Issue · Education

Education

Every education bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Pilar Schiavo
100% support rate
Top opponent
Stan Ellis
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving education in California

Legislators moving education in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Pilar Schiavo
Pilar Schiavo House · District 40
D
Strong +
100% 54
Eloise Reyes
Eloise Reyes Senate · District 29
D
Strong +
100% 53
Cottie Petrie-Norris
Cottie Petrie-Norris House · District 73
D
Strong +
100% 51
Ash Kalra
Ash Kalra House · District 25
D
Strong +
99% 70
Catherine Stefani
Catherine Stefani House · District 19
D
Strong +
99% 68
Stan Ellis
Stan Ellis House · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 48
Natasha Johnson
Natasha Johnson House · District 63
R
Strong −
0% 36
James Gallagher
James Gallagher House · District 3
R
Strong −
2% 40
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
3% 62
Roger Niello
Roger Niello Senate · District 6
R
Strong −
4% 49
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All education bills

signed · California · Assembly Oct 13, 2025

AB 681: California DREAM Loan Program: limits.

Existing law establishes the California DREAM Loan Program, which authorizes a student attending a participating campus of the University of California or California State University to receive a loan, referred to as a DREAM loan, if the student satisfies certain requirements. Existing law prohibits a student from borrowing more than $4,000 within a single academic year and more than $40,000 in the aggregate under the program. Existing law prohibits a student enrolled in an undergraduate program from borrowing more than $20,000 as an undergraduate student and prohibits a student enrolled in a graduate program from borrowing more than $20,000 as a graduate student. This bill would instead prohibit a student enrolled in an undergraduate program from borrowing more than $4,000 within a single academic year, and a student enrolled in a graduate program from borrowing more than $20,500 within a single academic year. The bill would increase the aggregate limit under the program for a student enrolled in a graduate program to $118,500 as a graduate student, while maintaining the $20,000 aggregate limit under the program for a student enrolled in an undergraduate program, thereby increasing the overall aggregate limit under the program for a student who receives a DREAM loan for both undergraduate and graduate enrollment to $138,500.
failed · California · Assembly May 13, 2025

AB 329: California Healthy Youth Act: adoption.

Existing law, the California Healthy Youth Act, requires school districts, charter schools, county boards of education, county superintendents of schools, the California School for the Deaf, and the California School for the Blind to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention education, as specified. The act requires that instruction to include, among other things, information about the effectiveness and safety of all federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -approved contraceptive methods in preventing pregnancy, including, but not limited to, emergency contraception, and requires instruction on pregnancy to include an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption, and abortion. This bill would require the discussion of adoption to include a comprehensive explanation of, and information on, the types of adoption, the rights of a placing birth parent, and specific local adoption resources and support. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.