Photo of Catharine B. Baker
R California Assembly · District 16

Asm. Catharine B. Baker

Compare
Total votes
8,843
all sessions
Attendance
100%
37 missed
Higher than 95% of chamber peers
With party
92%
of cast votes
Lower than 99% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
4%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 97% of chamber peers
Sponsored
1,006
bills & resolutions
Higher than 89% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
1,006 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,006
Primary
76
Co-sponsor
930
This page
1,006
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACA 21
In committee · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 25 to Article XVI thereof, relating to state infrastructure.

Existing provisions of the California Constitution establish the Budget Stabilization Account in the General Fund and require the Controller, on or before October 1 of the 2015–16 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to transfer from the General Fund to the Budget Stabilization Account amounts that include a sum equal to 1.5% of the estimated amount of General Fund revenues for that fiscal year. This measure would amend the California Constitution to create the California Infrastructure Investment Fund in the State Treasury. The measure would require the Controller, beginning in the 2019–20 fiscal year, to transfer from the General Fund to the California Infrastructure Investment Fund in each fiscal year an amount equal to up to 2.5% of the estimated General Fund revenues for that fiscal year, as provided. The measure would require, for the 2019–20 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the amounts in the fund to be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for specified infrastructure investments, including the funding of deferred maintenance projects.

In committee May 1, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 2462
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Bail: domestic violence.

Existing law requires a judge or magistrate, in setting, reducing, or denying bail, to take into consideration the protection of the public, the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of his or her appearing at trial or at a hearing of the case. Existing law requires that public safety be the primary consideration. In considering the seriousness of the offense charged, existing law requires a judge or magistrate to include consideration of, among other things, the alleged injury to the victim and the alleged use of a firearm or other deadly weapon in the commission of the crime charged. This bill, for purposes of a defendant charged with domestic violence, as defined, would require a judge or magistrate to take into consideration whether the victim was allegedly strangled or suffocated, as defined, by the defendant.

Failed Apr 26, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1149
died · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Public employees' retirement: defined contribution program.

The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) , which provides a defined benefit to members of the system, based on final compensation, credited service, and age at retirement, subject to certain variations. PERL vests management and control of PERS in the Board of Administration. Under PERL, membership in PERS is compulsory for specified public employees and optional for other public employees. The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) generally requires a public retirement system, as defined, to modify its plan or plans to comply with the act. PEPRA authorizes a public employer to provide a contribution to a defined contribution plan for compensation in excess of certain federal compensation limits applicable to qualified pension trusts, if the plan and contribution meet the requirements set forth in federal law. PEPRA prohibits any of those employer contributions to an employee defined contribution plan from exceeding the employer's contribution rate, as a percentage of pay, required to fund the defined benefit plan. Existing law establishes an alternate retirement program and provides that certain state employees, as defined, who become new members of PERS during their first 24 months of employment, do not make contributions to PERS or receive service credit for their service. Under existing law, these members are instead required to contribute either 5% or 6% of their monthly compensation, as specified, to the alternate retirement program. This bill would create a new optional defined contribution plan for new state employees who first begin employment in a miscellaneous or industrial classification on or after January 1, 2020, and who were not members of any public retirement system prior to that date. The bill would require state employees who are subject to the bill's provisions, within 30 days of beginning employment, to choose either to contribute to the defined contribution plan or to become a member of PERS. The bill would require, if an employee fails to make this decision within the above timeframe, that the employee automatically be placed in PERS. The bill would require state employees who opt to participate in this alternate system to contribute the same percent of compensation as similarly situated employees who contribute to the defined pension program, subject to applicable limits of federal law. The bill would authorize an employee in the defined contribution program, after 5 years, to have the right to continue in the program or switch to the defined benefit plan, subject to certain terms and conditions. The bill would require the Department of Human Resources to administer the defined contribution retirement program established by the bill.

died Apr 24, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Showing 151 to 160 of 1,006 bills
Previous 1 … 15 16 17 … 101 Next