Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Law Enforcement)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Washington, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
72
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Deb Krishnadasan
92% support rate
Top opponent
Jeff Wilson
17% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving law enforcement in Washington

Legislators moving law enforcement in Washington
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Deb Krishnadasan
Deb Krishnadasan Senate · District 26
D
Strong +
92% 12
Jesse Salomon
Jesse Salomon Senate · District 32
D
Strong +
92% 12
Adison Richards
Adison Richards House · District 26
D
Strong +
84% 50
Annette Cleveland
Annette Cleveland Senate · District 49
D
Strong +
83% 12
Claire Wilson
Claire Wilson Senate · District 30
D
Strong +
83% 12
Jeff Wilson
Jeff Wilson Senate · District 19
R
Strong −
17% 12
Jim McCune
Jim McCune Senate · District 2
R
Strong −
17% 12
Judy Warnick
Judy Warnick Senate · District 13
R
Strong −
17% 12
Leonard Christian
Leonard Christian Senate · District 4
R
Strong −
17% 12
Mark Schoesler
Mark Schoesler Senate · District 9
R
Strong −
17% 12
Showing 11–20 of 72 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Washington · House Jan 27, 2026

HB 2686: Exempting certain petitions for dissolution of marriage from the expense of filing and service of process.

HB 2686 exempts certain divorce petitioners from filing fees and service costs if domestic violence occurred during the marriage. Specifically, it waives all fees for filing a dissolution petition and requires law enforcement to serve the petition at no cost to the petitioner if a domestic violence protection order was issued against the respondent or if the respondent was charged with domestic violence. This applies directly to individuals seeking divorce who have experienced domestic violence, as defined in state law. The bill ensures these petitioners avoid financial barriers to accessing the court system while prioritizing their safety. It does not change existing fee structures for other divorce cases.
in committee · Washington · House Jan 27, 2026

HB 2387: Concerning elected sheriffs.

HB 2387 clarifies that elected sheriffs not certified as peace officers under Washington law cannot personally perform law enforcement actions reserved for certified officers, though they retain authority for actions authorized by law. The bill automatically triggers recall proceedings if a sheriff’s certification is revoked for misconduct occurring after their term began - specifically, mandatory decertification (under RCW 43.101.105(2)) eliminates the need to collect voter signatures for a recall election. It amends laws to require the Criminal Justice Training Commission to initiate recalls upon certification revocation and specifies that no signatures are needed for such cases. This applies only to sheriffs who lack peace officer certification, directly affecting their accountability process for post-term misconduct.
Sub-Topics Law Enforcement
in committee · Washington · Senate Jan 12, 2026

SB 5958: Creating an additional regional training option for the basic law enforcement academy.

SB 5958 creates two additional annual basic law enforcement training classes at a regional academy in the largest city of any Washington county with over 300,000 residents. It appropriates $5 million from the general fund for the 2026-2027 fiscal year to cover these new classes, which are in addition to existing training. The bill requires the Criminal Justice Training Commission to track and report average student wait times annually to the legislature. This provision expires July 1, 2045.
passed · Washington · Senate Mar 12, 2026

SB 6070: Supporting the recovery of missing persons.

Washington State's SB 6070 requires law enforcement to obtain a court order before using certain surveillance tools - including pen registers, trap and trace devices, and cell site simulators (devices that mimic cell towers) - to locate missing endangered persons. The bill amends existing laws to specify that these tools may only be deployed when investigating a missing person who qualifies as "endangered" under state law. Courts must approve such orders based on probable cause that the tools will help locate the missing person or gather evidence related to their disappearance. This law directly affects law enforcement agencies conducting missing persons investigations and ensures judicial oversight for these intrusive surveillance methods.
Sub-Topics Courts Law Enforcement
in committee · Washington · House Jan 16, 2026

HB 2541: Concerning the standard used to evaluate the reasonableness of a peace officer's use of force.

