FF
D California Assembly · District 39

Asm. Felipe Fuentes

Compare
Total votes
15,847
all sessions
Attendance
95%
534 missed
Higher than 90% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
524
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
524 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
524
Primary
134
Co-sponsor
390
This page
524
matching current filters
Primary AB 139
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
State claims.

Existing law requires the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board to ensure that all claims that have been approved by the board and for which there exists no legally available appropriation, are submitted for legislative approval at least twice each calendar year. This bill would appropriate $3,009,627.04 from various funds to the Executive Officer of the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board to pay claims accepted by the board. The bill would require the Controller, upon the request of the board, in a form prescribed by the Controller, to transfer surcharges and fees from specified Budget Act items of appropriation identified in the bill to Item 1870-001-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2011. This bill also would appropriate to the board $162,700 to pay a specified claim accepted by the board. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Aug 31, 2011 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 46
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Local government: cities.

Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, sets forth the procedures for incorporations and changes of organizations of cities, including procedures for disincorporation. This bill would provide that every city with a population of less than 150 people as of January 1, 2010, would be disincorporated into that city's respective county as of 91 days after the effective date of the bill, unless a county board of supervisors determines, by majority vote within the 90-day period following enactment of these provisions, that continuing such a city within that county's boundaries would serve a public purpose if the board of supervisors determines that the city is in an isolated rural location that makes it impractical for the residents of the community to organize in another form of local governance. The bill would also require the local agency formation commission within the county to oversee the terms and conditions of the disincorporation of the city, as specified. The bill would become operative only if AB 781 of the 2011–12 Regular Session is enacted.

Failed Aug 29, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1167
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Homelessness: Interagency Council on Homelessness.

Under existing law, several agencies have prescribed responsibilities relating to homeless persons including, among others, administering emergency shelter programs and ensuring the provision of community mental health services for homeless persons. This bill would create the California Interagency Council on Homelessness. This bill would provide that the council be composed of specified members and would require the council to hold public meetings at least once every quarter. This bill would authorize the council to perform various activities, including acting as the lead for coordinating and planning the state's response to homelessness and would require the council to seek all available federal funding for purposes of funding the council and its activities.

Passed Aug 25, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1072
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Community development: California Promise Neighborhoods Initiative.

Existing law provides for various community development programs in the state. Executive Order S-05-10 created the Office of Economic Development in the Governor's office, for the purpose of coordinating economic development activities in the state. This bill would establish the California Promise Neighborhoods Initiative in the Office of Economic Development. It would require the office to establish 40 promise neighborhoods throughout the state, according to specified criteria, to maximize collective efforts within a community to improve the health, safety, education, and economic development of each neighborhood. It would require the office to use existing state resources and federal funds to implement these provisions, and authorize the office to accept financial support from other public or private sources for these purposes. It would require cities, counties, and school districts electing to participate in the initiative to provide the office with specified information. This bill would direct the Office of Economic Development to work with the California Health and Human Services Agency and counties to establish participation goals for specified programs, and it would also direct the office to explore methods for increasing participation rates. The bill would give cities, counties, schools, and school districts located in a promise neighborhood priority consideration for certain programs, grants, and funding.

Passed Aug 25, 2011 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 60
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Korean War Armistice Day.

This measure would proclaim July 27, 2011, as Korean War Veterans Armistice Day. It would urge Californians to remember the Korean War and those who fought against communism. It would also urge Governor Jerry Brown to proclaim July 27, 2011, as Korean War Armistice Day and instruct all state departments, agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals to fly the United States flag at half-mast on July 27, 2011, in memory of the veterans who died as a result of their service in Korea.

Signed into law Aug 23, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 3
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to taxation.

This measure would urge Congress to extend the alternative minimum tax holiday for private activity bonds.

Signed into law Aug 22, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 141
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Jurors: electronic communications.

(1) Existing law requires the court in a jury trial to admonish the jury that it is their duty not to converse with, or permit themselves to be addressed by, any other person on any subject of the trial. The court is required to provide the admonishment in a civil proceeding when the jurors are permitted to separate during the trial, and when the case is submitted to the jury, and, in a criminal proceeding, after the jury has been sworn and before the people's opening address, at each adjournment of the court, and when the jurors are permitted by the court to separate after the case is submitted to the jury. An officer having the jury under his or her charge shall not permit any communication to be made to them, or make any himself or herself, as specified. This bill would expand those admonishments to include the conduct of research or dissemination of information on any subject of the trial. The bill would require the court, when admonishing the jury against conversation, research, or dissemination of information pursuant to these provisions, to clearly explain, as part of the admonishment, that the prohibition applies to all forms of electronic and wireless communication. The bill would require the officer in charge of a jury to prevent any form of electronic or wireless communication. (2) Existing law provides that certain acts or omissions in respect to a court of justice, or proceedings therein, are civil contempts of the authority of the court, including, among other things, disobedience of any lawful judgment, order, or process of the court. Existing law also specifies certain criminal contempts of court, punishable as a misdemeanor, including, among other things, resistance willfully offered by a person to the lawful order or process of a court. This bill would make the willful disobedience by a juror of a court admonishment related to the prohibition on any form of communication or research about the case, including all forms of electronic or wireless communication or research, punishable as either a civil or criminal contempt of court pursuant to those provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Aug 5, 2011 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 140
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Claims against the state: payment.

Current law authorizes a procedure for the state to pay claims against the state. This bill would appropriate funds in prescribed amounts for the payment of certain claims against the state. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Aug 5, 2011 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AJR 10
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to school-based health centers.

This measure would memorialize the Legislature's support for the school-based health center program authorized by the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, an appropriation by the United States Congress to fund this program, policies that include school-based health centers as a partner in creating a medical home for all children, and the inclusion of school-based health centers in the reauthorization of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

Signed into law Jul 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Showing 141 to 150 of 524 bills
Previous 1 … 14 15 16 … 53 Next