Rep. Ralph Heap

Maddy summaryHB 2520 amends Arizona's duress defense law to limit when a defendant can claim they committed a crime due to threats of immediate physical force. Specifically, the defense cannot be used if the defendant intentionally created the situation where they faced duress, or for offenses involving homicide, serious physical injury, or certain violent crimes like aggravated assault or sexual offenses. This change directly affects criminal defendants in cases where they attempt to justify their actions using duress as a legal defense. The bill clarifies that the duress defense is unavailable for the most serious violent offenses, making it harder for defendants to avoid responsibility for those acts.

Maddy summaryThis bill amends Arizona law to set a salary cap for university presidents at twenty times the annual salary of state legislators. It directly affects Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR) university presidents and the Board itself, which appoints them. The key provision modifies Section 15-1626, subsection 2, to establish this maximum compensation limit, ensuring presidential pay does not exceed this threshold.

Maddy summaryHB 2199 requires that advertisements for prescription and nonprescription drugs on TV, radio, or online must clearly present major side effects and usage restrictions ("major statement") at the same volume, clarity, and pace as the rest of the ad. It prohibits using distracting audio or visual elements that could interfere with understanding these critical health details. The bill directly affects drug manufacturers and advertisers operating in Arizona. If passed, it would mandate that health risks are communicated as prominently as promotional content in digital and broadcast ads.

Maddy summaryThis bill adds specific protections for peace officers who intercept, disable, or destroy unmanned aircraft (drones) within 30 miles of Arizona's international border. It expands qualified immunity under Arizona law, shielding public employees and contractors from lawsuits for injuries caused during such drone operations unless the officer acted with gross negligence or intent to cause harm. The law explicitly states that drone operators cannot hold officers liable for injuries resulting from these border-related drone interventions. This directly affects drone operators who may no longer pursue legal claims against law enforcement for such incidents near the border.

Maddy summaryThis bill allocates $39.6 million from the state general fund for fiscal year 2025-2026 to extend State Route 24 in Queen Creek, including a new interchange at Ironwood Road. The funds are specifically for the town of Queen Creek to cover all necessary project expenses, with the requirement that Queen Creek collaborate with Pinal County before spending. This is a straightforward funding measure for a specific infrastructure project, with no policy changes or broad impacts beyond the designated location and recipient.

Maddy summaryHB 2276 requires Arizona state agencies to submit proposed rules expected to increase regulatory costs for businesses by more than $100,000 within five years for review by the Office of Economic Opportunity. If the cost exceeds $500,000, the rule cannot take effect until the legislature passes separate legislation approving it. Agencies cannot finalize such rules without this legislative approval, and if the legislature doesn't act during the session, the proposed rule must be terminated. This directly affects state agencies creating new rules and businesses subject to those rules, adding a legislative review step for high-cost regulations.

Maddy summaryHCR 2012 is a proposed voter referendum that would amend Arizona's income tax code to reduce tax rates for most taxpayers. If approved by voters, it would adjust the tax brackets and rates for both single filers and joint filers, lowering the percentage rates applied to taxable income across multiple income tiers. The bill directly affects Arizona residents who file state income tax returns, potentially reducing their tax burden for taxable years beginning after 2021. It is not yet law but requires voter approval to take effect, as indicated by its referendum language and current status in the legislative process (House first/second reading). The bill focuses on modifying existing tax rate structures rather than creating new tax policies.