Photo of Evan Low
D California Assembly · District 26 · Former member

Asm. Evan Low

Contact Email
Compare
Total votes
21,773
all sessions
Attendance
96%
821 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
2,048
bills & resolutions
Higher than 79% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
2,048 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,048
Primary
290
Co-sponsor
1,758
This page
2,048
matching current filters
Primary AB 1998
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Dental Practice Act: unprofessional conduct.

Existing law, the Dental Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of dentists and dental assistants by the Dental Board of California. The act specifies unprofessional conduct by a licensee to include, among other things, the failure by a treating dentist, prior to the initial diagnosis and correction of malpositions of human teeth or the initial use of orthodontic appliances, to perform an examination pursuant to that required of a patient of record, including the review of the patient's most recent diagnostic digital or conventional radiographs or other equivalent bone imaging suitable for orthodontia. The act requires new radiographs or other equivalent bone imaging to be ordered if deemed appropriate by the treating dentist. The act defines a patient of record to mean a patient who has been examined, has had a medical and dental history completed and evaluated, and has had oral conditions diagnosed and a written plan developed by the licensed dentist. The act also specifies unprofessional conduct by a licensee to include the advertising of either professional superiority or the advertising of performance of professional services in a superior manner. This bill would revise that unprofessional conduct provision described above to require new radiographs or other equivalent bone imaging to be ordered if no radiographs are available for diagnostic review. The bill would provide that, for purposes of that unprofessional conduct provision, the correction of malpositions includes any movement of the teeth, including the treatment of malocclusions. The bill would also specify unprofessional conduct by a licensee to include the destruction of patient records before 10 years have elapsed from the date a dental service was last provided if the patient is an adult or 7 years have elapsed from the date a dental service was last provided, or one year has elapsed from the patient's 18th birthday, whichever is longer, if the patient is a minor. The bill would additionally specify unprofessional conduct by a licensee to include the advertising of performance of professional services in a more expeditious manner. Existing law requires an individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity providing dental services through telehealth, prior to the rendering of services and when requested by a patient, to make available the name, telephone number, practice address, and California state license number of any dentist who will be involved in the provision of services to a patient, and makes a violation of that provision unprofessional conduct. This bill would require the information described above to be provided to the patient at the time that the patient receives the recommended treatment plan for services involving the diagnosis and correction of malpositions of human teeth or initial use of orthodontic appliances, as specified. Existing law prohibits a provider of dental services from requiring a patient to sign an agreement limiting the patient's ability to file a complaint with the board. This bill would prohibit a licensed dentist, dental assistant, registered dental assistant, registered dental assistant in extended functions, dental sedation assistant permitholder, orthodontic assistant permitholder, registered dental hygienist, registered dental hygienist in alternative practice, registered dental hygienist in extended functions, or other person from being required to sign an agreement that limits the signatory's ability to file a complaint or provide information to the board. Existing law requires a licensee who fails or refuses to comply with a request for the dental records of a patient, that is accompanied by that patient's written authorization for release of record to the board, within 15 days of receiving the request and authorization, to pay to the board a civil penalty of $250 per day for each day that the documents have not been produced after the 15th day, up to a maximum of $5,000, unless the licensee is unable to provide the documents within this time period for good cause. This bill would specify unprofessional conduct by a licensed dentist to include failure to comply with a written request of a patient to receive a copy of any patient-signed documents within 15 days of receiving the request.

Failed Aug 8, 2020 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 1384
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Local educational agencies: liability for COVID-19-related injuries.

Existing law establishes a system of public elementary and secondary schools in the state, and authorizes local educational agencies throughout the state to operate schools and provide instruction to pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive. Existing law provides that no monetary liability and no cause of action arises against specified entities for certain conduct, including, except for specified damages, for a hospital for any action taken upon the recommendation of its medical staff, or against any other person or organization for any action taken, or restriction imposed, which is required to be reported, if that action or restriction is reported, as specified. This bill would require, during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined, the governing board of a local educational agency, as defined, or its designee, to establish health and safety policies and procedures for operating programs and facilities in a manner consistent with applicable federal, state, and local requirements and COVID-19-related guidelines published by the State Department of Public Health. The bill would require the governing boards of local educational agencies, or their designees, to ensure that reasonable efforts are undertaken to implement those policies and procedures. The bill would exempt a local educational agency, and its officers or employees, that meet these requirements from monetary liability and damages for injury relating to COVID-19 infection, transmission, or specified policies and procedures established pursuant to the bill, any condition in existence because of the COVID-19 pandemic, or any act or omission by the local educational agency, its officers, or its employees in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as provided, with specified exceptions. By imposing new duties on local educational agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Passed Jul 29, 2020 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 31
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Sales and use taxes: exemption: menstrual hygiene products.

Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. Those laws provide various exemptions from those taxes, including, until July 1, 2023, an exemption for the sale of, or the storage, use, or other consumption of, menstrual hygiene products, defined as tampons, specified sanitary napkins, menstrual sponges, and menstrual cups. Existing law requires the Department of Finance, beginning on May 15, 2020, to estimate the total dollar amount of revenue that would have been credited to the Local Revenue Fund 2011 if not otherwise exempted under the sales and use tax exemption for menstrual hygiene products and requires the Controller to transfer that amount from the General Fund to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, a continuously appropriated fund, no later than June 30 of each fiscal year. This bill would establish a similar exemption for the sale of, or the storage, use, or other consumption of, menstrual hygiene products beginning July 1, 2023, and would define menstrual hygiene products to additionally include menstrual underwear. The bill would provide that the Department of Finance is required to calculate, and the Controller is required to transfer, the total dollar amount of revenue prior to January 1, 2024, that would have been credited to the Local Revenue Fund 2011 if not otherwise exempted under the sales and use tax with respect to menstrual hygiene products, as specified. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Passed Jul 23, 2020 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2999
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Employees: bereavement leave.

Existing law provides employees with the right to take time off work without discharge or discrimination for a variety of reasons, including taking time off to appear in school on behalf of a child or to assist a family member who is the victim of domestic abuse or sexual assault. This bill would enact the Bereavement Leave Act of 2020. The bill would require an employer with 25 or more employees to grant an employee up to 10 business days of unpaid bereavement leave upon the death of a spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, or domestic partner, in accordance with certain procedures, and subject to certain exclusions. The bill would require an employer with fewer than 25 employees to grant 3 business days of leave, in accordance with these provisions. The bill would prohibit an employer from interfering with or restraining the exercise or attempt to exercise the employee's right to take this leave. This bill would authorize an employee who has been discharged, disciplined, or discriminated against for exercising their right to bereavement leave to file a complaint with the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement or bring a civil action against their employer for reinstatement, specified damages, and attorney's fees. The provisions of the bill would not apply to an employee who is covered by a valid collective bargaining agreement that provides for bereavement leave and other specified working conditions. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Passed Jul 14, 2020 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1616
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Department of Consumer Affairs: boards: expunged convictions.

Existing law establishes the Department of Consumer Affairs, which is composed of various boards, and authorizes a board to suspend or revoke a license on the ground that the licensee has been convicted of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the business or profession for which the license was issued. Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of medicine by the Medical Board of California and requires the board to post certain historical information on current and former licensees, including felony and certain misdemeanor convictions. Existing law also requires the Medical Board of California, upon receipt of a certified copy of an expungement order from a current or former licensee, to post notification of the expungement order and the date thereof on its internet website. This bill would require a board within the department that has posted on its internet website that a person's license was revoked because the person was convicted of a crime, within 90 days of receiving an expungement order for the underlying offense from the person, if the person reapplies for licensure or is relicensed, to post notification of the expungement order and the date thereof on the board's internet website. The bill would require the board, on receiving an expungement order, if the person is not currently licensed and does not reapply for licensure, to remove within the same period the initial posting on its internet website that the person's license was revoked and information previously posted regarding arrests, charges, and convictions. The bill would require a person in either case to pay a $50 fee to the board, unless another amount is determined by the board to be necessary to cover the cost of administering the bill's provisions.

Passed Jul 7, 2020 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 2690
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Mobilehome parks: local ordinances.

Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, prescribes various terms and conditions of tenancies in mobilehome parks. Existing law exempts new construction, defined as spaces initially held out for rent after January 1, 1990, from any ordinance, rule, regulation, or initiative measure adopted by a city or county, which establishes a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent. This bill would repeal the exemption regarding new construction from ordinances, rules, regulations, and initiative measures, establishing a maximum amount that a landlord may charge a tenant for rent.

Passed Jul 1, 2020 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACA 4
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 2 of Article II thereof, relating to elections.

The California Constitution authorizes any person who is a United States citizen, at least 18 years of age, and a resident of the state to vote. This measure, in addition, would authorize a United States citizen who is 17 years of age, is a resident of the state, and will be at least 18 years of age at the time of the next general election to vote in any primary or special election that occurs before the next general election in which the citizen would be eligible to vote if at least 18 years of age.

Signed into law Jul 1, 2020 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACA 11
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 to Article XIIIA thereof, relating to tax limitation.

