Rep. David Marshall

Maddy summaryHB 2337 requires Arizona counties with under 500,000 residents to obtain unanimous approval with all commission members present for wind or solar project permits (including conditional/special use permits or zoning changes). The bill prohibits voting on such applications if any commission member is absent or if a vacancy exists, mandating full attendance before approval. It directly affects renewable energy developers seeking permits in smaller counties but does not change project requirements or apply to larger counties. This is a procedural voting rule, not a substantive policy change to energy development.

Maddy summaryHB 2374 requires Arizona zoning commissioners to disclose any "substantial interest" they or their relatives have in land under consideration by the commission, and to recuse themselves from voting on that matter. It directly affects local zoning commissioners who may have personal financial ties to properties under review. The bill defines "substantial interest" as per existing law (ARS § 38-502) and mandates that commissioners formally record such disclosures in official records. This rule aims to prevent conflicts of interest in zoning decisions without altering the commission's substantive authority. The bill is currently in early legislative stages (House first/second reading as of 2026).

Maddy summaryHB 2338 requires counties with fewer than 500,000 residents to obtain unanimous approval from all voting board members and every affected supervisory district before approving zoning permits for wind or solar projects. The bill mandates that all board members must be present for the vote, a majority must approve, and each district containing part of the project must vote yes. It also prohibits voting if a board member is absent or recused from a district affected by the project, requiring unanimous consent in those cases. This law directly affects local county boards and renewable energy developers seeking zoning approvals in smaller Arizona counties.

Maddy summaryHB 2339 amends Arizona's contractor licensure laws by revising the duties and procedures of the Registrar of Contractors. It requires the registrar to maintain detailed license records, post applicant information online for 20 days, and follow specific processes for rule changes and informal dispute resolution. The bill also updates fee allocations, directing 85% of collected fees to the Registrar of Contractors Fund and 15% to the state general fund. The bill does not address solar devices, despite its title, and focuses solely on administrative changes to contractor licensing.

Maddy summaryHB 2152 amends Arizona's retail tax code to add new exemptions from state sales tax. It specifically removes sales tax on medical items like insulin, prescription eyewear, prosthetics, durable medical equipment (e.g., wheelchairs), and hearing aids. The bill also exempts food purchased with SNAP benefits, school meals, textbooks, and certain business services. These changes directly affect retailers selling these items, healthcare providers, schools, and food assistance programs by reducing taxable sales. The policy updates the existing tax code without altering broader tax structures.

Maddy summaryHCR 2055 is a voter referendum (not enacted law) proposing that Arizona declare drug cartels "terrorist organizations" under state law and direct the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to address this threat. It defines "drug cartel" as groups engaging in human smuggling, drug trafficking, or terrorism, and states that this declaration does not affect asylum claims under federal law. The resolution cites voter-approved Proposition 314 and findings about border security concerns, including fentanyl trafficking and border crossings by individuals on terrorist watchlists. This measure failed to pass in the June 27, 2025, vote and did not become law.

Maddy summaryHB 2401 appropriates $4 million from Arizona's state general fund for fiscal year 2025-2026 to the Department of Administration, which will distribute the funds to the town of Taylor. The money is specifically designated to expand the Taylor rodeo grounds. This bill directly affects the town of Taylor by providing state funding for infrastructure improvements at their rodeo facility. It is a straightforward funding measure with no additional policy provisions or voting requirements.

Maddy summaryHCR 2013 is a proposed law requiring Arizona counties to verify voters' addresses before mailing early ballots and restricting foreign funding in election administration. It mandates that large counties (500,000+ population) require voters to confirm their address each election cycle via mail, phone, or online portal before receiving an early ballot, while smaller counties must do so every four years. The measure also prohibits government election administration from using funds from foreign governments or non-U.S. individuals, requiring vendors to certify annually they receive no such funds and imposing misdemeanor penalties for violations. This referendum failed to pass in June 2025 and would require voter approval to become law.

Maddy summaryHB 2386 establishes a "parity compensation fund" specifically for state law enforcement personnel to help recruit and retain officers. It requires the state to annually compare its law enforcement compensation (including base pay, bonuses, and retirement contributions) to the three largest county or municipal law enforcement agencies in Arizona, using these benchmarks to guide fund spending. The bill amends reporting requirements so all state agencies must include these compensation benchmarks in their annual personnel reports. This directly affects state law enforcement officers by creating a mechanism to align their pay with local peer agencies. The fund's monies are exempt from standard budget lapsing rules and must be used for salaries/benefits to enhance recruitment and retention.

Maddy summaryHCR 2021 would require Arizona cities and towns to exempt most food for home or on-premises consumption from municipal sales taxes, prohibiting differential tax rates on specific food items. It sets a deadline of June 30, 2027, for cities to comply, limits tax increases to 2% without voter approval, and bans new food taxes or rate hikes in the 24 months before that date. This affects local governments (cities/towns), food retailers, restaurants, and residents purchasing food, as it standardizes food tax treatment and restricts local tax authority over food sales. The bill also exempts SNAP/food stamp purchases and food packaging from taxation. It requires voter approval for any new food tax or rate increase beyond 2% and applies retroactively to December 31, 2024.