Issue · Energy

Energy

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in United States, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
119th Congress
Top supporter
Martin Heinrich
75% support rate
Top opponent
Marsha Blackburn
26% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving energy in United States

Legislators moving energy in United States
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Martin Heinrich
Martin Heinrich Senate
D
Support
75% 194
John W. Hickenlooper
John W. Hickenlooper Senate
D
Support
74% 212
Brendan F. Boyle
Brendan F. Boyle House · District 2
D
Support
73% 253
Frederica S. Wilson
Frederica S. Wilson House · District 24
D
Support
73% 188
Jacky Rosen
Jacky Rosen Senate
D
Support
72% 213
Marsha Blackburn
Marsha Blackburn Senate
R
Oppose
26% 186
Ted Budd
Ted Budd Senate
R
Oppose
27% 198
Chip Roy
Chip Roy House · District 21
R
Oppose
27% 251
Scott DesJarlais
Scott DesJarlais House · District 4
R
Oppose
29% 256
Mike Johnson
Mike Johnson House · District 4
R
Oppose
29% 194
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All energy bills

died · United States · Senate Jul 27, 2026

S 4784: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027

This bill authorizes funding and sets policy guidelines for the U.S. Department of Defense and Department of Energy for fiscal year 2027, directly affecting military personnel, defense contractors, and federal agencies. Key provisions include authorizing specific appropriations for procurement, research, operations, and military construction, while establishing end-strength limits for active and reserve forces across all military branches. The legislation also mandates various strategic plans and reports on topics such as Arctic readiness, supply chain resilience, artificial intelligence integration, and environmental remediation at military installations. Additionally, the bill modifies personnel policies regarding promotions, retirements, and service obligations, and includes restrictions on the use of certain foreign-made equipment and connected vehicles on military bases.
in committee · United States · Senate Jun 3, 2026

SJRES 188: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units: Final Repeal".

This joint resolution seeks to officially disapprove a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency regarding emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants. If passed, the measure would prevent the EPA's proposed repeal of existing national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants from taking effect. The legislation directly impacts the EPA and the electric utility industry by maintaining current regulatory requirements for these power generation units. It operates as a legislative veto, allowing Congress to reject a federal agency's rule without passing new laws.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SJRES 107: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Beginning of Construction Requirements for Purposes of the Termination of Clean Electricity Production Credits and Clean Electricity Investment Credits for Applicable Wind and Solar Facilities".

This bill (SJRES 107) seeks congressional disapproval of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rule that sets requirements for when construction must begin on wind and solar facilities to qualify for federal tax credits. The rule, IRS Notice 2025-42, would have determined how developers meet "beginning of construction" criteria to maintain eligibility for clean energy production and investment tax credits. If passed, this resolution would block the IRS rule from taking effect, directly affecting wind and solar project developers who rely on these tax credits. The bill does not create new policy but halts an existing regulatory requirement under federal law.