Photo of Dina Titus
D United States House · District 1 · Nevada On the 2026 ballot

Rep. Dina Titus

Compare
Total votes
2,837
all sessions
Attendance
96%
119 missed
Lower than 92% of chamber peers
With party
97%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
2,683
bills & resolutions
Higher than 97% of chamber peers
Committees
8
assignments
2,683 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,683
Primary
132
Co-sponsor
2,551
This page
2,683
matching current filters
Co-sponsor HR 1892
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging Grant Program Act of 2025

Maddy summaryHR 1892 establishes a federal grant program to fund wireless electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure across the U.S. The program, authorized with $250 million, provides competitive grants (capped at $25 million per project) to states, transit agencies, and other eligible entities to build or improve wireless charging systems for vehicles - prioritizing fleets (like buses and trucks), underserved communities, and projects that reduce range anxiety. Grants cover up to 80% of project costs, require adherence to Davis-Bacon wage standards, and mandate Buy America rules for equipment. This directly affects local governments and transit providers implementing EV charging networks while aiming to expand EV adoption through accessible, grid-friendly infrastructure.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 1880
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Broadcast Freedom and Independence Act of 2025

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from taking action against broadcasters - such as revoking licenses - based on the viewpoints they broadcast or the content they disseminate. It also bans the FCC from imposing viewpoint-related conditions when reviewing transactions like license transfers. The law explicitly preserves the FCC’s authority to act against illegal content (such as incitement, hate speech, or threats under existing federal law) but prevents political pressure from influencing regulatory decisions. It directly affects broadcasters and the FCC’s enforcement practices under the Communications Act of 1934.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 1890
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Turkey Diplomatic Realignment Act

Maddy summaryHR 1890, the Turkey Diplomatic Realignment Act, directs the U.S. State Department to move responsibility for Turkey from the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs to the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs within 90 days of enactment. This reassignment aims to better align U.S. diplomatic strategy with Turkey’s geographic and regional engagement, particularly given its shifting foreign policy toward non-Western partners and reduced ties with NATO/Europe. The bill requires a report to Congress within five years evaluating the reassignment’s effectiveness and suggesting further adjustments. It does not alter U.S. policy toward Turkey but changes how the State Department organizes its diplomatic focus for the country.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 1877
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Protecting Americans’ Social Security Data Act

Protecting Americans’ Social Security Data Act This bill prohibits political appointees and special government employees from accessing Social Security data systems that contain personally identifiable information about Social Security beneficiaries. Specifically, political appointees and special government employees may not access systems maintained by the Social Security Administration (SSA) that issue or record Social Security account numbers, that are used to determine eligibility for or to pay Social Security benefits, or that otherwise contain personally identifiable information about individuals receiving or applying for benefits.  The bill also establishes a civil right of action for an individual whose information was negligently accessed or disclosed in violation of these provisions. The individual may bring suit against the United States if the violator was a U.S. employee or officer, or against the violator if they were not a U.S. employee or officer. Such a claim must be brought within two years of the affected individual’s discovery of the violation. Upon a finding of liability, defendants are liable for specified monetary damages.  If an individual is criminally charged or subject to proposed disciplinary or adverse action by a federal or state agency for having accessed or disclosed information in violation of these provisions, SSA must notify the individual whose information was accessed or disclosed of the violation as soon as practicable.  Finally, the bill requires the SSA Office of the Inspector General to investigate and report to Congress on any unauthorized access to or disclosure of information in a beneficiary data system.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 1876
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Keeping Our Field Offices Open Act

Maddy summaryHR 1876, the "Keeping Our Field Offices Open Act," prevents the Social Security Administration (SSA) from closing, consolidating, or restricting access to its field offices, hearing offices, or resident stations for 180 days after enactment, with exceptions for emergencies. The bill requires the SSA Commissioner to submit a detailed report to Congress by January 2029, analyzing closure criteria, transportation burdens for elderly/disabled users, cost-benefit impacts, and plans to replace lost services. For future closures, it mandates 120 days of public notice, two public hearings, and a final report to Congress, while ensuring total office numbers don’t fall below 2025 levels. This directly affects SSA field offices, their users (including elderly and disabled individuals), and employees. The bill’s key mechanism is a procedural safeguard to ensure transparency and minimize disruption before any office changes take effect.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 14
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025

Maddy summaryThis bill strengthens the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by clarifying how to prove voting discrimination and expanding requirements for preclearance of voting changes. It establishes new standards for determining when voting practices dilute minority voting strength or deny/abridge voting rights, requiring plaintiffs to show specific conditions for vote dilution claims and including factors like historical discrimination and racial polarization in court analyses. The bill modifies the criteria for determining which states and political subdivisions must seek preclearance for voting changes, and adds new transparency requirements for jurisdictions to publicly disclose changes to voting qualifications, polling locations, and election districts. It directly affects states and local governments that implement voting policies, particularly those with a history of voting rights violations or that make changes to voting qualifications, procedures, or district boundaries. The bill aims to prevent discriminatory voting practices by providing clearer standards for courts and requiring greater transparency in voting rule changes.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 20
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025

Maddy summaryThe Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025 strengthens workers' organizing rights by making it an unfair labor practice for employers to threaten permanent replacement of striking workers, discriminate against workers who support unions, or require employees to attend employer campaigns unrelated to their job duties. It expands the definition of "employee" to make it harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors and requires employers to post notices about workers' rights in conspicuous locations. The bill establishes a new electronic voting system for union elections, creates a 90-day bargaining period before mediation can be requested, and increases penalties for violations of labor laws. These changes are intended to make it easier for workers to form unions and negotiate better wages and working conditions.

In committee Mar 5, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HRES 188
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Affirming the obligation of the President of the United States to comply with court orders.

Maddy summaryHRES 188 is a resolution affirming the President's constitutional duty to comply with court orders, as established by landmark cases like *Marbury v. Madison* and *Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer*. It specifically calls on President Trump and his administration to adhere to recent court rulings blocking executive actions, such as those related to citizenship eligibility, federal funding freezes, and access to government payment systems. The resolution serves as a formal statement of the House's position on the separation of powers without creating new legal requirements or altering existing law.

In committee Mar 4, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 1841
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Peace on the Korean Peninsula Act

Maddy summaryThis bill directs the State Department to review restrictions on U.S. citizens traveling to North Korea, particularly focusing on humanitarian visits for Americans with relatives there (estimated at 100,000 people). It requires the Secretary of State to submit a report within 180 days detailing how the U.S. will pursue a formal end to the Korean War through diplomatic negotiations with North and South Korea. The bill also mandates a separate report outlining a clear roadmap for achieving a binding peace agreement, including necessary negotiation steps and key stakeholders. These provisions aim to address the ongoing state of war, which the bill states prevents formal U.S.-North Korea relations and family reunifications.

In committee Mar 4, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 1835
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
MERIT Act

Maddy summaryHR 1835 (MERIT Act) provides reinstatement or compensation to federal employees who were terminated during a specific mass layoff period (January 20, 2025, through the bill’s enactment date). Affected probationary employees - newly hired workers on a trial period or not yet permanent - can choose to return to a similar position with matching benefits or receive a lump-sum payment covering the pay difference between their terminated role and any new federal job they held during the layoff period. Agencies must notify affected employees within 30 days and offer reinstatement or payment within 90 days, with employees required to accept or decline within 30 days to avoid losing eligibility. The bill defines "mass termination" as 15+ separations in a 30-day period by a single agency.

In committee Mar 4, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Showing 651 to 660 of 2,683 bills
Previous 1 … 65 66 67 … 269 Next