Rep. Mia Gregerson

Maddy summaryHB 2210 authorizes Washington state local governments (counties, cities, towns, school districts, fire districts, and port districts) to adopt ranked choice voting (RCV) or proportional representation for elections. It requires jurisdictions choosing RCV to implement it by December 31, 2032, with specific rules for ballot design, candidate ranking, and election types (e.g., single-winner contests use instant runoff voting). The bill creates legal clarity for these election methods during a six-year period, reducing litigation risk while federal voting rights standards evolve, and allows jurisdictions to continue using approved systems beyond the six years. It does not alter existing voting rights protections under state law.

Maddy summaryHB 2481 bans grocery stores from using computer systems to charge different prices based on personal data like shopping habits, location, or inferred characteristics (e.g., income or race). It also requires a four-year temporary pause on all electronic shelf label systems that could collect consumer data from devices to adjust prices. The law directly affects grocery retailers using dynamic pricing technology, exempting small businesses. It aims to ensure prices remain fair and transparent, preventing personalized pricing without clear disclosure. The bill defines key terms like "inferred data" and "electronic shelf label systems" to clarify these prohibitions.

Maddy summaryHB 2655 provides a sales and use tax exemption for new data centers in specific eastern Washington counties (east of the Cascades, bordering another state, with at least 500,000 residents). It covers construction, equipment, and power infrastructure costs for qualifying data centers, but requires them to create a minimum of 35 family-wage jobs or 3 jobs per 20,000 square feet of server space within six years. The exemption expires in 2048, and tax certificates must be renewed every two years, with job requirements verified annually. This policy directly affects data center developers in targeted counties seeking tax savings tied to job creation.

Maddy summaryHB 2499 modernizes election procedures for conservation district supervisors in Washington by extending their terms from three to four years and requiring financial disclosures from both current supervisors and candidates. The bill amends state laws to adjust election timing, term assignments (such as awarding the top vote-getter a four-year term in initial elections), and voting rules, while mandating transparency through financial disclosures. This directly affects conservation districts and their supervisors, updating outdated election processes to increase accountability in local governance.

Maddy summaryHB 2483 creates a state registry requiring data brokers in Washington to register with the Department of Licensing by May 2028. It applies to businesses that collect and sell personal information like names, addresses, Social Security numbers, or biometric data (e.g., fingerprints) without consumer consent. The law defines "data broker" broadly but excludes credit bureaus, financial institutions under federal law, and businesses collecting data from customers or employees. The registry aims to increase transparency about who collects and sells Washington residents' personal data, without regulating how data is handled.

Maddy summaryHB 2144 requires Washington employers to provide written notice to employees before using electronic monitoring (such as AI tools, cameras, or software) to assist in performance evaluations. Employers must give at least 30 days' notice before starting new monitoring, 60 days for existing monitoring, and notify new hires at the time of the job offer. The notice must explain how monitoring is used (e.g., tracking productivity) and how data is verified. Violations can result in Department of Labor investigations and civil penalties up to $5,000 for willful violations, with enforcement applying to all employers in Washington state.

Maddy summaryHB 2116 updates Washington state's school enrichment funding by setting new annual limits on property taxes districts can levy for programs like arts, sports, and after-school activities. For taxes collected through 2029, districts may levy up to $2.50 per $1,000 of property value, increasing to $3.00 per $1,000 starting in 2030. The bill also creates a state-local effort assistance program that provides supplemental funding to districts levying below $1.50 per $1,000, matching a portion of their levy up to a per-student cap adjusted for inflation. School districts must now obtain approval for their enrichment spending plans before seeking voter approval for new levies.

Maddy summaryHB 2724 proposes a new tax on Washington residents with annual adjusted gross income of $1 million or more, affecting approximately the top 0.5% of households. The tax revenue would be deposited into the state general fund to support K-12 education, health care, higher education, human services, and the working families' tax credit. Key provisions include exempting sales of family-owned small businesses and real property from the tax, aligning the state definition of taxable income with federal rules (modified for state purposes), and reducing other taxes like sales tax on essential items. The bill aims to make the state tax system less regressive by shifting more burden to high earners while maintaining current tax rates for lower-income residents.

Maddy summaryHB 2725 reverts Washington state's estate tax rates to levels in effect before July 1, 2025, by amending RCW 83.100.040. It directly affects Washington residents with taxable estates exceeding $1 million, as it reduces tax rates for estates valued between $1 million and $9 million. The bill changes the tax brackets - for example, lowering the top rate from 35% to 20% for estates over $9 million - based on the decedent's death date. This policy change applies to estates of decedents dying on or after specific dates in 2025 and 2026, undoing recent increases enacted in 2025.

Maddy summaryHB 2489 establishes statewide rules preventing local governments from penalizing people for basic life-sustaining activities (like sleeping or eating in public) when no adequate shelter is available. It requires cities to prove shelter space existed before enforcing public space laws, and invalidates citations or prosecutions that violate this rule. The bill protects individuals experiencing homelessness from punishment for necessary activities while ensuring enforcement actions are limited to immediate safety risks. It does not create a right to shelter, but mandates cities to document shelter availability and coordinate with service providers to address homelessness.