Photo of Jay Obernolte
R California Assembly · District 33

Asm. Jay Obernolte

Compare
Total votes
15,100
all sessions
Attendance
94%
662 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
96%
of cast votes
Lower than 87% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 89% of chamber peers
Sponsored
811
bills & resolutions
Lower than 90% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
811 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
811
Primary
150
Co-sponsor
661
This page
811
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 15
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Fitness Week.

This measure would proclaim the week of February 3 to February 9, 2019, as California Fitness Week, and would encourage all Californians to enrich their lives through proper nutrition and exercise.

Signed into law Feb 22, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 26
Introduced · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Legislature: Wounded Warrior Program.

Existing law authorizes certain internship and fellowship programs, as specified. This measure would honor the achievements of the United States House of Representatives' Wounded Warrior Program and would encourage the Assembly Committee on Rules to study the potential of implementing similar programs in the Legislature.

Introduced Feb 12, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 905
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Alcoholic beverages: hours of sale.

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2021, and before January 2, 2026, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city which would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 4 a.m., upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hours without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to Cathedral City, Coachella, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Palm Springs, Sacramento, San Francisco, and West Hollywood. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.

Vetoed Sep 28, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2294
Vetoed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Child custody proceedings: finding of sexual abuse.

Existing law authorizes a court to request the local child welfare services agency to conduct an investigation of allegations of child abuse, including child sexual abuse, made during a child custody proceeding. Existing law requires a social worker to investigate these court-referred allegations of child abuse to the same extent as any other child abuse allegations, including interviewing a child 4 years of age or older under specific circumstances. Existing law requires the local child welfare services agency, upon completion of the investigation, to report its findings to the court. This bill would require a court to request the local child welfare services agency to conduct an investigation of allegations of child abuse, including child sexual abuse, made during a child custody proceeding, when the court determines that it cannot protect the child from future child abuse, either through custody or protective orders. This bill would require the local welfare agency, upon completion of the investigation, to report its findings to the court. By requiring a local child welfare services agency to conduct an investigation under these additional circumstances, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Vetoed Sep 27, 2018 0 co-sponsors
Showing 171 to 180 of 811 bills
Previous 1 … 17 18 19 … 82 Next