Home › Wisconsin › Bills
Bills

Wisconsin Bills

Track legislation and stay informed about the bills that matter to you.

Bill results

failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 230: Relating to: requiring retail sellers to accept cash and providing a penalty. (FE)

AB 230 requires physical retail stores to accept cash payments during face-to-face transactions with customers. It directly affects brick-and-mortar businesses selling goods or services in person, unless other laws prohibit cash acceptance. Retailers violating this rule face fines of $200 to $5,000 per violation, or court-ordered injunctions to stop the violation. The law does not apply to online sales or situations where cash acceptance is legally restricted.
Dan Knodl (R) Dave Murphy (R) Chanz Green (R) Amanda Nedweski (R) Jim Piwowarczyk (R)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 139: Relating to: a tax credit for relocating to this state due to Hurricane Helene or the Los Angeles wildfires. (FE)

AB 139 creates a $10,000 tax credit for residents of Los Angeles County, California, or North Carolina who relocated to this state due to Hurricane Helene (2024) or the Los Angeles wildfires (January 2025). It directly affects individuals who lived in those areas before the disasters, moved to this state because of them, and filed income tax returns in LA County or North Carolina for 2022-2023. To qualify, claimants must not have a felony conviction and must file the credit within the timeframe specified in tax law. The credit applies against state income tax for taxable years 2025, up to the full amount of the tax liability.
Barbara Dittrich (R) Cindi Duchow (R) Jessie Rodriguez (R) Jeff Mursau (R) Scott Krug (R)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 205: Relating to: serving maple syrup in a public eating place.

AB 205 creates a new statute (97.19) requiring that any product labeled as "maple syrup" served in public eating places must be made entirely of maple syrup. It directly affects restaurants and food service establishments that serve items marketed as maple syrup. The bill prohibits serving products identified as maple syrup unless they contain 100% maple syrup, while allowing non-maple syrup products to be served if they aren't labeled as maple syrup. This clarifies labeling standards for consumers and aligns with federal definitions for maple syrup.
Karen Kirsch (D) Alex Joers (D) Tara Johnson (D) Mike Bare (D) Randy Udell (D)
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 195: Relating to: serving maple syrup in a public eating place.

SB 195 prohibits public eating places (like restaurants) from serving any product labeled as "maple syrup" unless it consists entirely of maple syrup, as defined by federal regulations (21 CFR 168.140). The bill specifically targets mislabeling, allowing establishments to serve non-maple products only if they are not marketed as maple syrup. It directly affects restaurants and food service businesses that sell syrup-based items. The law creates a clear labeling standard without restricting other menu items. This is a straightforward regulatory measure focused on product transparency.
Brad Pfaff (D) Cory Tomczyk (R) Mark Spreitzer (D) Dianne Hesselbein (D) Jamie Wall (D)
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 58: Relating to: referendum questions for certain referenda that affect property taxes. (FE)

Senate Bill 58 modifies the information provided on ballots for certain referenda that affect property taxes. It requires these ballot questions to include a good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference a median-valued, single-family residence would experience if the referendum passes, along with the property value used for the estimate. For bond referenda, the bill also mandates the inclusion of the estimated interest rate, total interest accruing, and any fees for bond defeasance. These changes affect voters and local political subdivisions by providing more detailed financial impact information for property tax-related ballot measures.
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 81: Relating to: school district operating referenda.

Senate Bill 81 modifies the process for school district operating referenda in Wisconsin. It requires school board resolutions for referenda to clearly specify if proposed excess revenue is for recurring or nonrecurring purposes, and the exact amount for each. The bill also mandates that the referendum ballot itself must state if any approved excess revenue is for a nonrecurring purpose and its corresponding amount. A key change is that only excess revenue approved for recurring purposes will be included in the base for determining future revenue limits, while nonrecurring excess revenue will not be added to this base. This affects how school districts manage their budgets and how voters are informed about these proposals.
Steve Nass (R) Cory Tomczyk (R) Chris Kapenga (R)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AJR 8: Relating to: restricting the governor’s partial veto authority to only rejecting entire bill sections of an appropriation bill that are capable of separate enactment and reducing appropriations in a bill (first consideration).

