Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Human Trafficking)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Mark González
100% support rate
Top opponent
David Tangipa
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving human trafficking in California

Legislators moving human trafficking in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
MG
Mark González House · District 54
D
Strong +
100% 9
LaShae Sharp-Collins
LaShae Sharp-Collins House · District 79
D
Strong +
100% 7
Buffy Wicks
Buffy Wicks House · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 6
Gail Pellerin
Gail Pellerin House · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 6
Jessica Caloza
Jessica Caloza House · District 52
D
Strong +
100% 6
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 6
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
0% 6
Heather Hadwick
Heather Hadwick House · District 1
R
Strong −
0% 4
Joshua Hoover
Joshua Hoover House · District 7
R
Strong −
0% 4
Juan Alanis
Juan Alanis House · District 22
R
Strong −
0% 4
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · California · Assembly Apr 7, 2026

AB 2749: Crimes: loitering.

Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for any person to loiter in any public place with the intent to purchase commercial sex, as specified. Under existing law, intent is evidenced by acting in a manner and under circumstances that openly demonstrate the purpose of inducing, enticing, or soliciting prostitution, or procuring another to commit prostitution, as specified. This bill would instead provide that a person is guilty of the above-described crime only if they take a direct but ineffectual act that goes beyond planning or preparation towards commission of the crime that indicates a definite and unambiguous intent to purchase commercial sex. The bill would not require the act to be a completed communication.
Sub-Topics Human Trafficking
passed both · California · Assembly Aug 25, 2026

AB 2691: Elections: elective office: felony conviction.

Existing law prohibits the consideration of a person as a candidate for, and provides that the person is not eligible to be elected to, any state or local elective office if the person has been convicted of a felony involving accepting or giving, or offering to give, any bribe, the embezzlement of public money, extortion or theft of public money, perjury, or conspiracy to commit any of those crimes. This bill would additionally prohibit the consideration of a person as a candidate for, and provide that the person is not eligible to be elected to, any state or local elective office if they have been convicted of a felony involving sexual assault or human trafficking, as defined.
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 1464: Housing preferences.

Existing law establishes the state prisons under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Existing law requires an individual incarcerated by the department who is transgender, nonbinary, or intersex, regardless of anatomy, to be housed at a correctional facility designated for men or women based on the individual's preference, except as specified for management or security concerns. This bill would require the department to deny a housing preference by an individual who is transgender, nonbinary, or intersex, regardless of anatomy, and require an individual to be housed in a facility consistent with the individual's anatomy, if the individual has been convicted of, or the department has credible evidence that the individual has committed, specific offenses, including, among others, rape or human trafficking, against one or more victims with a gender opposite to that of the individual, as determined by the individual's anatomy.
failed · California · Assembly Jun 4, 2025

AB 433: Mental health diversion.

Existing law authorizes the court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant diagnosed with a mental disorder if the defendant satisfies certain eligibility requirements and if the court determines that the defendant is suitable for diversion. Existing law excludes a defendant from diversion for specified charged offenses, including, among others, murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape, or continuous sexual abuse of a child, as specified. This bill would expand those exclusions to prohibit a defendant from being placed into a diversion program if they are charged with child abuse and endangerment, inflicting cruel or inhuman corporal punishment on a child resulting in an injury, assault of a child under 8 years of age resulting in the death of the child, human trafficking, and any crime that causes great bodily injury, as specified.