Photo of Marc Levine
D California Assembly · District 10 · Former member

Asm. Marc Levine

Compare
Total votes
32,747
all sessions
Attendance
97%
782 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
98%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
2,304
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
2,304 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,304
Primary
353
Co-sponsor
1,951
This page
2,304
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AB 1637
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Driver's licenses: veteran designation.

(1) Under existing law, when the Department of Motor Vehicles determines that an applicant is lawfully entitled to a driver's license, the department is required to issue that license to the applicant. Existing law specifies the contents of a driver's license and requires the application for a driver's license or identification card to contain a space for an applicant to indicate whether he or she has served in the Armed Forces of the United States and to give his or her consent to be contacted regarding eligibility to receive state or federal veterans' benefits. This bill would, commencing November 11, 2015, allow an applicant for a driver's license or identification card to allow a person to request the driver's license or identification card be printed with the word "VETERAN." The applicant would be required to present to the Department of Motor Vehicles, on a form developed jointly by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Motor Vehicles, proof of veteran status. The bill would require county veterans service offices to verify an applicant's veteran status for these purposes, as specified. The department would be required to print the word "VETERAN" on the face of a driver's license or identification card issued to a person who makes that request and presents that verification to the department. (2) Existing law establishes certain fee amounts for the applications for, and renewal of, driver's licenses and identification cards. This bill would authorize the department to charge an additional fee in an unspecified amount to a person who requests that the person's driver's license or identification card be designated as provided above.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 27
died · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to César Chávez.

This measure would call upon all Californians to observe César Chávez's birthday, March 31, as a day of public service, to recognize the hard work and self-sacrifice that farmworkers go through to feed all the families in our state, and to learn from César Chávez's life and his mission of nonviolence, social justice, and selfless service to others.

died Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 2457
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Assault and battery: stadium or arena.

Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to commit an assault or a battery, except in specified instances, and makes these crimes punishable by a fine, not to exceed $1,000 or $2,000, respectively, or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed 6 months, or by both that fine and imprisonment. This bill would additionally make it a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine, as specified, imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed 6 months, or by both that fine and imprisonment, to commit an assault or battery on stadium or arena property on an event day. The bill would specify that this provision does not apply to sports officials or athletes while engaged in an event. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that every person who willfully commits a trespass is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would make it an infraction, punishable by a fine of up to $250 for each violation, to intentionally leave the area or areas set aside for spectators and enter an area set apart for the participants, performers, officials, attendants, or service personnel at a stadium, auditorium, sports arena, playing field, theater, race track, skating rink, fair, or other place where sporting or theatrical events, or exhibitions, are held, for the purpose of disrupting the event or exhibition, except as specified. The bill would also make it an infraction, punishable by a fine of up to $250 for each violation, to intentionally throw, discharge, or launch any solid or liquid substance or object, or otherwise cause a substance or object to be thrown, discharged, or launched, or to intentionally commit an act that delays the event or interferes with the participants, performers, officials, attendants, service personnel, or spectators at a stadium, auditorium, sports arena, playing field, theater, race track, skating rink, fair, or other place where sporting or theatrical events, or exhibitions, are held, for the purpose of disrupting the event or exhibition, except as specified. By creating new crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 1415
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Administrative regulations: corrosion prevention and mitigation projects.

(1) Existing law contains various provisions relating to contracts by a public entity for the performance of public works of improvement, including provisions for the payment of progress payments and the disbursing and withholding of retention proceeds. This bill would require a public entity that awards a contract for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance work after January 1, 2017, that is paid for in whole or in part with state funds, to require contractors and subcontractors performing corrosion prevention and mitigation work to comply with specified standards to be adopted by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations in consultation with the Department of Toxic Substances Control. The bill would also exempt work on sheet metal and ventilation systems and plumbing and piping systems, and precast concrete work that is performed off site, when the work is performed by specified persons, from the standards adopted under these provisions. (2) The Administrative Procedure Act generally sets forth the requirements for the adoption, publication, review, and implementation of regulations by state agencies. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to of the act provisions. (3) Because this bill would require local entities to comply with additional contracting regulations for these projects, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 2620
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
State contracts: goods and services.

