Photo of Bill Quirk
D California Assembly · District 20

Asm. Bill Quirk

Compare
Total votes
29,630
all sessions
Attendance
95%
912 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
1,699
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
1,699 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,699
Primary
228
Co-sponsor
1,471
This page
1,699
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AB 322
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Energy: Electric Program Investment Charge program: biomass.

The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) , with jurisdiction over all public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing decisions of the PUC institute an Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to fund renewable energy and research, development, and demonstration programs. Existing law creates in the State Treasury the Electric Program Investment Charge Fund to be administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and requires the PUC to forward to the Energy Commission, at least quarterly, moneys for those EPIC programs the PUC has determined should be administered by the Energy Commission for deposit in the fund. Existing law requires the Energy Commission, in administering moneys in the fund for research, development, and demonstration programs, to develop and implement the EPIC program for the purpose of awarding funds to projects that may lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the state's statutory energy goals and that may result in a portfolio of projects that are strategically focused and sufficiently narrow to make advancement on the most significant technological challenges. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, requires the Energy Commission to expend certain percentages of the moneys appropriated from the fund for technology demonstration and deployment at sites that benefit certain communities. This bill would require the Energy Commission to consider, in the investment planning process for the EPIC program, funding for eligible biomass conversion to energy projects, as specified. The bill would require the commission, in determining the appropriate amount of EPIC funding for biomass conversion, to consider the recommendations of the State Air Resources Board and the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and to coordinate with the Natural Resources Agency, the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, and the Department of Food and Agriculture about the need for biomass conversion. The bill would also require the Energy Commission to consider opportunities to reduce short-lived climate pollutant emissions, generate carbon negative emissions, reduce wildfire impacts, and increase energy reliability.

Signed into law Sep 23, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 959
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Park districts: ordinances: nuisances: abatement.

Existing law prescribes procedures, including the election of a board of directors, for the formation of regional park districts, regional park and open-space districts, or regional open-space districts. Existing law authorizes 3 or more cities, together with any parcel or parcels of city or county territory, whether in the same or different counties, to organize and incorporate, but requires that all the territory in the proposed district be contiguous. Existing law requires the board of directors to superintend, control, and make available to all the inhabitants of the district all public recreation lands and facilities, as provided. Existing law requires the board of directors to act only by ordinance, resolution, or a motion duly recorded in the minutes of a meeting of the board. This bill would authorize the board of directors of a district, by ordinance, to declare that an encroachment onto district lands constitutes a nuisance. The bill would authorize a district that adopts such a nuisance ordinance to establish a nuisance abatement procedure, which would include notice and hearing requirements, and to collect abatement and related administrative costs and penalties, including through a nuisance abatement lien, as specified. The bill would authorize a county recorder to impose a fee on a district to reimburse the costs of processing and recording a nuisance abatement lien and providing notice. The bill would additionally authorize a district to initiate a civil action to abate a nuisance in the name of the district, as specified. Existing law provides that a violation of an ordinance, rule, or regulation adopted by the board of directors of a district is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine or imprisonment in the county jail, as provided. This bill would provide that the above provision does not apply to a violation of an ordinance adopted pursuant to the bill's provisions.

Signed into law Sep 23, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 525
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Energy: offshore wind generation.

The 100 Percent Clean Energy Act of 2018 established as a policy of the state that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100% of electricity procured to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045. The act requires the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) , State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , and State Air Resources Board to, as part of a public process, issue a joint report to the Legislature by January 1, 2021, and every 4 years thereafter, that includes specified information relating to the implementation of the policy. Existing law requires the PUC and the Energy Commission to undertake various actions in furtherance of meeting the state's clean energy and pollution reduction objectives. This bill would require the Energy Commission, on or before June 1, 2022, to evaluate and quantify the maximum feasible capacity of offshore wind to achieve reliability, ratepayer, employment, and decarbonization benefits and to establish offshore wind planning goals for 2030 and 2045, as specified. The bill would require the Energy Commission, in coordination with specified agencies, to develop a strategic plan for offshore wind energy developments installed off the California coast in federal waters, as specified. The bill would require the Energy Commission to submit the strategic plan to the Natural Resources Agency and the Legislature on or before June 30, 2023. The bill would require the Energy Commission, in coordination with specified agencies, to work with stakeholders, state, local, and federal agencies, and the offshore wind energy industry to identify suitable sea space for wind energy areas in federal waters sufficient to accommodate the offshore wind planning goals for 2030 and 2045. The bill would require the Energy Commission, in coordination with relevant state and local agencies, to develop a plan to improve waterfront facilities that could support a range of floating offshore wind energy development activities. The bill would require the Energy Commission, in consultation with the PUC and Independent System Operator, to assess the transmission investments and upgrades necessary to support the offshore wind planning goals for 2030 and 2045, as specified. The bill would require the Energy Commission to develop and produce a permitting roadmap that describes timeframes and milestones for a permitting process for offshore wind energy facilities and associated electricity and transmission infrastructure off the coast of California. The bill would require the information described in this paragraph and potential impacts on coastal resources, fisheries, Native American and Indigenous peoples, and national defense, and strategies for addressing those potential impacts, to be included in the strategic plan, as specified. The bill would require the Energy Commission, on or before December 31, 2022, to submit to the Natural Resources Agency and the relevant fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature a preliminary assessment of the economic benefits of offshore wind as they relate to seaport investments and workforce development needs and standards. The bill would repeal all of these provisions on January 1, 2027.

