Maddy summaryHB 2927 requires all Arizona public bodies (including cities, counties, school boards, and commissions) to post meeting minutes and recordings online within specific timeframes. It mandates that minutes include voting records, legal actions discussed, and speaker details, with cities/towns required to post summaries within 2 days after approved minutes. The bill also specifies that recordings must be available online within three business days for most meetings, and public bodies must provide adequate seating for attendees. These requirements aim to increase transparency by making government deliberations more accessible to the public.
Rep. Neal Carter
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryHB 2742 streamlines the process for requesting court-ordered mental health evaluations in Arizona. It requires standardized application forms with specific details about the person needing evaluation (including behavioral evidence, treatment history, and witness information), and mandates that screening agencies process applications within 48 hours. The bill explicitly protects individuals receiving treatment through recognized religious practices from involuntary evaluation unless a court determines they pose a danger to self or others. This affects individuals with serious mental health concerns who are unwilling or unable to seek voluntary care, as well as healthcare providers, law enforcement, and courts handling such cases.
Maddy summaryHB 2119 requires Arizona municipalities to provide 60 days' advance notice on their website before approving new or increased taxes or fees affecting businesses. This includes publishing the tax amount, supporting data, and a meeting notice 15 days prior. The law applies to most municipal taxes and fees but excludes water/wastewater rates, court fees, and federally mandated charges. It directly affects cities (as issuers of taxes) and businesses paying those taxes, ensuring transparency before tax changes take effect.
Maddy summaryHCR 2049 is a symbolic resolution passed by Arizona's legislature, not a binding law. It asserts Arizona's sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment by declaring the state will not use state personnel or funds to enforce federal laws or programs deemed unconstitutional by Arizona. The resolution demands the federal government cease "commandeering" state actions and prohibits Arizona from complying with federal mandates that courts have ruled unconstitutionally coercive. It serves as a formal statement sent to federal officials, emphasizing Arizona's position but having no legal effect on federal law or enforcement.
Maddy summaryHB 2391 amends Arizona law to adjust signature requirements for candidates running for justice of the peace or constable positions. It sets specific minimum and maximum signature thresholds based on county population: for counties with under 1 million residents, candidates need at least 1% but no more than 300 signatures from qualified voters in their precinct. For larger counties (1 million+ residents), the same 1% minimum applies but with a 10% maximum cap. This directly affects local election candidates in justice of the peace and constable races across Arizona counties. The bill clarifies existing rules without creating new offices or altering broader election procedures.
Maddy summaryHB 2733 grants legal immunity to Arizona government agencies and employees (like law enforcement) who intercept, disable, or destroy unmanned aircraft (drones) within 30 miles of the state's international border. It protects them from liability for injuries caused during these actions unless they intentionally harmed someone or were grossly negligent. The law specifically applies to drone operators (defined as anyone controlling a drone, including owners or groups acting together) and covers contractors working for government entities. This bill directly affects border enforcement practices and drone operators operating near Arizona's international border.
Maddy summaryHB 2657 is a definitions bill that clarifies key terms used in Arizona’s trust and estate law, such as "agent," "beneficiary," "electronic will," and "distributee." It standardizes language to ensure consistent interpretation of estate documents, including how electronic wills must be executed and verified. This bill directly affects individuals managing estates (like executors), beneficiaries, and anyone using digital tools for estate planning. It does not create new rules but provides clearer guidance for existing legal processes.
Maddy summaryHB 2607 increases sentencing for fentanyl offenses involving large quantities (200+ grams) in motor vehicles or for sale. It mandates a minimum 5-year prison sentence (up to 15 years) for possessing fentanyl in a vehicle or selling it in such amounts, with harsher penalties (10-20 years) for repeat offenses. The bill also requires a $2,000+ fine, prohibits probation for these offenses, and mandates 360 hours of community service with drug rehabilitation or victim services. This law directly affects individuals convicted of qualifying fentanyl-related crimes in Arizona.
Maddy summaryHB 2653 requires Arizona law enforcement and prosecutors to redact victims' personal details - including names, addresses, phone numbers, and Social Security numbers - from public records and case disclosures in criminal cases, unless specific exceptions apply. Victims can request this redaction if disclosure might lead to harassment, threats, or witness tampering. Exceptions include when the victim (or their representative for minors) consents, a court orders disclosure, or the information is needed for a defendant's constitutional rights. The bill also clarifies that a victim's address may still be disclosed in body-worn camera footage if the defendant already knows it due to a domestic relationship.
Maddy summaryHB 2741 modifies Arizona's liquor licensing rules by adjusting how many new bar, beer/wine bar, and liquor store licenses are issued each year based on county population growth (increasing from 5,000 to 10,000 people per new license for beer/wine bars starting in 2022). It requires new license holders to pay a fee equal to the current market value of similar licenses in their county, determined through appraisals. The bill also limits off-sale liquor sales (e.g., takeout) to no more than 30% of total on-sale sales at licensed establishments. Additionally, it allows license holders to combine multiple license types (like bar + liquor store) at a single location under specific conditions. This law directly affects businesses seeking new liquor licenses or expanding existing operations in Arizona.