Del. Holly Seibold

Maddy summaryThis bill formally commends Brad Hughes, a specific individual, for unspecified contributions or achievements. It does not create new laws, allocate funds, or change existing policies, as it is a purely ceremonial resolution. The measure was passed by both the House and Senate through voice votes and serves as an official recognition rather than a legislative action with enforceable provisions.

Maddy summaryThis bill formally recognizes the SevaTruck Foundation through a commendation resolution. It does not create new laws or change existing policies, but rather serves as an official acknowledgment of the organization's work. The legislation was passed by both the House and Senate without amendments. No funding, regulations, or operational changes are included in this measure.

Maddy summaryThis is a ceremonial resolution (HJ 185) honoring Jane Pasolli Edmondson, recognizing her contributions to the community. It does not create new laws or affect any policies, programs, or individuals through legislative action. The resolution passed both chambers of the legislature in March 2026 as a formal tribute. It serves solely to commemorate her life and legacy without any substantive policy impact.

Maddy summaryThis resolution (HJ 182) honors the life and contributions of Jane Kamps Strauss through a formal legislative expression of respect. It does not create any new laws, policies, or obligations, nor does it affect any individuals or groups beyond the ceremonial recognition. The measure passed unanimously in both the House and Senate in March 2026, as documented in its legislative actions. It is a standard commemorative resolution with no substantive policy impact.

Maddy summaryHJ 128 is a commemorative resolution honoring Claudia Hantman Arko, recognizing her life and contributions. It does not create new policies or affect any individuals or groups through legislative action. The bill simply expresses the legislature's collective tribute through a formal resolution. As a procedural measure, it has no binding effect or practical impact beyond the symbolic gesture.

Maddy summaryHJ 165 is a ceremonial resolution honoring Lieutenant Colonel Richard Thomas Bulova of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). It formally recognizes his service and life through a legislative expression of respect. This resolution directly affects no individuals or policies, as it has no legal effect beyond the symbolic act of commemoration. The bill passed both the House and Senate in early March 2026 as a non-binding gesture of tribute.

Maddy summaryHJ 153 is a ceremonial resolution passed by both the House and Senate in February 2026 to honor the life of Sincere B. Allah. It does not create any new laws or affect policy, as it is a symbolic gesture without legislative substance. The resolution simply expresses recognition and tribute to the individual, with no concrete policy changes or affected parties. Such resolutions are common for commemorating individuals' contributions and are typically non-binding.

Maddy summaryHJ 131 is a ceremonial resolution commending the Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn for his service. It does not create any new laws or affect policies, as it is a formal expression of recognition. The resolution passed unanimously in both the House (by voice vote) and Senate (by voice vote) in February 2026. This type of resolution honors individuals without implementing substantive changes.

Maddy summaryHJ 177 is a ceremonial resolution honoring the late Honorable Barry D. Knight, a former state official. It has no policy provisions or direct impact on constituents, as it solely commemorates his life and service. The resolution was unanimously adopted by the Senate on February 26, 2026, following standard procedural steps for commemorative measures. This type of resolution does not create law or affect any legal rights or obligations.

State correctional facilities; visitation policies; report. Requires the Department of Corrections to establish and publicly post on its website and in the lobby of each state correctional facility an objective dress code for individuals visiting a state correctional facility and specifies certain requirements for and limitations on what such dress code may include. The bill prohibits any state correctional facility from enforcing a dress code that is more restrictive than the dress code posted by the Department.The bill also prohibits any individual from being denied in-person visitation unless such individual is in clear violation of visitation rules or policies. Prior to denying entry to a visitor, the bill requires the reasoning to be (i) reviewed in person by the facility administrative duty officer and (ii) approved by a regional administrator or superior. The bill requires the Department to submit a report annually on or before November 1 to the General Assembly and the Governor with information on visitors denied entry to state correctional facilities, including the following information disaggregated by facility and by month: (a) the number of visitors denied entry and (b) the reasoning for such denials, including the specific rules or policies such visitors were alleged to have violated.The bill requires the Department to convene a work group consisting of relevant stakeholders to consider goals and develop practical policy and legislative recommendations related to facilitating visitation within state correctional facilities and report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly no later than November 1, 2026.