Rep. Jake Ellzey

Maddy summaryHR 520 allows law enforcement agencies to use Byrne JAG funds for programs specifically targeting the demand behind sex trafficking, such as initiatives aimed at reducing the market for commercial sex acts involving trafficked individuals. This bill amends existing federal funding rules to explicitly authorize these funds for "programs to combat human trafficking (including programs to reduce the demand for trafficked persons)." It directly affects state and local law enforcement agencies that receive Byrne JAG grants by expanding how they can allocate those resources. The key change is creating a dedicated funding category for demand reduction efforts, moving beyond solely supporting victim services or investigations.

Maddy summaryHR 524, the "NO GOTION Act," blocks U.S. green energy tax credits for companies tied to specific countries. It amends tax law to deny benefits under sections like 30C, 45, and 48 to any "disqualified company" - defined as entities created in, controlled by, or linked to China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea. The law directly affects corporations with ties to these nations that seek federal tax incentives for clean energy projects. The policy takes effect for tax years after the bill's enactment, removing eligibility for these companies without altering other tax rules.

Maddy summaryHRES 47 is a House resolution calling on the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to revoke its current policy allowing biological males who identify as transgender to compete on women's sports teams. The resolution states this policy discriminates against female athletes and violates Title IX by jeopardizing women's competitive opportunities and safety. It specifically urges the NCAA to implement a biological sex-based policy, requiring only individuals assigned female at birth to compete in women's sports, and to ensure all member conferences comply. The resolution does not create new law but formally requests the NCAA change its eligibility rules.

Maddy summaryHR 418 requires federal agencies to have rules created under standard rulemaking procedures signed by a Senate-confirmed appointee or initiated by a senior agency official. This affects all agencies developing regulations, mandating that such rules follow specific leadership approval steps unless the agency head certifies public safety or security concerns require an exception. Agencies seeking to bypass this requirement must submit written justification to OIRA (Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs) and publish it in the Federal Register. OIRA will monitor compliance with these procedural requirements, which change the process for rulemaking without altering the substance of regulations.

Maddy summaryHR 445, the Border Security Investment Act, creates two new trust funds to fund border security by imposing a 37% fee on money transfers sent to the top 5 countries with the most unlawful border entries in the previous year. Money transfer companies pay this fee, with half the collected funds going to a Reimbursement Fund to reimburse border states for their security costs and the other half to a Security Fund for federal border technology, barriers, and Border Patrol staffing. The bill requires the Treasury to transfer these funds annually, sets a $50 billion cap on total fund balances (with excess funds directed to deficit reduction), and takes effect 30 days after enactment. It directly affects money transfer providers, border states, and federal border security operations.

Maddy summaryHR 424, the State Border Security Reimbursement Act of 2025, requires the federal government to reimburse states that spent over $2.5 billion on border security since 2014. It directly affects states like Texas, which has allocated over $3.2 billion for border security since 2008-2009 due to federal inaction. States meeting the spending threshold must submit expense reports within 180 days of the bill's enactment, and the federal government must reimburse these costs within one year of submission. The bill aims to address the financial burden on states that have funded border security efforts primarily the federal government's responsibility.

Maddy summaryHR 28, the *Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025*, amends Title IX to prohibit federally funded schools from allowing male-identified individuals (based on biological sex at birth) to compete on women’s or girls’ sports teams. It explicitly states that such participation would violate federal civil rights law, with exceptions only for training/practice that doesn’t displace female athletes from roster spots, competitions, scholarships, or other benefits. The bill mandates a Comptroller General study to define "other benefits" lost by girls when males compete in single-sex sports, including impacts on psychological well-being, scholarship access, and safe participation environments. This bill directly affects all athletic programs receiving federal funding, requiring compliance with its biological-sex-based eligibility rules.

Maddy summaryHR 377, the Regulation Reduction Act of 2025, requires federal agencies to repeal three existing rules before issuing new ones that impose costs or responsibilities on businesses, state/local governments, or individuals. For major new rules, agencies must also certify that the new rule’s cost does not exceed the cost of the repealed rules. Agencies must publish all repealed rules in the Federal Register and submit a 90-day review to Congress identifying costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated regulations. This bill directly affects how federal agencies develop new rules, aiming to reduce regulatory burden by mandating rule removal before new rule creation.

Maddy summaryHR 342, the Honor Inauguration Day Act, requires the U.S. flag to be flown at its highest peak on every presidential Inauguration Day, overriding any conflicting laws. This procedural bill directly affects all federal buildings and properties where the flag is displayed on that specific day. It mandates a ceremonial flag display to "commemorate and celebrate" the presidential election process, as stated in the congressional findings. The bill makes no substantive policy changes but establishes a specific flag protocol for Inauguration Day.

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits federal funding under Title X (which supports family planning services) for clinics or organizations that perform or fund abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or when a physician certifies a life-threatening condition. It requires grantees to certify compliance annually and mandates detailed annual reports to Congress on exceptions, including abortion counts by circumstance. The law directly affects Title X-funded providers who currently offer abortion services, potentially forcing them to stop providing abortions or lose federal funding. Key mechanisms include the certification requirement, exception criteria, and the new reporting obligations for the Secretary of Health and Human Services.