JC
D California House · District 23

Rep. Joe Coto

Compare
Total votes
10,489
all sessions
Attendance
99%
61 missed
Higher than 86% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Higher than 75% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 78% of chamber peers
Sponsored
443
bills & resolutions
Lower than 89% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
443 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
443
Primary
79
Co-sponsor
364
This page
443
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 118
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to Spay Day USA 2010.

This measure would declare February 23, 2010, to be Spay Day USA 2010 in California, and would request that Californians observe that day by having their dogs and cats spayed or neutered and by providing voluntary services or other support to organizations that provide spay and neuter services.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 24
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to marine air pollution.

This resolution would respectfully request that the International Maritime Organization, a specialized agency of the United Nations, adopt the North American Emission Control Area, as proposed by the United States, Canada, and France at the 60th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee, scheduled for March 2010.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 113
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Arizona law.

This measure would urge various state and private entities to withhold financial support of Arizona businesses in response to recent Arizona state laws relating to illegal immigration.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1606
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Medi-Cal: department-approved chronic disease self-management programs.

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which basic health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law requires the department to submit an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a waiver or demonstration project that would implement specified objectives. Existing law requires the waiver or demonstration project to include designated restructuring proposals for the organization and delivery of services under the Medi-Cal program. Existing law provides that the restructuring proposals may include, but are not limited to, better care coordination for, among other persons, seniors and persons with disabilities, and requires better care coordination to include the establishment of organized delivery systems that incorporate a medical home system of care and disease management. This bill would require the department to include reimbursement under the Medi-Cal program for services provided through a department-approved chronic disease self-management program, as defined, as part of the above-described restructuring proposals. The bill would provide that if the department includes better care coordination as part of the above-described restructuring proposals, reimbursement for services provided through a department-approved chronic disease self-management program be implemented as part of the department's implementation of better care coordination.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 2197
Failed · California House · Lead sponsor
Problem and pathological gambling.

Existing law establishes the Office of Problem and Pathological Gambling within the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, and sets forth its duties relating to prevention and control of problem and pathological gambling, as defined. This bill would require the prevention program developed by the office to include development of education and awareness programs that specifically target geographically diverse multicultural populations, and would permit the office to develop a grant program for education, outreach, and prevention, giving preferences to grant applications that meet prescribed conditions.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 663
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Legal aid: court interpreters: appearances by telephone.

(1) Existing law, the State Bar Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation. Existing law provides that it is the duty of an attorney to, among other things, never reject, for any consideration personal to himself or herself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed. Existing law provides that a lawyer may fulfill his or her ethical commitment to provide pro bono services, in part, by providing financial support to organizations providing free legal services to persons of limited means. This bill would prohibit a person or organization that is not a specified type of legal aid organization, as defined, from using the term "legal aid," or any confusingly similar name in any firm name, trade name, fictitious business name, or other designation, or on any advertisement, letterhead, business card, or sign. The bill would subject a person or organization that violates this prohibition to specified civil liability. (2) Existing law provides that, in all general civil cases, as defined, a party who has provided notice may appear by telephone at certain conferences, hearings, and proceedings, except as specified. This bill would require the Judicial Council, on or before July 1, 2010, and periodically as appropriate, to enter into one or more master agreements with a vendor or vendors to provide for telephone appearances in civil cases under the provisions described above, or as otherwise permitted by law. The bill would impose requirements regarding those master agreements, including that the vendor charge a party for an appearance by telephone in an amount set by the Judicial Council, and that the vendor pay to the state $15 for each appearance by telephone and a proportionate share of an amount equal to the total revenue received from vendors by all courts for providing telephone appearances for the 2008–09 fiscal year. The bill would require those funds to be deposited in the Trial Court Trust Fund and used for specified purposes. (3) Existing law requires that, when a witness is incapable of understanding the English language or is incapable of expressing himself or herself in the English language so as to be understood directly by counsel, court, and jury, an interpreter be sworn to interpret for him or her. This bill would require the Judicial Council, by September 1, 2010, to establish a working group to review, identify, and develop best practices to provide interpreters in civil actions and proceedings, as specified. The bill would require the Judicial Council to select up to 5 courts to participate in a pilot project, to commence on July 1, 2011, to provide interpreters in civil proceedings. The bill would provide that the initial pilot courts shall participate until June 30, 2014, and would require the Judicial Council to consider whether a pilot court shall continue participating in the project and whether to select another court or additional courts. The pilot project would be funded from the revenue derived from the telephonic appearance fee described above. (4) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to conduct a study of language and interpreter use and need in court proceedings, with commentary, and to report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and to the Legislature every 5 years. Existing law requires that this study serve as the basis for determining the need to establish interpreter programs and certification and establishing these programs and examinations through the normal budgetary process. This bill would require, in addition, as of January 1, 2011, that the study described above serve as the basis of determining the need for and use of interpreters in civil and criminal court proceedings. The bill would require trial courts to collect and report the use of interpreters in all criminal and civil proceedings in the manner specified by the Judicial Council.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1565
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Research and development tax credit areas.

Existing law establishes the Department of Housing and Community Development with duties that include overseeing various programs to promote economic and community development throughout the state. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2016, the department to designate, based on specific factors, a Research and Development Tax Credit Area located within an Innovation Hub or a city, as respectively defined. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, by reference to a specified federal statute, allow a credit against taxes imposed by those laws for increasing research activities. The amount of the credit under both laws is equal to 15% of the excess of the qualified research expenses, as defined, for the taxable year over the base amount, as defined, and, in addition, under the Corporation Tax Law, 24% of the basic research payments, as defined. This bill would, under both laws, in lieu of that credit, for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2011, and before January 1, 2016, provide to a qualified taxpayer, as defined, a tax credit for research and development, as defined, for expenses equal to 20% of the research and development expenses relating to the development of alternative energy sources and advanced transportation technologies, as those terms are defined, conducted in California in a research and development tax area, as described. The bill would further require the Legislative Analyst's Office to report to the Legislature on the effectiveness of the tax credit program established by this act. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 114
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to a Day of Remembrance.

This measure would declare February 19, 2010, as a Day of Remembrance in order to increase public awareness of the events surrounding the internment of Americans of Japanese ancestry during World War II.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 4
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

This measure would memorialize the President and the Congress of the United States to enact the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which would make supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and state and local fiscal stabilization.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 108
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to Black History Month.

This measure would recognize February 2010 as Black History Month, urge all citizens to join in celebrating the accomplishments of African Americans during Black History Month, and encourage the people of California to recognize the many talents, achievements, and contributions that African Americans make to their communities.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Showing 41 to 50 of 443 bills
Previous 1 4 5 6 45 Next