SB 243 amends tax increment financing rules for public transit-oriented developments in designated counties. It limits new projects to a 1/3-mile radius of transit hubs, restricts total project area to 125 noncontiguous acres, and caps the capture of property tax increases at 50% (not 80%) over a 15-year period per parcel. These changes apply specifically to projects approved under the bill's framework within a 30-year overall timeline. The bill is currently pending in the Senate Rules Committee after committee recommendations failed.
HB 485 limits how much revenue school districts and other local taxing entities can collect from new property value growth (e.g., increases in property values beyond the base assessment). It caps this revenue at the lesser of two amounts: (1) new growth multiplied by a set tax rate, or (2) an inflation-adjusted budget increase. This change affects school districts' ability to raise funds from new property values and adjusts how state contributions to basic school programs are calculated. The bill makes technical updates to property tax laws without appropriating new state funds, effective January 1, 2027.
HB 523 prohibits Utah's Office of Homeless Services from using state funds to establish or operate shelters with 300 or more beds year-round (defined as "large-scale, low-barrier shelters"), excluding temporary emergency shelters. It repeals a law allowing eminent domain for unincorporated city-owned land related to homeless services and makes technical updates to existing statutes. The bill does not appropriate new funding and specifically restricts state appropriations, not federal funds. It affects how state money can be allocated for homeless shelter infrastructure but does not change services for temporary shelters or existing homeless management systems.
HB 449 would require Utah voters to approve most increases in state or local government taxes or debt, as well as any spending above a set limit in a fiscal year. It also eliminates automatic tax increases and mandates refunds of excess revenue collected beyond approved spending limits. These changes would apply to all state and local government entities and require voter approval of a constitutional amendment before taking effect. The bill does not appropriate new funds and is contingent on passage of the proposed constitutional amendment.
HB 484 limits how much additional property tax revenue Utah school districts and local taxing entities can collect without voter approval, capping increases at 20% of their previous year's revenue. It requires voter approval for tax hikes exceeding this limit and eliminates a protection period that previously shielded school districts from losing state funding when lowering tax rates. The bill also phases out excess state funding over three years if a school district reduces its certified tax rate, ensuring funding aligns with current property valuations. This directly affects school districts' budgets and local tax collection processes under Utah law.
HJR 20 proposes a constitutional amendment to require voter approval for most tax increases and government debt in Utah. If passed, it would mandate that taxpayers vote to approve any rise in tax revenue or new borrowing by state or local governments, limit annual spending without voter consent, and require refunds of excess tax revenue. The amendment also specifies that residential property must be assessed using sales comparison (standard home valuation method) and allows the legislature to exempt business personal property from taxes. This change would affect all Utah taxpayers and government entities by shifting key budgetary decisions to voter approval.
HB 507 establishes a State Reinvestment Restricted Account to collect and manage funds from specific economic development activities. It prohibits local governments from offering incentives for large data centers (with exceptions), creates new development zones for housing, transit, and other projects, and requires counties/cities to follow specific rules for zone creation and funding. The bill sets a 2028 deadline for creating certain zones like home ownership promotion areas and coordinates with another economic development bill (H.B. 475). It affects local governments, counties, cities, and the Utah Inland Port Authority by modifying how they manage economic development projects and tax increment funds.
HB 425 restricts how Utah cities and towns can charge certain fees. It bars cities from imposing general fees for broadband internet or public safety services (like police/fire) on the public, with limited exceptions (e.g., fees for bonds issued before 2026 must end by 2027). Similarly, towns cannot charge general fees for public safety services, except for existing fees tied to agreements between towns or volunteer services, which must be renewed every three years. The bill also creates a new process for municipalities to establish transportation utility fees (for services like roads), requiring annual reviews, appeal mechanisms, and local referendums for new fees.
HB 267 limits annual salary increases for school district administrators (including superintendents, business administrators, and deputies) to the weighted pupil unit (WPU) inflation rate, unless specific conditions are met. To exceed this cap, school boards must hold a public hearing, tie raises to measurable performance outcomes (like student literacy rates or graduation rates), and secure a majority vote. The bill also restricts certain benefits and sets new pay scales for deputy administrators and new superintendents. It directly affects school district leadership compensation decisions across Utah, with no new state funding required.
SB 231 modifies Utah's property tax system for large energy users (facilities with 100+ megawatts of cumulative electricity demand). It prohibits new tax increment financing agreements (a tool for funding development projects) for projects containing such "large load customers" after May 6, 2026, affecting cities, counties, and special districts. The bill also requires large load customers to notify county auditors and treasurers of their location. These changes adjust how tax revenue is distributed and restrict development funding for major energy consumers.