Existing law sets forth requirements for the acquisition of goods and services by state agencies and sets forth the various responsibilities of the Department of General Services and other state agencies in overseeing and implementing state contracting procedures and policies. Specific provisions govern the acquisition of information technology goods and services. This bill would enact the Transportation Sustainability Procurement Program Act to require the department, in consultation with the California Environmental Protection Agency, to develop a sustainability program for the state's procurement of shipping and transportation services for freight, small package delivery, and other forms of cargo. The act would require a contract entered into by a state agency, as defined, for those services, except as specifically exempted in existing law, to require service providers to report specified information relating to energy use and emissions of greenhouse gases to the agency, using generally accepted reporting protocols adopted by the agency for that purpose. The act would impose requirements on the solicitation for the procurement of services to specify how the bidder will be required to report its energy use and associated emissions of greenhouse gases under the contract, and to require a bidder to disclose prescribed information in its responses to the solicitation. The act would require the Director of General Services to adopt rules as specified to encourage all state agencies to use the least costly level of service or mode of transport that can achieve ontime delivery.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1410
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Wildlife management areas: payments.

Existing law requires the Department of Fish and Wildlife, when income is derived directly from real property acquired and operated by the state as a wildlife management area, as defined, to pay annually to the county in which the property is located an amount equal to the county taxes levied upon the property at the time title to the property was transferred to the state, and any assessments levied upon the property by any irrigation, drainage, or reclamation district. This bill would appropriate $19,000,000 from the General Fund to the department to make payments to counties for unpaid amounts under these provisions. The bill would also appropriate $2,000,000 annually, beginning with the 2014–15 fiscal year, from the General Fund to the department to make payments to counties under these provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1171
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Child welfare services: electronic records.

Existing law requires a foster care provider, in consultation with the county case manager, to be responsible for ensuring that a foster youth or nonminor dependent is provided with appropriate referrals to health services when the foster youth either reaches 18 years of age or the nonminor dependent exits foster care, and to the extent county and state resources are provided. This bill would authorize, no later than January 1, 2016, a county to develop and implement a voluntary 3 county pilot program to provide a foster youth, 16 years of age or older, or a nonminor dependent, as defined, upon his or her request, or upon his or her emancipation from, or termination of, dependency or probation, the opportunity to create his or her own singular online electronic record of necessary information and documents, including, but not limited to, medical or health records, a copy of his or her certified birth certificate, and a copy of his or her social security card, to assist him or her in the transition to adulthood. The bill would authorize the pilot program to be developed and implemented only if there are 3 participating counties and would authorize the participating counties, in order to reduce costs, to use existing online electronic systems for purposes of the pilot program. The bill would require the online electronic record to allow the foster youth or nonminor dependent to view, download, upload, and transmit the information and documents. The bill would require a social worker or other representative of the county welfare department, or a probation officer or other representative of the probation department, as appropriate, or another authorized representative as designated by the county or the court to assist the foster youth or nonminor dependent with establishing the electronic record and obtaining the information and electronic copies of the documents. This bill would require the participating counties, in consultation with the State Department of Social Services, to submit a report to the Assembly and Senate Human Services Committees no later than December 1, 2018, evaluating the pilot program and providing recommendations as to whether it should be extended, expanded, or made permanent. The bill's provisions would be implemented only if the Director of Finance makes a written determination that there are sufficient funds available from sources other than the General Fund for this purpose. The bill's provisions would be repealed as of January 1, 2020.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 2033
Failed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Agricultural career technical education: grant funding.

(1) Existing law establishes the Agricultural Career Technical Education Incentive Program, which requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to award a grant, for the purpose of purchasing or leasing agricultural career technical education equipment, to an applicant school district that operates an agricultural career technical education program and that meets specified requirements. Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to annually adopt or update a local control and accountability plan that contains specified information. This bill would continuously appropriate the sum of $4,134,000 in each fiscal year beginning with the 2015–16 fiscal year from the General Fund to the State Department of Education for purposes of funding the Agricultural Career Technical Education Incentive Program. The bill would require the Superintendent to award a grant to a school district that, in addition to meeting the existing requirements, demonstrates how the expenditure of the grant funds will be consistent with its adopted local control and accountability plan. The bill would also express various findings and declarations of the Legislature relating to agricultural career technical education. (2) Funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution.

