Maddy summaryHB 126 requires the Texas Attorney General to prosecute certain election-related criminal offenses if local prosecutors fail to act within six months. Specifically, if a law enforcement agency submits a report of an election crime to both a local prosecutor and the Attorney General, and the local prosecutor hasn't initiated charges within six months, the Attorney General must take over the case. This applies only to offenses committed on or after the bill's effective date (91 days after the legislative session ends), and affects election crime defendants, local prosecutors, and the Attorney General's office. The bill amends existing election and government codes to clarify this prosecution duty and allow the Attorney General to direct local prosecutors to assist.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryHB 91 would reduce school district property tax rates by using surplus state revenue to lower the "state compression percentage" that determines how much districts can charge for maintenance and operations. It directs the comptroller to allocate surplus state revenue into a property tax relief fund, which the commissioner can then use to further reduce this percentage. If the percentage reaches zero, school districts would be prohibited from imposing the lowest tier of property taxes and would automatically qualify for full state funding as if they had the maximum allowable tax rate. This bill directly affects all Texas public school districts by potentially lowering their local tax burdens and changing their funding structure.
Maddy summaryHB 167 restricts local governments (like cities, counties, and school districts) from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay nonprofits that lobby on their behalf. It prohibits spending taxpayer money to contract with registered lobbyists or support organizations representing local governments that employ lobbyists, though exceptions exist for direct communication by government employees or advocacy by elected officials. The bill allows reimbursement for travel expenses related to permitted activities and lets taxpayers sue to stop violations and recover legal fees. It directly affects how local governments allocate public funds for legislative advocacy efforts.
Maddy summaryHB 115 restricts Texas local governments (like cities and counties) from using public funds to hire lobbyists or pay organizations that hire lobbyists to influence state legislation. The bill specifically prohibits spending public money to contract with registered lobbyists or fund associations primarily representing local governments if those associations employ registered lobbyists, with exceptions for sheriffs' associations and certain staff activities. It allows local government employees to provide information to lawmakers, advocate for policies without registering as lobbyists, and cover direct travel expenses for such activities. Taxpayers or residents can sue to stop prohibited spending and recover legal fees if they win the case. The law aims to prevent public funds from being used to directly lobby the state legislature.
Maddy summaryHB 80 imposes civil liability on individuals or entities distributing abortion-inducing drugs and requires internet service providers to take specific actions related to such content. The bill creates a new criminal offense for violations and authorizes private individuals to file civil lawsuits for breaches of the law. This legislation directly affects distributors of abortion drugs, internet service providers, and those involved in civil litigation under the new provisions. Note: Specific details of the internet service provider duties and criminal offense are not provided in the available bill text.
Maddy summaryHB 95 establishes minimum training and certification standards for Emergency Management Coordinators in Texas counties with populations over 500,000. It requires these coordinators, appointed by Emergency Management Directors, to meet qualifications set by the Texas Division of Emergency Management. The bill directly affects county emergency management staff in larger jurisdictions who handle disaster response coordination. Key provisions mandate that coordinators' qualifications be defined through division rules, ensuring standardized emergency management capacity across qualifying counties.
Maddy summaryHJR 11 proposes a constitutional amendment that would limit annual spending growth for Texas state and local governments to the average taxpayer's ability to pay. Governments could exceed this limit only with a 3/4 vote in both legislative chambers for a declared emergency, and any over-collected tax revenue must be returned to taxpayers through reduced tax rates. The amendment requires voter approval in the November 2025 election to take effect, with no impact if rejected. This directly affects state/local budget decisions and taxpayer refunds, not legislative procedures or non-budgetary matters.
Maddy summaryHB 93 limits the rate at which state and local governments can increase spending by tying annual budget growth to population and inflation trends. It requires the Legislative Budget Board to calculate a spending growth cap each biennium using the prior three years' average population growth plus inflation (measured by the Consumer Price Index). If actual spending growth falls below this cap, the bill mandates reducing taxes to return over-collected revenue to taxpayers. This applies to all state/local government funding sources, including general revenue and dedicated accounts, and affects all Texas taxpayers through potential tax reductions.
Maddy summaryThis resolution urges Governor Greg Abbott to return federal reconciliation funds to Texas taxpayers by implementing property tax relief. The Texas House of Representatives passed this non-binding resolution to formally request the Governor use the funds for property tax cuts, directing the chief clerk to forward a copy to the Governor's office. It does not require legal action or change existing tax policy, as resolutions like this serve only as a formal expression of legislative opinion.
Maddy summaryHB 162 prohibits political subdivisions (like cities or counties) from using eminent domain to acquire property outside their own boundaries. The bill adds a new provision (Section 2206.003) to the Government Code stating that political subdivisions "may not take through eminent domain public or private property located outside the political subdivision's boundaries." This directly affects local governments seeking to acquire land for projects beyond their jurisdictional limits. The law creates a clear restriction on eminent domain use, overriding prior allowances that permitted such acquisitions outside boundaries.