Maddy summaryHR 393, the "No Repeat Child Sex Offenders Act," amends federal criminal code sections to replace existing prison terms with mandatory death or life imprisonment for specific child sex offenses. It applies to prosecutions under provisions targeting sex trafficking of children (18 U.S.C. §1591), transportation of minors for sexual purposes (18 U.S.C. §2423), and various sexual abuse crimes against minors (18 U.S.C. §§2241-2245). The bill directly affects individuals convicted under these provisions, including repeat offenders, by eliminating minimum and maximum prison sentences in favor of the harshest penalties. It does not create new offenses but significantly increases penalties for existing crimes involving child sexual exploitation.
Rep. Mary E. Miller
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryHR 394, the "Holding Child Predators Accountable Act," amends federal laws to impose mandatory death or life imprisonment for certain child pornography offenses. It changes penalties under Title 18 for possession (Section 1466A), exploitation (Section 2252), and distribution (Section 2252A) of child sexual abuse material, replacing prior penalty structures with the maximum sentence. This directly affects individuals convicted of violating these specific provisions, including those involving possession, distribution, or production of such material. The bill makes no new offenses but mandates the harshest possible penalties for existing violations under these sections.
Maddy summaryHCONRES 3 is a symbolic congressional resolution expressing support for the Geneva Consensus Declaration, an international agreement signed by 39 countries that affirms women’s health, family protection, and opposes international abortion rights. It urges the U.S. to rejoin the declaration, which emphasizes that no country has an obligation to fund or facilitate abortion and that families are foundational to society. The resolution does not create new laws but reaffirms existing U.S. policies prohibiting federal funding for abortions or coercive family planning abroad. It directly affects U.S. foreign policy direction but has no binding effect on government actions.
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits federal funding under Title X (which supports family planning services) for clinics or organizations that perform or fund abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or when a physician certifies a life-threatening condition. It requires grantees to certify compliance annually and mandates detailed annual reports to Congress on exceptions, including abortion counts by circumstance. The law directly affects Title X-funded providers who currently offer abortion services, potentially forcing them to stop providing abortions or lose federal funding. Key mechanisms include the certification requirement, exception criteria, and the new reporting obligations for the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Maddy summaryHRES 25 is a resolution to erase the January 13, 2021, impeachment of President Donald Trump from the U.S. House of Representatives' official records, as if it never occurred. It argues the impeachment process was flawed due to lack of due process, omission of context about the 2020 election, and constitutional concerns like ignoring the Senate trial timeline. The resolution does not change the Senate's prior acquittal of Trump but seeks to remove the House's vote from its internal documentation. As a procedural resolution, it would only affect the House's records and has no legal impact on the impeachment's outcome.
Maddy summaryThis House resolution (HRES 26) declares that conduct by Antifa members at affiliated demonstrations is domestic terrorism under existing law (18 U.S.C. §2331) and designates Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. It calls on the Department of Justice to prosecute Antifa-related terrorism and use available resources to combat such activity. The resolution does not create new law but formally characterizes Antifa’s actions as terrorism for congressional purposes. It directly affects Antifa members and affiliates by framing their conduct under federal terrorism definitions.
Maddy summaryHRES 24 is a resolution seeking to remove the December 18, 2019, impeachment of President Donald Trump from the House of Representatives' official records. It claims the impeachment was based on insufficient evidence that did not meet the constitutional standard for impeachment under Article II, Section 4. If passed, the resolution would treat the impeachment as if it never occurred, erasing it from the House's historical record. This is a procedural measure affecting only the House's internal documentation, not legal outcomes or the Senate trial.
Maddy summaryHR 272, the Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2025, prohibits federal funding (directly or indirectly) to any organization that performs or funds abortions, requiring certification from all recipients. This applies to entities receiving federal funds, including contractors and subsidiaries, with limited exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, or when a physician certifies a life-threatening condition. The bill directly affects healthcare providers, clinics, and organizations that rely on federal grants or contracts. It changes existing funding rules by banning federal money from supporting abortion services, except in the specified medical or criminal exceptions.
Maddy summaryThis bill grants the Secretary of Homeland Security authority to temporarily suspend entry of certain individuals at U.S. borders to achieve "operational control" (defined as effective border management). It specifically applies to people seeking entry without proper documentation who would be denied entry under current law (e.g., lacking visas or asylum eligibility). The Secretary must block entry if they cannot detain or process these individuals as required by existing immigration law. States may also sue the government if they believe border security rules are violated.
Maddy summaryThis bill directs the Department of Homeland Security to implement the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) as outlined in a 2019 policy memo. It requires migrants seeking asylum at the U.S. border to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed, rather than being allowed to stay in the U.S. pending a hearing. The bill does not create new rules but mandates the reinstatement of a policy that was previously in effect from 2019 to 2021. This would directly affect asylum seekers arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border. The policy change would apply to all migrants covered by the existing MPP framework.