Failed Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 831
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Political Reform Act of 1974.

(1) The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and related matters, including the reporting of campaign contributions, as defined. Under existing law, a payment made at the behest of a candidate for elective office is considered a contribution unless the payment is made for purposes unrelated to the candidate's candidacy, and a payment is presumed to be unrelated to a candidate's candidacy if it is made principally for legislative, governmental, or charitable purposes. The bill would prohibit an elected officer from requesting that a payment be made, or a person from making a payment, at the behest of the elected officer to a nonprofit organization that is exempt from taxation under Section 501(c) (4) of the Internal Revenue Code and that the elected officer knows or has reason to know is owned or controlled by that officer or specified family members of the officer, except as specified. The bill would provide that an elected officer is deemed to have complied with that requirement if the Commission determines that the elected officer has made a reasonable effort to ascertain whether a nonprofit organization is owned or controlled by any of the specified persons. (2) The act prohibits specified officers from receiving gifts, as defined, in excess of $440 in value from a single source in a calendar year. The act exempts gift payments for the actual costs of specified types of travel that are reasonably related to a legislative or governmental purpose, or to an issue of state, national, or international public policy, from the annual limit on the value of gifts from a single source. This bill would require a nonprofit organization that pays for these types of travel for an elected state officer or local elected officeholder to disclose the names of donors responsible for funding the payments, as specified. The bill would require a person who receives a gift of a travel payment to report the travel destination on his or her statement of economic interests. (3) The act requires that contributions deposited into a campaign account be held in trust for expenses associated with the election of the candidate or for expenses associated with holding office. The act provides that an expenditure to seek office is within the lawful execution of this trust if it is reasonably related to a political purpose and an expenditure associated with holding office is within the lawful execution of this trust if it is reasonably related to a legislative or governmental purpose. Expenditures that confer a substantial personal benefit must be directly related to a political, legislative, or governmental purpose. The act authorizes the use of campaign funds to make donations or loans to bona fide charitable, educational, civic, religious, or similar tax-exempt nonprofit organizations. The act imposes additional limitations on certain expenditures, including those relating to automotive expenses, travel expenses, tickets for entertainment or sporting events, personal gifts, and real property expenses. The bill would prohibit an elected officer or a committee controlled by the elected officer from making an expenditure of campaign funds to a nonprofit organization that is exempt from taxation under Section 501(c) (4) of the Internal Revenue Code and that is owned or controlled by the officer or specified family members of the officer, as specified. This bill would also limit the expenditure of campaign funds for other purposes, as specified, including personal vacations, payments for membership dues for a country club, health club, or other recreational facility, specified tuition payments, utility payments, vehicle use that is not directly related to an election campaign, and certain gifts for specified family members of a candidate, elected officer, or other individuals with the authority to approve the expenditure of campaign funds held by a committee. (4) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 89513 of the Government Code, proposed by AB 1666 and AB 1692, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2015, and this bill is chaptered last. (5) A violation of the act's provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (6) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Vetoed Nov 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 785
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Design-build.

Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and various local agencies to use the design-build procurement process for specified public works under different laws. Existing law also authorizes the formation of special districts, including the Marin Healthcare District and the San Diego Unified Port District. This bill would repeal those authorizations, and enact provisions that would authorize, until January 1, 2025, the Department of General Services, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and those local agencies, as defined, to use the design-build procurement process for specified public works. The bill would authorize, until January 1, 2025, the Marin Healthcare District to use the design-build process when contracting for the construction of a building and improvements directly related to a hospital or health facility building at the Marin General Hospital, and would authorize the San Diego Unified Port District to use the design-build procurement process for the construction of a building or buildings and improvements directly related to the construction of a building or buildings that exceed $1,000,000. The bill would require specified information to be verified under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Marin Healthcare District and for the San Diego Unified Port District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Sep 30, 2014 1 co-sponsor
Showing 1,561 to 1,570 of 2,304 bills