CV
D California Assembly · District 13

Asm. Carlos Villapudua

Contact Email
Compare
Total votes
10,395
all sessions
Attendance
92%
657 missed
Lower than 78% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Lower than 97% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 95% of chamber peers
Sponsored
959
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
959 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
959
Primary
77
Co-sponsor
882
This page
959
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 106
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Sri Lankan Independence Day.

This resolution would recognize February 4, 2022, as Sri Lankan Independence Day, and urge all Californians to join in celebrating Sri Lanka's independence.

Signed into law Mar 28, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 2888
In committee · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
State budget: reserves.

Existing law requires the Legislature to pass a budget bill each year prescribing appropriations and expenditures for the ensuing fiscal year. Existing law specifies that General Fund money consists of money received into the state treasury and not required by law to be credited to any other fund. Existing law requires a minimum level of funding to be allocated from the General Fund each year for school districts and community colleges. Existing law also provides for state budget reserves, including the Budget Stabilization Account, the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties, and the Safety Net Reserve. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation providing for budget reserves equal to or greater than 20% of the General Fund budget, excluding funds for the minimum level of school funding allocated pursuant to Proposition 98 of 1988.

In committee Mar 24, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1702
In committee · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Sales and Use Tax Law: exemptions: COVID-19 prevention and response goods.

Existing sales and use tax laws impose taxes on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and provides various exemptions from the taxes imposed by those laws. This bill would exempt from those taxes, until January 1, 2025, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, COVID-19 prevention and response goods, as defined. Existing law requires a bill that would authorize a new tax expenditure under the Sales and Use Tax Law to identify specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax expenditure will achieve, and detailed performance indicators and data collection requirements for determining whether the tax expenditure achieves these goals, purposes, and objectives. This bill would make findings specifying the goal, purpose, and objective of the sales and use tax exemption provided by this bill and the performance indicator to be used, and would require, on or before January 1, 2026, the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to provide a report to the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee and the Senate Governance and Finance Committee on the use of the tax exemption. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

In committee Mar 23, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2132
In committee · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
California Medical School Tuition for Medical Service Pilot Program.

Existing law establishes the Student Aid Commission as the primary state agency for the administration of state-authorized student financial aid programs available to students attending all segments of postsecondary education. Existing law expresses the intent of the Legislature to review, during the annual budget process, the distribution of University of California medical school graduates with regard to placement in areas, and service to populations, underserved by the medical profession, as specified. This bill would establish the California Medical School Tuition for Medical Service Pilot Program under the administration of the Student Aid Commission. The bill would provide financial aid to certain students to support their undergraduate, medical school, and graduate medical educations. The bill would require these students to commit to practicing for a specified period of time in primary care or a high-needs specialty in California in medically underserved populations and areas. The bill would require the commission to begin implementing the pilot program during the 2023–24 academic year, including by developing program eligibility, outreach, and monitoring criteria. The bill would, among other things, require the commission to develop eligibility criteria, including by prioritizing students who are underrepresented in medicine based on race, ethnicity, and language. The bill would establish the Medical School Tuition for Medical Service Pilot Program Scholarship Fund in the State Treasury. The bill would authorize the commission to enter into certain contracts related to the pilot program with nonprofit entities headquartered in California, as specified. The bill would, regarding certain aspects of the pilot program, prohibit an exercise of discretion by the commission and its contractors from being subject to judicial review, except as specified. The bill would make its provisions operative only upon the appropriation of funds for purposes of the pilot program by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or in another statute.

In committee Mar 14, 2022 0 co-sponsors
Showing 681 to 690 of 959 bills
Previous 1 … 68 69 70 … 96 Next