Photo of Roger Hernández
D California Assembly · District 48

Asm. Roger Hernández

Compare
Total votes
13,497
all sessions
Attendance
89%
1,261 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
648
bills & resolutions
Higher than 77% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
648 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
648
Primary
131
Co-sponsor
517
This page
648
matching current filters
Primary AB 2751
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Retaliation.

Existing law prohibits an employer from discharging an employee or in any manner discriminating, retaliating, or taking any adverse action against any employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant has engaged in protected conduct, as specified. Existing law provides that an employee who made a bona fide complaint, and was consequently discharged or otherwise suffered an adverse action, is entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for an employer to willfully refuse to reinstate or otherwise restore an employee who is determined by a specified procedure to be eligible for reinstatement. Existing law subjects a person who violates these provisions to a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. This bill would require the $10,000 penalty to be awarded to the employee or employees who suffered the violation. Existing law prohibits an employer or any other person from engaging in, or directing another person to engage in, an unfair immigration-related practice against a person for the purpose of, or with the intent of, retaliating against any person for exercising a right protected under state labor and employment laws or under a local ordinance applicable to employees, as specified. Existing law defines unfair immigration-related practice to include, among other things, threatening to file or filing a false police report. Existing law creates a rebuttable presumption that an adverse action taken within 90 days of the exercising of a protected right is committed for the purpose of, or with the intent of, retaliation. Existing law authorizes a civil action for equitable relief and damages or penalties, as specified, by an employee or other person who is the subject of an unfair immigration-related practice. Existing law also authorizes a court to order the appropriate government agencies to suspend certain business licenses held by the violating party for prescribed periods based on the number of violations, and requires the court to consider specified circumstances in determining whether a suspension of all licenses is appropriate. This bill would include in the definition of unfair immigration-related practice the threatening to file or the filing of a false report or complaint with any state or federal agency. The bill would authorize a civil action for equitable relief and any applicable damages or penalties by an employee or other person who is the subject of an unfair immigration-related practice. The bill would further authorize a court to order, upon application by a party or on its own motion, the appropriate government agencies to suspend certain business licenses held by the violating party for prescribed periods based on the number of violations. Existing law prohibits an employer from discharging an employee or in any manner discriminating, retaliating, or taking any adverse action against an employee because the employee updates or attempts to update his or her personal information, unless the changes are directly related to the skill set, qualifications, or knowledge required for the job. This bill would prohibit an employer from discharging or in any manner discriminating, retaliating, or taking any adverse action against an employee because the employee updates or attempts to update personal information based on a lawful change of name, social security number, or federal employment authorization document. The bill would prohibit an employer's compliance with these provisions from serving as the basis for a claim of discrimination, including any disparate treatment claim.

Signed into law Jun 28, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SCR 120
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Year of the Community: developmental disabilities.

This measure would proclaim the year of 2014 as the "Year of the Community," and would declare that the Legislature will actively promote the rights of persons with developmental disabilities and their full inclusion into community life.

Signed into law Jun 16, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 115
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Museum Month.

This measure would recognize the essential role that museums have in the State of California as educational institutions and would proclaim May 2014 as California Museum Month.

Signed into law Jun 10, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 110
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Health Care District Month.

This measure would recognize the essential role that health care districts have in the State of California and proclaims the month of May 2014 as Health Care District Month in California.

Signed into law Jun 10, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 131
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Armed Forces.

This measure would honor and recognize the service and sacrifice made by members of the Armed Forces and their families on the occasion of Armed Forces Day on May 17, 2014.

Signed into law Jun 10, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Showing 291 to 300 of 648 bills
Previous 1 … 29 30 31 … 65 Next