The California Constitution limits the amount of ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property, defined as the county assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975–76 tax bill and, thereafter, the appraised value of the property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership occurs after the 1975 assessment, subject to an annual inflation adjustment not to exceed 2%. The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to authorize a person over 55 years of age or any severely and permanently disabled person residing in property eligible for the homeowner's exemption to transfer the base year value of that property to a replacement dwelling of equal or lesser value located in the same county, or another county that has adopted an ordinance allowing base years value transfers from other counties, as provided. The California Constitution also provides that the purchase or transfer of the principal residence, and the first $1,000,000 of other real property, of a transferor in the case of a transfer between parents and their children, or between grandparents and their grandchildren if all the parents of those grandchildren are deceased, is not a "purchase" or "change in ownership" for purposes of determining the "full cash value" of property for taxation. This measure, beginning on and after April 1, 2021, would authorize an owner of a primary residence who is over 55 years of age, severely disabled, or a victim of a wildfire or natural disaster, as defined, to transfer the taxable value, defined as the base year value plus inflation adjustments, of their primary residence to a replacement primary residence located anywhere in the state, regardless of the location or value of the replacement primary residence, that is purchased or newly constructed as that person's principal residence within 2 years of the sale of the original primary residence. The measure would limit a person who is over 55 years of age or severely disabled to 3 transfers under these provisions. The measure, beginning on and after February 16, 2021, would exclude from the terms "purchase" and "change in ownership" for purposes of determining the "full cash value" of property the purchase or transfer of a family home or family farm, as those terms are defined, of the transferor in the case of a transfer between parents and their children, or between grandparents and their grandchildren if all the parents of those grandchildren are deceased. In the case of a transfer of a family home, the measure would require that the property continue as the family home of the transferee. The measure would require that the taxable value of the property be determined as provided. In the case of property tax benefits provided to a family home under these provisions, the bill would require the transferee to claim the homeowner's or disabled veteran's exemption within one year of the transfer. The measure would specify that the above-described provisions relating to transfers between parents or grandparents and children or grandchildren would apply to transfers occurring on or before February 15, 2021. The measure would establish the California Fire Response Fund in the State Treasury. The measure would require the Controller to annually transfer a specified amount, based on calculations by the Director of Finance, of the additional revenues and savings that accrued to the state from the implementation of this measure's provisions from the General Fund to that fund. However, the measure would provide that, if the amount required to be transferred to the California Fire Response Fund exceeds the amount transferred for the previous fiscal year by more than 10%, that excess amount would not be transferred to the California Fire Response Fund. The measure would require the Legislature to appropriate moneys in the fund solely for the purpose of funding fire suppression staffing by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and underfunded special districts that provide fire protection services, as provided. The measure would also establish the County Revenue Protection Fund and continuously appropriate moneys in that fund for the purpose of reimbursing eligible local agencies, as provided. The measure would require the Controller to annually transfer a specified amount, based on the above-described calculations by the Director of Finance, from the General Fund to that fund. The measure would require each county to annually determine the gain of the county and any local agency within the county resulting from the implementation of this measure and, if that amount of gain is negative, provide that specified eligible local agencies may receive a reimbursement from the County Revenue Protection Fund. The measure would require the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to provide a reimbursement to each eligible local agency that has a negative gain, determined every 3 years based on the aggregate gain of the eligible local agency, as provided, and require the Controller to transfer any remaining balance in the County Revenue Protection Fund to the General Fund at the end of each 3-year period, to be available for appropriation for any purpose.

Signed into law Jul 1, 2020 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 613
Passed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Dentists: clinical laboratories: license examinations.

(1) Existing law provides for the licensure, registration, and regulation of clinical laboratories and various clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law requires a clinical laboratory test or examination classified as waived under the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) to be performed under the overall operation and administration of a laboratory director, which is defined to include certain licensees. This bill would expand the definition of "laboratory director" to include licensed dentists. (2) Existing law, the Dental Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of dentistry by the Dental Board of California in the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires an applicant for licensure to have taken and received a passing score on either a clinical and written examination administered by the Western Regional Examining Board or a clinical and written examination developed by the American Board of Dental Examiners, Inc., subject to the Department of Consumer Affairs making a determination that the examination is compliant with specified requirements and standards. Existing law authorizes the acceptance of an American Board of Dental Examiners, Inc. examination only after the department makes that determination. This bill would delete the provision specifying that the examination may only be accepted after that determination is made. The bill, until January 1, 2024, would specify that an applicant who received a passing score on either of the examinations specified above between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, inclusive, shall be deemed to satisfy the examination requirement. The bill would make conforming changes.

Passed Jun 29, 2020 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1,021 to 1,030 of 2,048 bills