AJR 8 proposes a constitutional amendment to limit the governor's partial veto power on budget bills. It would prevent the governor from rejecting small parts of a bill (like single words or sentences) and require that any vetoed section must be a complete, standalone law that can function independently. The bill specifically targets appropriation bills, restricting the governor to vetoing entire sections that are capable of separate enactment. This is a proposed constitutional change, not a law, and would need voter approval to take effect. The amendment aims to reduce the governor's ability to alter budget bills through partial vetoes.
Barbara Dittrich (R) Scott Allen (R) Dan Knodl (R) Karen Hurd (R) Dave Murphy (R)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 286: Relating to: interest earned on coronavirus state and local fiscal recovery funds. (FE)

AB 286 redirects $172 million in interest earned from unused coronavirus state and local fiscal recovery funds to the general state fund. It applies to funds held under specific state appropriations (section 20.505(1)(mb)) that were not spent by the deadline. The bill transfers this interest directly to the general fund on its effective date, rather than allowing it to remain in the recovery fund. This is a procedural adjustment to reallocate existing interest earnings, not a new funding program.
Barbara Dittrich (R) Dan Knodl (R) Cindi Duchow (R) Dave Murphy (R) Chanz Green (R)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 289: Relating to: ban on the use of certain insecticides by the Department of Natural Resources.

AB 289 bans the Department of Natural Resources from using neonicotinoid insecticides on state-owned lands it acquires and maintains. The bill directly affects the department’s land management practices, prohibiting these specific insecticides on properties covered under section 23.09(2)(d) of the statutes. Exceptions include existing cooperative farming agreements entered before the law's effective date and insecticide use for forest pest control on state forests, nurseries, or infested zones. The law creates a clear policy change for pesticide use on public lands while maintaining necessary exemptions for forestry and agriculture partnerships.
Alex Joers (D) Tara Johnson (D) Mike Bare (D) Christine Sinicki (D) Karen DeSanto (D)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 287: Relating to: local regulation of pesticides to protect pollinators.

AB 287 creates a new section of state law allowing local governments (like cities or counties) to regulate pesticides specifically to protect pollinators, such as bees and butterflies. The bill defines "pollinator" as insects that pollinate flowers and establishes a legal basis for local ordinances restricting pesticide use in ways that safeguard these insects and their habitats. This legislation directly affects local governments, enabling them to develop their own pesticide rules without overriding state law, while focusing on concrete protection for pollinators rather than imposing new statewide restrictions.
Alex Joers (D) Tara Johnson (D) Mike Bare (D) Joe Sheehan (D) Christine Sinicki (D)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 305: Relating to: designating the rusty patched bumble bee as the state native insect.

AB 305 designates the rusty patched bumble bee (*Bombus affinis*) as Wisconsin's official state native insect. The bill amends Wisconsin statutes to add this designation to the list of state symbols included in the Wisconsin Blue Book. This is a symbolic, non-regulatory change that does not alter any policies or regulations affecting the public or environment. The bill creates a new statutory section (1.10 (3) (w)) and updates a reference in another section to include "native insect" in the Blue Book's listings.
Karen Kirsch (D) Maureen McCarville (D) Alex Joers (D) Tara Johnson (D) Joe Sheehan (D)
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AJR 62: Relating to: designating June 2025 as Pollinator Awareness Month in Wisconsin.

This resolution designates June 2025 as Pollinator Awareness Month in Wisconsin. It recognizes the ecological and economic importance of pollinators (like bees and butterflies) to agriculture and ecosystems, citing their role in producing food and supporting Wisconsin's $230 million in pollinator-dependent crops. The resolution has no regulatory effect - it is purely ceremonial, aiming to raise public awareness through existing community efforts like "No Mow May" rather than creating new policies or programs.
Alex Joers (D) Tara Johnson (D) Christine Sinicki (D) Karen DeSanto (D) Lee Snodgrass (D)
Showing 1,537 to 1,548 of 12,159 bills