Signed into law Sep 23, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 287
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Civil actions: statute of limitations.

The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act, an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under the act to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities. MAUCRSA generally divides responsibility for the state licensure and regulation of commercial cannabis activity among the Department of Food and Agriculture, the State Department of Public Health, and the Bureau of Cannabis Control, which MAUCRSA establishes within the Department of Consumer Affairs. MAUCRSA imposes a civil penalty on a person engaging in commercial cannabis activity without a license required by MAUCRSA of up to 3 times the amount of the license fee for each violation. MAUCRSA does not supersede or limit state agencies from exercising their existing enforcement authority. MAUCRSA authorizes a local jurisdiction to enforce its provisions and the regulations promulgated by a licensing authority if delegated the power to do so by the licensing authority, as specified. Existing law generally requires an action upon a statute for a penalty or forfeiture to commence within one year. This bill would require a civil action for a penalty described above to commence within 3 years. The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act, an initiative measure, authorizes the Legislature to amend the act to further the purposes and intent of the act with a23 vote of the membership of both houses of the Legislature, except as provided. This bill would declare that its provisions further the purposes and intent of the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act.

Signed into law Sep 23, 2021 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 784
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District.

(1) The Transit District Law authorizes any city together with unincorporated territory, or 2 or more cities, with or without unincorporated territory, in either the Counties of Alameda or Contra Costa or both, to organize and incorporate as a transit district divided into 5 wards with specified powers and duties relative to providing public transit service. This bill would repeal the authority to form a transit district under these provisions and would recognize the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District as the district formed pursuant to this authority. (2) Existing law requires a local agency to comply with all applicable building ordinances and zoning ordinances of the county or city in which the territory of the local agency is situated and, for purposes of this provision, excludes rapid transit districts from the definition of a local agency. This bill would designate the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District as a rapid transit district, thereby excluding the district from the definition of a local agency for purposes of that provision. (3) Existing law vests the government of a transit district formed under the Transit District Law in the board of 7 directors, one from each ward and 2 at large. Existing law requires elections for the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District to be conducted in accordance with the Uniform District Election Law and requires any costs incurred by county officials to be paid by the transit district. Existing law requires the nomination paper for directors elected by wards to be signed by 50 voters of the respective ward, and requires the nomination paper for directors elected at large to be signed by 50 voters of the district. The bill would increase the number of signatures required for nomination papers for directors elected at large to 100 voters of the district. In lieu of signatures, the bill would authorize a nomination paper for directors elected by ward or at large to include a filing fee in the amount of $150. This bill would require the nomination papers to be filed with, and the in-lieu fees to be paid to, the county elections official in the county or counties in which the candidate is running. To the extent that the bill imposes additional duties on a county elections official in processing the nomination papers and in-lieu filing fees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law authorizes the board of directors of a transit district formed under the Transit District Law to establish a retirement system for the officers and employees of the district, as specified, and prohibits the retirement system from applying to elective officers. Existing law authorizes the board to prescribe the terms and conditions upon which the officers and employees of the district or their beneficiaries are entitled to benefits and the amounts of those benefits. If a former employee of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District is elected to the board, this bill would prohibit a retirement system from applying to their service on the board. (5) This bill would make other related changes including various changes to the organization and administration of the district and to the duties of the appointive officers of the district. (6) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Sep 22, 2021 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 239
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Winegrowers and brandy manufacturers: exercise of privileges: locations.

Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, which is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the application, issuance, and suspension of alcoholic beverage licenses. Existing law authorizes licensed winegrowers and brandy manufacturers to exercise their license privileges away from their licensed premises at, or from, branch offices or warehouses or United States bonded wine cellars located away from the place of production or manufacture, subject to specified exceptions. One of the exceptions to this authorization is the sale or delivery of wine to consumers in containers supplied, furnished, or sold by the consumer. This bill would delete the exception to the authorization applicable to winemakers, as described above, and would thus allow them to sell and deliver wine to consumers in containers supplied, furnished, or sold by the consumer away from their licensed premises.

Signed into law Sep 22, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 58
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to One Health Day.

This measure would proclaim November 3, 2021, as One Health Day, to celebrate and bring attention to the need for a One Health approach to address shared health threats at the human-animal-environmental interface.

Signed into law Sep 17, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 56
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to blood cancer and blood donation awareness.

This measure would designate the month of September 2021 as Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Myeloma Awareness Month and Blood Cancer Awareness Month and the first week of September 2021 as Blood Donation Week.

Signed into law Sep 17, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 64
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Harvey L. Hall Memorial Highway.

This measure would designate a specified portion of Westside Parkway on State Route 58 in the County of Kern as the Harvey L. Hall Memorial Highway. The measure would request that the Department of Transportation determine the costs of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering those costs, erect those signs.

Signed into law Sep 17, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Showing 301 to 310 of 1,699 bills
Previous 1 … 30 31 32 … 170 Next