Maddy summaryHR 7833, the "Nuclear Family Priority Act," changes U.S. immigration policy by excluding parents from the definition of "immediate relatives" for family-based visas, meaning parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents no longer qualify for expedited processing. It establishes a new nonimmigrant category (Section 101(a)(15)(W)) for parents of adult U.S. citizens (21+ years old), allowing 5-year stays with no work authorization, no public benefits, and requiring proof of health insurance and financial support from the U.S. citizen child. The bill also reduces the worldwide family-sponsored visa cap from 226,000 to 88,000 (minus a calculation) and reallocates 75% of visas without country limits. These changes directly affect parents of adult U.S. citizens seeking to immigrate and alter the visa allocation system for family-sponsored immigration.
Rep. Victoria Spartz
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill establishes new eligibility rules for women's and girls' amateur sports by defining "female" and "male" based on biological sex at birth. It prohibits individuals designated as male under these definitions from participating in athletic competitions designated for females, women, or girls. The law amends existing U.S. Code provisions to add this requirement, directly affecting athletes and organizations managing female-designated teams. The key change is a clear ban on male-identified participants in female sports, replacing previous eligibility standards with biological sex criteria.
Maddy summaryThis bill requires public companies to disclose annual reports on financial risks tied to China and related regions. It mandates companies to describe their supply chain dependencies in covered markets (including mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea), their operations there, and any material risks linked to Chinese government actions. Companies must detail steps taken to mitigate these risks, but are not required to predict risk likelihood or provide third-party assessments. The disclosure rules apply to all issuers filing annual reports under securities law, effective 180 days after enactment.
No Capital Gains Allowance for American Adversaries Act This bill treats gains and dividends derived from transactions involving countries of concern as ordinary income. The bill defines countries of concern to include China (including Hong Kong and Macao and excluding Taiwan), Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea.
No China in Index Funds Act This bill prohibits index funds from investing in Chinese companies. Index funds with investments in Chinese companies on the date of enactment have 180 days to divest. The bill establishes civil penalties for violations.
Maddy summaryHR 7759, the PRC Military and Human Rights Capital Markets Sanctions Act of 2024, prohibits U.S. persons from purchasing, selling, or holding securities of specific Chinese entities linked to military activities, human rights abuses, or forced labor. The bill requires the President to compile and publicly list these "covered entities" within 90 days, including entities on Treasury’s Specially Designated Nationals list, the Non-SDN CMIC List, or Department of Defense military lists. U.S. persons must divest existing holdings of these securities within 180 days of the list’s publication. Violations face civil penalties up to $250,000 per transaction or criminal fines up to $1 million for willful breaches. The law directly affects U.S. investors, financial institutions, and companies holding securities in designated Chinese entities.
Maddy summaryThis resolution (HRES 149) is a symbolic congressional statement condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine, specifically the forcible transfer and abduction of Ukrainian children. It directly addresses the Russian government, citing evidence including Ukrainian reports of over 2,300 children kidnapped and Russia's policy granting citizenship to children born in occupied territories after February 24, 2022. The resolution formally declares these actions violate the Genocide Convention (Article II(e)) and claims Russia is attempting to erase Ukrainian identity by targeting children. As a non-binding resolution, it holds no legal force but expresses the House's official stance against these practices.
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits U.S. app stores, hosting services, and distributors from enabling foreign adversary-controlled applications (like TikTok, owned by ByteDance) to operate within U.S. borders. It requires companies to provide users with their data in a machine-readable format before a ban takes effect, and imposes civil penalties of up to $5,000 per affected user for violations. The law directly affects major app platforms, app stores, and internet hosting services, targeting applications owned by entities controlled by designated "foreign adversary" countries (e.g., China). It includes exemptions for companies that divest U.S. operations to non-adversary entities before the ban date.
Maddy summaryHR 7656, the Balanced Budget and Accounting Act, would require the President's annual federal budget to balance spending and revenue each fiscal year. It amends Section 1105(a) of Title 31, U.S. Code, to mandate that total government spending (outlays) cannot exceed total revenue (receipts) in any given year. This would directly affect how the executive branch prepares and submits federal budgets, imposing a binding constraint on annual budget planning. The bill creates a concrete rule for budget preparation, requiring the President to submit a balanced budget proposal without exception.
Maddy summaryThe Laken Riley Act (HR 7511) would require federal authorities to detain non-citizens charged with or convicted of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offenses. It also creates new legal standing for state attorneys general to sue federal immigration officials in federal court if they believe immigration enforcement decisions (like releasing aliens or granting parole) cause financial harm exceeding $100 to the state or its residents. The bill amends immigration laws to expand detention requirements for certain property crimes and allows states to seek court orders to enforce immigration policies. It does not create new criminal penalties but modifies existing immigration enforcement procedures. The bill’s findings and political language about the Laken Riley case are not part of its policy provisions.