Photo of Miguel Santiago
D California Assembly · District 54 · Former member

Asm. Miguel Santiago

Contact Email
Compare
Total votes
24,138
all sessions
Attendance
98%
333 missed
Higher than 98% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Higher than 90% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 93% of chamber peers
Sponsored
1,963
bills & resolutions
Higher than 76% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
1,963 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,963
Primary
251
Co-sponsor
1,712
This page
1,963
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SCR 107
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to developmental services.

This measure would declare the intent of the Legislature to further support the housing needs of individuals with developmental disabilities by exploring models that facilitate the private donation of homes in perpetuity and would recognize the work of organizations that have developed a property donation program.

Signed into law Aug 15, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 121
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Eagle Staff.

This measure would recognize the history and significance of the Eagle Staff to Native American tribes. The measure would express the Legislature's commitment to inclusiveness for all Native Americans and respect for the traditions and symbolism of the Eagle Staff and would urge state government departments to incorporate these principles into their policies and practices.

Signed into law Aug 10, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 146
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Grown Flower Month.

This measure would proclaim June 2018 as California Grown Flower Month to recognize and honor the people of the California grown flower industry for their dedication and productivity.

Signed into law Aug 9, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 45
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the 68th anniversary of the Korean War.

This measure would, among other things, mark June 25, 2018, as the 68th anniversary of the Korean War and encourage participants in specified discussions regarding North and South Korea to have a sincere intention of achieving peace in the region.

Passed Aug 6, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1937
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Public employment: payroll deductions.

(1) Existing law prescribes various duties of the Controller in connection with deductions requested by employee organizations and other bona fide organizations regarding requests for deductions from the salaries and wages of their members. Existing law defines employee organization in this context as one which represents employees of the state or the California State University and which is registered or recognized, as specified, and defines bona fide organization as an organization of employees or former employees of an agency of the state and the California State University, which does not have as one of its purposes representing employees in their employment relations. Existing law prescribes the duties of the governing boards of school districts in regard to requests by certificated employees for deductions from the salaries and wages, and prescribes similar duties for the governing boards of community college districts. Existing law authorizes a trial court employee or interpreter to permit a dues deduction from his or her salary in the same manner provided to public agency employees pursuant to specified law applicable to the state and the Controller, as described above. This bill would revise and recast these provisions. The bill would expand certain authorizations and requirements currently applicable to the Controller and employees of the state and California State University to apply also to the Regents of the University of California, the Judicial Council, counties, cities, and public authorities, including transit districts, among others, and would correspondingly broaden the definition of an employee organization. In this context, the bill would authorize employee organizations and bona fide associations to request payroll deductions and would require public employers to honor these requests. The bill would require public employers to make rules and regulations for the administration of specified payroll deductions, subject to meeting and conferring with the applicable employee organizations. The bill would prohibit requiring an employee organization that certifies that it has and will maintain individual employee authorizations to provide a copy of an individual authorization to the public employer or the Controller unless a dispute arises about the existence or terms of the authorization. The bill would authorize charging an employee organization reasonable one-time startup costs, if any, for making deductions. The bill would specify when deductions are to commence following notification from an employee organization. The bill would permit a deduction for an employee organization to be revoked only pursuant to the terms of the employee's written authorization. The bill would require the public employer or Controller to rely on information provided by the employee organization regarding whether the request is in conformity with the authorization. The bill would require the employee organization to indemnify the public employer or Controller for any claims made by employees for deductions made in reliance on information provided by the employee organization. The bill would revise authorizations granted to employees and retired employees to make deductions for dues in, and for services provided by, a bona fide organization, as specified, instead to apply to employee organizations for dues in, or for any other service, program, or committee provided or sponsored by, an employee organization and would eliminate the requirement of public agency approval for these deductions. The bill would require employers to honor these authorizations and would require that the revocability of an authorization be determined by the terms of the authorization. The bill would repeal certain requirements dealing with payroll deduction for state employees of public agencies, other than those under the uniform payroll system. The bill would apply the changes described above to trial court employees and court interpreters, as specified. With regard to school district and community college district employers and employees, the bill would expand the authorization granted to certificated and academic employees to request salary deductions to apply also to dues in, or for any other service, program, or committee provided or sponsored by, an applicable employee organization, as specified. The bill would require reasonable, one-time startup costs of making deductions to be charged. The bill would require employee authorizations to be revoked according to their written terms. The bill would require these employers to honor the terms of employee written authorizations. The bill would require the employers to rely on information provided by the employee organization regarding whether the request is in conformity with the authorization, as described above. The bill would also prescribe when deductions are to commence, following notification from employee organizations, and would prohibit requiring the employee organizations to provide a copy of an authorization unless a dispute arises, as specified. The bill would require employee organizations to indemnify the public school employers or community college districts for any claims made by employees for deductions made in reliance on specified assertions. By increasing the duties of local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Passed Aug 6, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 2644
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Dolores Huerta Day.

Existing law requires the Governor to proclaim certain days each year for specified reasons. Existing law also designates particular days each year as having special significance and encourages all public schools and educational institutions to observe those days and to conduct suitable commemorative exercises on those days. This bill would require the Governor to annually proclaim April 10 as Dolores Huerta Day, would designate and set apart that date each year as having special significance, and would encourage all public schools and educational institutions to observe that date by conducting exercises remembering the life of Dolores Huerta and recognizing her accomplishments and the contributions she made to the state.

Signed into law Jul 18, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 246
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to World Oceans Day.

This measure would recognize June 8 as World Oceans Day, and would declare that the Legislature intends to act decisively in 2018 in regard to passing legislation aimed at reducing plastic pollution in California rivers, beaches, and ocean, and would further declare that the State of California is determined to seek additional ways to curb plastic pollution on those waterways and beaches, and in other natural spaces and communities.

Signed into law Jul 10, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 251
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Philippine Independence Day.

This measure would recognize June 12, 2018, as the 120th Anniversary of Philippine Independence and would call upon the people of the state to observe the month of June with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activities.

Signed into law Jul 10, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Showing 1,401 to 1,410 of 1,963 bills