Sen. Marsha Blackburn

Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 7) seeks congressional disapproval of a 2023 rule defining "Waters of the United States" (WOTUS), which would have changed how federal agencies regulate wetlands and waterways. It targets a rule jointly issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, and other agencies (88 Fed. Reg. 3004, Jan. 18, 2023), directly affecting landowners, developers, and environmental regulators by altering jurisdiction over water resources. If passed, the resolution would nullify the rule under a specific disapproval process in Title 5 of U.S. Code, preventing it from taking effect. The resolution does not create new regulations but aims to block an existing federal rule. This is a procedural step, not a new law.

Maddy summaryThis proposed constitutional amendment (SJRES 13) would require the federal government to balance its annual budget, meaning spending could not exceed revenue unless Congress passes a specific exception with a two-thirds vote. It also sets a limit of 18% of GDP for total government spending, with similar supermajority requirements to exceed this cap. The bill would mandate the President to submit a balanced budget proposal to Congress each year and require a two-thirds vote for tax increases or debt limit hikes. As a proposed amendment, it would only take effect if ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures.

Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 12) seeks congressional disapproval of the District of Columbia Council’s approval of the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-789). It directly affects D.C. residents and local government, as the resolution targets the District’s newly enacted criminal code. The mechanism is a formal congressional disapproval under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, requiring passage by both chambers to block the D.C. law from taking effect. The resolution does not alter the D.C. code itself but aims to halt its implementation through federal action.

Maddy summaryS 327 would reduce funding by 5% for all non-defense, non-homeland-security, and non-veterans-affairs federal programs in fiscal years 2024 and 2025. This applies to all discretionary spending accounts outside defense, homeland security, and veterans affairs, including programs like education, environmental protection, and scientific research. The bill mandates a proportional cut across all affected accounts and requires the Office of Management and Budget to report the specific reductions to Congress within 30 days. It directly impacts agencies and programs funded through non-exempt discretionary appropriations.

Maddy summaryThis bill (S 330) reduces non-defense, non-homeland-security, and non-veterans-affairs federal spending by 2% for fiscal years 2024 and 2025. It directly affects programs outside defense, homeland security, and veterans affairs, such as education, environmental protection, and scientific research. The 2% cut applies proportionally across all eligible discretionary accounts and their programs, as defined in annual spending bills. The Office of Management and Budget must report the specific accounts and amounts affected within 30 days of enactment.

Maddy summaryThis bill (S 331) reduces non-defense, non-homeland-security, and non-veterans-affairs federal spending by 1% for fiscal years 2024 and 2025. It applies to all discretionary government programs outside those three categories - such as education, transportation, and environmental initiatives - cutting funds proportionally across each program. The Office of Management and Budget must report the specific accounts and amounts affected to Congress within 30 days. This policy change directly impacts non-excluded federal programs but excludes military, border security, and veterans services funding.

Maddy summaryThis bill expands U.S. immigration restrictions by adding new grounds for denying entry to non-citizens. It makes individuals inadmissible if a consular officer or DHS believes they engaged in, or plan to engage in, activities like espionage, sabotage, violating U.S. export laws for sensitive goods/technology, unlawful activities, or efforts to overthrow the U.S. government by force. It also bars entry for spouses or children of individuals deemed inadmissible under these new rules if the qualifying activity occurred within the last five years. The law directly affects people seeking visas or entry into the United States based on these specific security-related activities.

Maddy summaryS 347, the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act, would prohibit U.S. transactions with social media companies deemed to be controlled by "countries of concern" like China, Russia, or Iran. It specifically targets companies meeting criteria such as being based in those countries, having significant foreign ownership, or being subject to foreign influence over data sharing or content moderation - directly affecting platforms like TikTok and its parent company Bytedance. The bill authorizes the President to block all U.S. financial transactions with these companies under existing economic sanctions law (IEPA), effectively preventing their commercial operations in the U.S. market. Exemptions cover intelligence activities and physical goods imports, but the core provision would require immediate action against covered social media firms upon enactment.

Maddy summaryThis bill amends federal murder law to treat distributing fentanyl that causes death as felony murder. It specifically targets individuals who distribute fentanyl (2+ grams of a mixture containing fentanyl, or 0.5+ grams of its analogues) knowing it contains the substance and causing death. The law adds a new provision stating that distributing fentanyl resulting in death constitutes first-degree murder, punishable by death or life imprisonment. This directly affects fentanyl distributors whose actions lead to fatalities, with the penalty applying when the distributor knew or should have known the substance contained fentanyl or its analogues.

Maddy summaryThis bill allows veterans with combat-related disabilities and less than 20 years of service to receive both military retired pay and VA disability compensation simultaneously. Previously, such veterans had their retired pay reduced to avoid "concurrent receipt" of both benefits. The bill removes the 20-year service requirement for this group, applying specifically to those retired under Chapter 61 of Title 10 with a combat-related disability as defined in existing law. It does not change eligibility for veterans with non-combat disabilities or those with 20+ years of service.