Photo of Robert Rivas
D California Assembly · District 29 On the 2026 ballot

Asm. Robert Rivas

Compare
Total votes
20,740
all sessions
Attendance
99%
146 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
1,617
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
1
assignment
1,617 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,617
Primary
107
Co-sponsor
1,510
This page
1,617
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AB 793
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Privacy: reverse demands.

The United States Constitution generally requires a state to give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. Existing law sets forth procedures by which a person may enforce a judgment for the payment of money issued by the court of a state other than California. Existing law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, determines how governmental entities may access information on electronic devices and from electronic communication service providers, as defined. Existing law requires a California corporation that provides electronic communication services or remote computing services to the general public to comply with a warrant issued by another state to produce records that would reveal the identity of the customers using those services, data stored by, or on behalf of, the customer, the customer's usage of those services, the recipient or destination of communications sent to or from those customers, or the content of those communications as if that warrant had been issued by a California court, except as specified. This bill would prohibit any government entity from seeking, or any court from enforcing, assisting, or supporting, a reverse-keyword or reverse-location demand, as defined, issued by a government entity or court in this state or any other state. The bill would prohibit a person or California entity from complying with a reverse-keyword or reverse-location demand. The bill would require a court to suppress any information obtained or retained in violation of these provisions, the United States Constitution, or California Constitution. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to commence a civil action for compliance with these provisions. The bill would require a government entity to immediately notify any person whose information was obtained in violation of these provisions of the violation and of the legal recourse available, as specified. The bill would authorize an individual whose information was obtained, or a service provider or other recipient of the reverse-keyword or reverse-location demand to file a petition to void or modify the demand or order the destruction of information obtained in violation of these provisions. The bill would authorize an individual whose information was obtained by a government entity in violation of these provisions to bring a civil suit against the government entity for damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, or other relief that the court deems proper. The California Constitution provides for the Right to Truth-in-Evidence, which requires a 23 vote of the Legislature to exclude any relevant evidence from any criminal proceeding, as specified. Because the bill would require any information obtained or retained in violation of the bill's provisions to be suppressed in a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, it would require a 23 vote. The bill would make these provisions severable.

Passed Jun 30, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 50
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Nonprofits Day.

This measure would declare June 7, 2023, as California Nonprofits Day in recognition of the importance of nonprofit organizations to the economy and well-being of this state.

Signed into law Jun 29, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCA 7
In committee · California Senate · Co-sponsor
A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 1.5 to Article XIV thereof, relating to employment.

Existing state law forbids a public employer from deterring or discouraging public employees from becoming or remaining members of an employee organization. Existing federal law forbids employers from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of rights relating to organizing, forming, joining, or assisting a labor organization for collective bargaining purposes, or from working together to improve terms and conditions of employment, or refraining from any such activity. This measure, the Right to Organize and Negotiate Act, would ensure that all Californians have the right to join a union and to negotiate with their employers, through their legally chosen representative, to protect their economic well-being and safety at work. This measure would require the Legislature to provide for the enforcement of these rights. This measure would also prohibit, after January 1, 2023, the passing of any statute or ordinance that interferes with, negates, or diminishes the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively over their wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment and workplace safety.

In committee Jun 26, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Showing 621 to 630 of 1,617 bills
Previous 1 … 62 63 64 … 162 Next