding to the duties of local government officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Feb 1, 2016 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 319
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Pupil instruction: cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Existing law authorizes a school district or school to provide a comprehensive program in first aid or cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, or both, to pupils and employees in accordance with specified guidelines. Existing law establishes a list of courses that a pupil in a school district is required to complete in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, in order to receive a diploma of graduation from high school, including 2 courses in physical education unless exempted. This bill would require, commencing with the 2017–18 academic year, the governing board of a school district, and the governing body of a charter school, offering instruction to pupils in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to provide instruction on performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of an automated external defibrillator as part of a physical education course or another course required for graduation, as provided. The bill would also make conforming changes to a related code section. By imposing additional requirements on school districts and charter schools, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Failed Feb 1, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 188
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Child care: alternative payment providers: reimbursement rates: eligibility requirements.

Existing law requires the State Department of Education to contract with local contracting agencies for alternative payment programs that are intended to allow for maximum parental choice in child care. Existing law requires reimbursement for alternative payment programs to include the cost of child care paid to child care providers plus the administrative and support services costs of the alternative payment program, as provided, and limits the total cost for administration and support services to an amount not to exceed 17.5% of the total contract amount. This bill would also require alternative payment programs to be reimbursed for making eligibility determinations at a rate of three percent of the total contract amount.

Failed Feb 1, 2016 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 74
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Child care facilities: regulatory visits.

Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services regulates the licensure and operation of child day care centers and family day care homes, and is required to inspect these centers or homes at least once every 5 years and, beginning January 1, 2017, at least once every 3 years. Existing law provides that a child day care center or family day care home is subject to an unannounced inspection by the department, and requires the department to conduct an annual unannounced inspection under specified circumstances, including when a license is on probation, and to conduct annual unannounced inspections of no less than 20%, and commencing January 1, 2017, 30% of these centers or homes that are not subject to an inspection under those specified circumstances. This bill would revise the provisions requiring the department to conduct annual unannounced inspections of a child day care center or family day care home by instead requiring the department to conduct annual unannounced inspections of no less than 20% of those centers or homes on and after January 1, 2018, and until January 1, 2019. The bill would also require, on and after January 1, 2018, and until January 1, 2019, the department to inspect each center or home at least every 2 years. Beginning January 1, 2019, the bill would require the department to conduct an annual unannounced inspection of each child day care center or family day care home.

Vetoed Jan 15, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 101
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Pupil instruction: ethnic studies.

Existing law requires the adopted course of study for grades 7 to 12, inclusive, to include, among other subjects, the social sciences. Existing law requires the State Board of Education, with the assistance of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, to establish a list of textbooks and other instructional materials that highlight the contributions of minorities in the development of California and the United States. This bill would require the Superintendent to oversee the development of, and the state board to adopt, a model curriculum to ensure quality courses in ethnic studies. The bill would require the Superintendent to establish an Ethnic Studies Advisory Committee and would require the committee to advise, assist, and make recommendations to the Superintendent regarding the development of the model curriculum. The bill would, beginning the school year following the adoption of the model curriculum, authorize each school district maintaining any of grades 7 to 12, inclusive, to offer, as an elective in the social sciences, a course of study in ethnic studies based on the model curriculum.

Vetoed Jan 15, 2016 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1232
Vetoed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Insurance Commissioner: administrative hearings.

Existing law grants the Insurance Commissioner certain powers and duties. Existing law prohibits the commissioner from denying an insurance agent or broker license to an applicant without an opportunity to be heard. The hearing is required to be conducted in accordance with specified provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. This bill would, if the applicant or permanent licensee is a natural person and requests a hearing, authorize the person, at his or her option, to have the hearing held by either the Office of Administrative Hearings, or an administrative law judge appointed by the commissioner to conduct the hearing. If the natural person does not indicate a preference of forum when requesting that hearing, the bill would authorize the commissioner to refer the matter for hearing to either the Office of Administrative Hearings, or to an administrative law judge appointed by the commissioner to conduct the hearing. Existing law also requires the commissioner to make an annual report to the Governor, the Legislature, and the committees of the Senate and Assembly having jurisdiction over insurance showing, generally, the condition of the insurance business and interests in this state, and other matters concerning insurance, as specified. This bill would require the commissioner, for 3 calendar years, to include in the report described above specified information regarding those cases in which a hearing was held, including the total number of cases in which a hearing was held and the average number of days that elapsed between the referral of a case to an administrative law judge and a proposed decision by that administrative law judge.

Vetoed Jan 15, 2016 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1,491 to 1,500 of 1,693 bills