Rep. Travis Ismay

Maddy summaryHB 1162 adds 59 specific substances - including synthetic opioids like "W-18" and "butonitazene," as well as compounds such as "methiopropamine" - to South Dakota's Schedule I controlled substances list. This means these substances are now classified as having no medical use and a high potential for abuse under state law. The bill directly affects anyone in South Dakota who possesses, distributes, or uses these listed substances, making such actions illegal without specific exemptions. The key mechanism is the explicit inclusion of these chemical compounds (including isomers and salts) into Schedule I, closing potential legal gaps for enforcement.

Maddy summaryHB 1169 classifies medetomidine - a drug used in veterinary medicine - as a state-controlled substance under Schedule III, effective January 1, 2026. This bill directly affects veterinarians, animal drug manufacturers, and pharmacists who handle medetomidine for animal use. The key provision exempts specific veterinary applications, including federally approved animal drugs (under 21 U.S.C. § 360b) and uses permitted by federal law, ensuring continued access for animal care while imposing state-level controls on other uses.

Maddy summaryHB 1261 provides a property tax credit for homeowners of single-family residences in South Dakota, reducing their 2027 property tax bills by up to $500 or the full tax amount owed, whichever is lower. The credit applies automatically to tax bills sent by county treasurers for owner-occupied homes. To fund the credit, $120 million is reallocated from the housing infrastructure fund ($60 million) and the general fund/budget reserve ($60 million each), with the state treasurer transferring funds to cover the revenue loss. This policy directly affects single-family homeowners paying property taxes in 2027, while the funding mechanism ensures no new state revenue is required.

Maddy summaryHB 1065 would require individuals facing cannabis-related charges to possess a registry identification card to use a legal defense claiming they are permitted to possess cannabis. Currently, South Dakota law does not mandate this card for such defenses, but the bill would amend § 34-20G-53 to make it a requirement. This change would directly affect people charged with cannabis offenses who attempt to rely on this specific defense in court. The bill creates a new condition for accessing this defense, requiring the card as a prerequisite for its use.

Maddy summarySB 91 clarifies the process for citizens to request changes to a county's comprehensive plan or zoning ordinances by setting specific deadlines. It requires county commissioners to hold a public hearing within 45 days of receiving a petition, and mandates the county planning commission to review the request and provide a recommendation within 45 days of the petition's submission. This bill directly affects residents, property owners, and local government officials by streamlining the petition process and ensuring timely responses. The key mechanism adds clear timeframes to existing procedures, reducing delays in reviewing land-use change requests. The bill focuses solely on procedural timing, not on the substance of zoning decisions.

Maddy summaryThis South Dakota resolution urges federal lawmakers to support the Opportunities for Fairness in Farming Act (S. 1848/H.R. 3516), which aims to reform the federal beef checkoff program. It highlights concerns about the current program’s lack of transparency, conflicts of interest, and its impact on cattle producers, including declining U.S. cow numbers and increased meatpacking concentration. The resolution specifically calls for reforms requiring producer votes on program decisions, independent audits by USDA, and restrictions on contracts with groups influencing policy. These changes would directly affect cattle producers who pay the mandatory checkoff fee, aiming to make the program more accountable to farmers.

Maddy summaryHB 1317 removes a 10% annual cap on how much South Dakota counties and municipalities can increase property taxes using accumulated unused index factors. Currently, local governments could only raise taxes based on these factors up to the prior three years' total or 10%, whichever was lower. The bill eliminates the 10% limit, allowing them to use all accumulated unused index factors from prior years without this restriction. This directly affects local governments' ability to adjust property tax revenue annually. The change modifies how county auditors calculate annual tax revenue limits under state law.

Maddy summarySB 109 modifies South Dakota's rules for creating tax increment financing (TIF) districts, which are areas where increased property tax revenue from development is used to fund improvements. The bill requires that at least 50% of a district's area must be designated as "blighted" (meeting specific criteria like deteriorated structures or unsafe conditions) or serve economic development purposes. It also adds new consent requirements: counties need municipal approval to create districts within city limits, and municipalities need county approval for districts in unincorporated areas. The bill clarifies the definition of "blighted area" to include factors like substandard structures, inadequate infrastructure, or safety hazards. These changes directly affect local governments (municipalities and counties) seeking to establish TIF districts for redevelopment projects.

Maddy summaryHB 1210 bans employers, schools, state agencies, and other entities from requiring COVID-19 vaccinations as a condition for employment, enrollment, or accessing services. It directly affects workers, students, and individuals seeking public benefits or services. Violating this ban would result in a Class 2 misdemeanor penalty. The law overrides existing requirements and takes effect immediately upon enactment.

Maddy summaryThis bill (HB 1324) does not actually abolish the State Board of Elections, as its title claims. Instead, it amends South Dakota law regarding petition requirements for constitutional amendments and initiated measures. The bill specifies detailed formatting rules for petition documents (e.g., 14-point font for text, designated election dates) and requires petition sponsors to submit materials to the Secretary of State, not the State Board of Elections. It also mandates circulator handouts containing specific information about petition sponsors and circulator status. The bill directly affects individuals and groups seeking to place constitutional amendments or initiated measures on the ballot.