MF
D California Assembly · District 42

Asm. Mike Feuer

Compare
Total votes
13,970
all sessions
Attendance
99%
78 missed
Higher than 90% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
575
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
575 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
575
Primary
120
Co-sponsor
455
This page
575
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SCR 9
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Fresno Food Expo.

This measure would declare March 11, 2011, as Fresno Food Expo Day, and honor the Central San Joaquin Valley for its contribution to California, the nation, and globally for its abundant production of agricultural goods and food production.

Signed into law Mar 10, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 8
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to American Heart Month and Wear Red Day.

This measure would recognize the month of February 2011 as American Heart Month in California, would recognize February 4, 2011, as Wear Red Day in California, and would urge public support for Go Red for Women events.

Signed into law Feb 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 2
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Spay Day USA 2011.

This measure would declare February 22, 2011, to be Spay Day USA 2011 in California, and would request that Californians observe that day by having their dogs and cats spayed or neutered and by contributing to organizations that provide spay and neuter services.

Passed Feb 23, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 19
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Black History Month.

This measure would recognize February 2011 as Black History Month, urge all citizens to join in celebrating the accomplishments of African Americans during Black History Month, and encourage the people of California to recognize the many talents, achievements, and contributions that African Americans make to their communities.

Passed Feb 23, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 5
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.

This measure would designate that January 17, 2011, be observed as the official memorial of the late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birth, commemorate Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, the work of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Civil Rights Movement in changing public policy in California and in the United States of America.

Passed Jan 24, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 632
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Government compensation: disclosure.

(1) Existing law charges the Controller with various duties, including, among others, superintending the fiscal concerns of the state. Existing law authorizes a city council to enact an ordinance providing each member of the city council a salary based on the population of the city, and to provide for other forms of compensation, as specified. This bill would require the Controller to determine, based on a review of public records or reported salary information, whether a city is an excess compensation city, as defined. The bill would authorize a city to request a hearing, as specified, to contest the Controller's determination. The bill would require the Controller, if the city does not request a hearing or if the Attorney General concurs with the Controller's determination after a hearing, to notify the city and the redevelopment agency in the city of the city's status as an excess compensation city, as prescribed. (2) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities to address the effects of blight, as defined, in blighted areas in those communities known as project areas, and authorizes the agency to issue bonds. This bill would prohibit the agency, once the agency has received written notice from the Controller that the city is an excess compensation city, from adopting a redevelopment plan for a new project area or amending an existing redevelopment plan for existing project areas; from issuing new bonds, notes, interim certificates, debentures, or other obligations, as specified; and from encumbering any funds or expending any moneys derived from any source except as specified. (3) Existing law, the Ralph M. Brown Act, requires that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend unless a closed session is authorized. The act authorizes a legislative body to hold a closed session with the local agency's designated representatives regarding various issues, including compensation, regarding its represented and unrepresented employees, but the legislative body is prohibited from taking final action on the proposed compensation of one or more unrepresented employees. Existing law also requires that all contracts of employment with a local agency, as defined, for certain positions be ratified in an open session of the governing body and be reflected in the governing body's minutes. This bill would require that any individual contract of employment or amendment to a contract of employment with an employee who is or will be employed by, and report directly to, the legislative body of the local agency be ratified in an open session of the legislative body after prescribed information regarding the contract or amendment to the contract is made available in a conspicuous location on the local agency's Internet Web site, if it maintains one, and in a location that is freely accessible to the public, no later than 5 days prior to the meeting to ratify the contract or amend the contract. By expanding the duties of local officials, these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would also specify that final action on the proposed compensation of one or more unrepresented employees who are to be employed by, and report directly to, the legislative body of the local agency only be taken in open session, consistent with the prescribed disclosure requirements. By expanding the duties of local officials, these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The bill would express a legislative finding and declaration that, to ensure the statewide integrity of local government, disclosure of compensation paid to officers and designated employees is an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal affair and that, therefore, all cities, including charter cities, would be subject to the provisions of the bill. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2555
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Ombudsman programs: appropriation.

Existing law establishes the State Health Facilities Citation Penalties Account into which moneys derived from civil penalties for violations of state law are deposited. Moneys in this account may be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the protection of health or property of residents of long-term health care facilities, as specified. Existing law, the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act, establishes the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in the California Department of Aging. Existing law requires the department to allocate all federal and state funds for local ombudsman programs according to a specified schedule. This bill would appropriate the sum of $1,600,000 from the State Health Facilities Citation Penalties Account to the department to fund local ombudsman programs in accordance with the distribution schedule during the 2010–11 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 2591
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
State finance: budget process.

Under existing law, duties and responsibilities are imposed upon the Governor and the Director of Finance relating to the preparation and submission of the annual state budget to the Legislature, including, among other things, providing a complete plan of all proposed expenditures and estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. Existing provisions of the California Constitution prohibit the Legislature from sending to the Governor for consideration, and prohibit the Governor from signing, a Budget Bill that would appropriate from the General Fund a total amount that, when combined with specific appropriations and transfers, exceeds the General Fund revenues for that fiscal year estimated as of the date of the Budget Bill's passage. This bill would make statutory changes to the state budget process to implement and conform to constitutional changes proposed by ACA 4 and would become operative only if ACA 4 is approved by the voters.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 67
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Public Service Recognition Week.

This measure would designate the week of May 2 to May 8, 2010, as Public Service Recognition Week, and encourage all Californians to recognize the crucial role of public employees in this state.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Showing 201 to 210 of 575 bills
Previous 1 … 20 21 22 … 58 Next