HB 2541 establishes an objective standard for evaluating police use of force, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's *Graham v. Connor* ruling. It clarifies when officers may use physical force (e.g., during arrests or to prevent escape) or deadly force (only for immediate threats of death or serious injury), requiring de-escalation tactics and consideration of vulnerable individuals like pregnant people, minors, or those with disabilities. The bill mandates that force decisions be judged by whether a reasonable officer in similar circumstances would act the same, without regard to the officer’s intent. It directly affects all peace officers in Washington and the public they interact with during enforcement actions. The law codifies existing guidance to address implementation challenges while preserving constitutional rights.
in committee · Washington · House Jan 23, 2026

HB 2651: Gathering and preserving digital data and evidence relating to federal agent misconduct.

HB 2651 allows Washington's Attorney General or county prosecutors to direct the state patrol to collect and securely retain digital evidence identifying federal agents accused of misconduct, such as location data, cell tower records, or facial recognition information. It applies to federal law enforcement officers and Department of Homeland Security contractors accused of misconduct like excessive force, assault, or constitutional rights violations. Complainants can only access this digital evidence through a court order in a related civil rights or criminal case. The bill establishes a clear process for gathering and limiting access to this data, focusing on factual evidence for accountability.
signed · Washington · Senate Apr 1, 2026

SB 5974: Modernizing and strengthening laws concerning sheriffs, police chiefs, town marshals, law enforcement agency volunteers, youth cadets, specially commissioned officers, and police matrons.

SB 5974 updates eligibility requirements and responsibilities for sheriffs, police chiefs, and town marshals in Washington State, requiring a minimum age of 25, high school diplomas, updated background checks, and prohibitions on certain misconduct. It clarifies that all law enforcement leaders must uphold both U.S. and Washington state constitutions, and specifies that revoked certifications must trigger removal from office. The bill also restricts volunteers and youth cadets to non-enforcement roles (like administrative support or community outreach), mandates clear policies for their supervision, and prohibits them from using force or wearing officer-like uniforms. Finally, it repeals outdated 1894 provisions regarding "police matrons" and modernizes accountability standards for all local law enforcement leadership.
signed · Washington · House Mar 19, 2026

HB 2165: Concerning false identification as a peace officer.

HB 2165 makes it a gross misdemeanor to intentionally create, possess, or display fake law enforcement items (like badges, vehicle decals, or insignia) that falsely identify someone as a sworn peace officer or reserve officer, or to misrepresent ordinary items as police property. It directly affects individuals or businesses selling or using fake police gear, such as costume shops or people posing as officers. Key exceptions include items clearly marked as honorary roles, historical displays, or protected artistic/satirical works (like parodies or educational materials). The law does not prohibit legitimate uses like historical reenactments or news coverage, and it specifies that the fake item must be displayed in a way that would reasonably mislead others.
in committee · Washington · House Jan 22, 2026

HB 2173: Concerning the use of face coverings by law enforcement officers.

HB 2173 prohibits Washington law enforcement officers from wearing facial coverings (like balaclavas or ski masks) during routine public interactions, while allowing exceptions for active undercover operations and protective gear used by specialized units like SWAT teams. The bill defines "facial covering" to exclude medical masks, helmets, and clear face shields. It also establishes that individuals detained in violation can sue officers for financial compensation, attorney fees, or other court-ordered remedies. The law applies to all "peace officers" as defined under state law during standard public duties.
Sub-Topics Courts Law Enforcement
signed · Washington · Senate Mar 18, 2026

SB 5880: Concerning toxicology testing by certified or accredited laboratories.

SB 5880 requires that toxicology testing for alcohol or drugs in DUI cases must be conducted by laboratories certified under international ISO/IEC 17025 standards for forensic testing, directly affecting drivers facing DUI charges and law enforcement. It specifies strict protocols for admissibility in court, including detailed requirements for breath test equipment calibration, sample collection procedures, and blood draw qualifications (limited to specific licensed medical professionals). The bill also mandates that any additional tests requested by the accused must use generally accepted methods, while maintaining that basic proof of proper testing procedures must be shown for results to be admitted. The law includes an expiration date and applies to both blood and breath testing under Washington’s DUI statutes.
Sub-Topics Courts Law Enforcement
Showing 11 to 20 of 72 bills
Previous 1 2 3 8 Next