Photo of Blanca Rubio
D California Assembly · District 48 On the 2026 ballot

Asm. Blanca Rubio

Compare
Total votes
20,908
all sessions
Attendance
93%
1,294 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
1,471
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
7
assignments
1,471 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,471
Primary
119
Co-sponsor
1,352
This page
1,471
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 163
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to adult education.

This bill would proclaim the week of March 27, 2022, to April 2, 2022, inclusive, as Adult Education Week, and would honor the teachers, administrators, classified staff, and students of adult education programs statewide for their efforts, persistence, and accomplishments.

Signed into law May 10, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 165
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to World Autism Awareness Day.

This measure would designate April 2, 2022, as World Autism Awareness Day and encourage residents of the state to show support for autism awareness.

Signed into law May 10, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2792
In committee · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Cannabis: excise tax: cultivation tax.

(1) The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. AUMA imposes an excise tax on upon purchasers of cannabis or cannabis products sold in this state at the rate of 15% of the average market price of any retail sale by a cannabis retailer. Existing law defines average market price in an arm's length transaction to mean the average retail price determined by the wholesale cost of the cannabis or cannabis products sold or transferred to a cannabis retailer, plus a markup, as determined by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration on a biannual basis in 6-month intervals. Existing law prohibited the department from increasing the markup amount during the period beginning on and after September 18, 2020, and before July 1, 2021. AUMA imposes a separate cultivation tax on harvested cannabis that enters the commercial market, as specified. Existing law, beginning January 1, 2020, requires the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to adjust the cultivation tax rate for inflation each calendar year, except for the 2021 calendar year, in which existing law prohibited the department from adjusting for inflation unless the adjustment was for an inflation rate less than zero. MAUCRSA, for purposes of the California Cannabis Equity Act, requires the Department of Cannabis Control to develop and implement a program to provide waivers and deferrals for application fees, licensing fees, and renewal fees required by MAUCRSA, as specified. This bill, from July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2025, inclusive, would prohibit the department from including any markup amount in the average market price in an arm's length transaction for purposes of the cannabis excise tax, and would reduce the rate of the cannabis excise tax imposed on purchasers in a nonarm's length transaction to 8%. The bill, from July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2025, inclusive, would suspend the imposition of the excise tax upon purchasers of cannabis or cannabis products sold in this state by licensees eligible for a fee waiver or deferral pursuant to the program established by the Department of Cannabis Control under the California Cannabis Equity Act. The bill would also suspend the imposition of the cultivation tax from July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2025, inclusive, and would discontinue the requirement that the department adjust the cultivation tax rate for inflation during the suspension. (2) AUMA requires the cannabis retailer to collect the cannabis excise tax from the purchaser and to remit that tax to a distributor. Existing law requires the distributor to collect the cannabis excise tax from the cannabis retailer on or before 90 days after the sale or transfer of cannabis or cannabis product to the cannabis retailer, as specified, and requires the distributor to collect the cultivation tax from a cultivator on all harvested cannabis that enters the commercial market, except as specified. Existing law requires the distributor to remit the cannabis excise tax and the cultivation tax to the department quarterly on or before the last day of the month following each quarterly period of 3 months. Existing law requires revenues from the excise and cultivation taxes to be deposited into the California Cannabis Tax Fund, which is continuously appropriated for specified purposes. This bill would instead require the distributor to collect the cannabis excise tax from the cannabis retailer on or before 90 days after the cannabis or cannabis product was sold or transferred by the cannabis retailer to the purchaser. The bill would require the distributor to remit the cannabis excise taxes and cultivation taxes to the department quarterly on or before the last day of the month following the quarterly period in which the distributor collected the tax. This bill would additionally state that any tax owed by a cultivator or cannabis retailer that has not been collected by a distributor is deemed a debt owed to the State of California by the cultivator or cannabis retailer. (3) AUMA authorizes legislative amendment of its provisions with a 23 vote of both houses, without submission to the voters, to further its purposes and intent. This bill would declare that its provisions further the purposes and intent of AUMA. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

In committee Apr 26, 2022 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 2605
In committee · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Water quality: state certification.

Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards prescribe waste discharge requirements in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Under federal law, any applicant seeking a federal license or permit for an activity that may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the United States is required to first seek a state water quality certification, as specified. The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act authorizes the state board to certify or provide a statement to a federal agency, as required pursuant to federal law, that there is reasonable assurance that an activity of any person subject to the jurisdiction of the state board will not reduce water quality below applicable standards. The federal act provides that if a state fails or refuses to act on a request for this certification within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed one year after receipt of the request, then the state certification requirements are waived with respect to the federal application. This bill would authorize the state board to delegate its authority regarding the above-described issuance of a certificate or statement to the regional boards. The bill would require a project proponent, as defined, to request a prefiling meeting with the state board, as specified. The bill would require the state board to act on the certification request within 60 days, except as specified. The bill would require a certification request to the state board for either an individual license or permit or a general license or permit to contain specified information. The bill would require the state board to take specified actions depending on whether it grants, grants with conditions, or denies the certification request.

In committee Apr 26, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Showing 1,161 to 1,170 of 1,471 bills