SF
D California House · District 36

Rep. Steve Fox

Compare
Total votes
3,943
all sessions
Attendance
94%
205 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
92%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
4%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
278
bills & resolutions
Higher than 87% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
278 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
278
Primary
45
Co-sponsor
233
This page
278
matching current filters
Primary AB 589
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Medical education: underrepresented medical specialties.

Existing law establishes the Student Aid Commission as the primary state agency for the administration of state-authorized student financial aid programs available to students attending all segments of postsecondary education. Existing law establishes various educational loan assumption programs, administered by the commission, under which a qualified person enrolled in an institution of postsecondary education and participating in that loan assumption program is eligible to receive a conditional warrant for loan assumption, to be redeemed upon meeting the conditions of the loan assumption agreement. This bill would enact the Dolores H. Fox Underrepresented Medical Specialties Act, which would establish a loan assumption program for physicians working full time in California practicing in underrepresented specialties, as defined. This program would provide loan assumption benefits to persons who agree to work full time for 4 consecutive years in California as physicians practicing in underrepresented specialties, as specified. The program provides for a progressive assumption of the amount of a qualifying loan over 4 consecutive years of qualifying practice, up to a total loan assumption of $20,000. The bill would require that, in any fiscal year, the commission award no more than the number of warrants that are authorized in the Budget Act for that fiscal year for the assumption of loans pursuant to the program. This program would become inoperative on July 1, 2020, and would be repealed on January 1, 2021.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 550
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
State government: Office of Small Business and Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Services.

Existing law provides for various programs to encourage the participation of small businesses, as certified by the Department of General Services, in state agency contracts, and sets forth the duties of the Office of Small Business and Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Services in this regard. This bill would require the head of a state agency to ensure that a state contracting program is administered in a manner that promotes small business participation. This bill would require the head of a state agency to annually review small business participation levels and to develop a plan for increasing small business participation levels within 60 days when participation levels are low. This bill would require the Department of General Services and the Office of the Small Business Advocate to serve as a resource to assist the heads of state agencies in identifying best practices for utilization of small businesses in their contracting programs. This bill would encourage independent state entities, as specified, to take all necessary actions to comply with the intent and the requirements of this bill. This bill would require a state agency to proactively pursue an annual 25% small business participation level in state contracting and, for an agency that does not achieve this level, to submit to the Governor's office, the Office of the Small Business Advocate, and the Legislature, within 60 days of the close of the calendar year, notice that the small business participation was not achieved and a plan for improving small business contracting. This bill would require the Department of General Services, and authorize the Office of the Small Business Advocate, to provide guidance to state agencies in developing a plan for, and taking the necessary actions toward, achieving the 25% participation level. This bill would not require an action that would result in the violation of a court order or a loss of eligibility for federal funding. This bill would also make findings and declarations regarding small business participation in state contracting.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 677
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Local government finance: property tax revenue allocation: vehicle license fee adjustments.

Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. Beginning with the 2004–05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a vehicle license fee property tax compensation fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions, for the 2013–14 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation. This bill would also modify these reduction and transfer provisions, for the 2013–14 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount for certain cities incorporating after a specified date, as provided. By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 592
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Sentencing: juveniles.

Existing law authorizes the prosecution and punishment of an individual under 18 years of age as an adult for a criminal offense under specified circumstances upon a finding that the individual is not a fit and proper subject to be dealt with under the juvenile court law. Existing statutory language provides that, except as otherwise provided, an individual prosecuted under this provision must be sentenced under the juvenile court law unless the district attorney demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence, that the individual is not a fit and proper subject to be dealt with under the juvenile court law as specified. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 676
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Health care coverage: postdischarge care needs.

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would prohibit health care service plans, health insurers, and the Department of Health Care Services or Medi-Cal managed care plans, as applicable, from causing an enrollee, insured, or beneficiary to remain in a general acute care hospital or an acute psychiatric hospital if the attending physician on the medical staff has determined that the individual no longer requires inpatient hospital care. The bill would require the health care service plan, health insurer, or the State Department of Health Care Services or Medi-Cal managed care plan to perform specified duties within 24 hours of receipt of notice of the discharge. The bill would provide that failure of the respective health care service plan, health insurer, the State Department of Health Care Services, or Medi-Cal managed care plan to perform those duties within 72 hours of the receipt of a notice of discharge would result in a daily penalty amount, as specified, to be paid within 10 days of the patient's discharge. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 305
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Income taxes: hiring credits: investment credits.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws, including a credit in the amount of $3,000 for each full-time employee hired by a qualified employer applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, and ending upon a cut-off date calculated based upon an estimate by the Franchise Tax Board of claims cumulatively totaling $400,000,000 for all taxable years, as specified. Existing law also creates the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee, which has specified duties in regard to low-income housing credits. This bill would instead calculate the cut-off date for the above-described hiring credit based upon an estimate by the Franchise Tax Board of claims cumulatively totaling $200,000,000 for all taxable years, as specified. This bill would also allow a credit under both laws, in modified conformity with a federal New Market Tax Credit, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and before January 1, 2020, in a specified amount for investments in low-income communities. The bill would limit the total annual amount of credit allowed pursuant to these provisions to $40,000,000 and would limit the allocation of the credit to a cumulative total of no more than $200,000,000. This bill would impose specified duties on the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee with regard to the application for, and allocation of, the credit. The bill would require the committee to establish and impose reasonable fees upon entities that apply for the allocation of the credit and use the revenue to defray the cost of administering the program, as specified, thereby making an appropriation. This bill would also appropriate $150,000 from the Tax Credit Allocation Fee Account to the committee for purposes of implementing the tax credit. This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 632
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Superior Courts: judicial districts.

Existing law, except as otherwise provided, makes the superior court in the county where the defendants or some of the defendants reside at the commencement of an action the proper court for the trial of the action. Existing law makes the superior court in the county where an injury occurs or where the defendant or some of the defendants reside the proper court for an action if the action is for injury to person or personal property or death from wrongful act of negligence. This bill would make the judicial district of the superior court in the county where the defendant or some of the defendants reside or where the acts occurred the proper court for purposes of the above actions.

Failed Feb 3, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Showing 131 to 140 of 278 bills
Previous 1 13 14 15 28 Next