Issue · Housing

Housing (Property Development)

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in Oklahoma, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Dana Prieto
100% support rate
Top opponent
Aaron Reinhardt
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving property development in Oklahoma

Legislators moving property development in Oklahoma
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Dana Prieto
Dana Prieto Senate · District 34
R
Strong +
100% 4
George Burns
George Burns Senate · District 5
R
Strong +
100% 3
Kendal Sacchieri
Kendal Sacchieri Senate · District 43
R
Strong +
83% 6
Brian Guthrie
Brian Guthrie Senate · District 25
R
Strong +
80% 5
Dusty Deevers
Dusty Deevers Senate · District 32
R
Strong +
80% 5
Aaron Reinhardt
Aaron Reinhardt Senate · District 37
R
Strong −
0% 3
Ally Seifried
Ally Seifried Senate · District 2
R
Strong −
0% 3
Carri Hicks
Carri Hicks Senate · District 40
D
Strong −
0% 3
Danny Sterling
Danny Sterling House · District 27
R
Strong −
0% 3
Darcy Jech
Darcy Jech Senate · District 26
R
Strong −
0% 3
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All housing bills

signed · Oklahoma · Senate Apr 20, 2026

SB 2060: Improvement districts; master development districts; requirements and procedures; bonds. Effective date.

SB 2060 updates Oklahoma's rules for creating "master development districts" (large-scale projects like new communities or commercial areas) that operate independently from cities. It requires 100% written consent from all surface property owners in the proposed district and sets a minimum threshold of either 250 acres or $250 million in projected private investment to qualify. The bill establishes independent boards of supervisors to govern these districts, granting them authority to make public improvements like streets, utilities, parks, flood control, and recreational facilities using district bonds. It also clarifies bond issuance rules for these districts under Section 39-115. This directly affects property owners within proposed districts and city planners developing large infrastructure projects.
in committee · Oklahoma · House Mar 5, 2026

HB 3968: Eminent domain; defining term; limiting the use of eminent domain; statutory references; effective date.

HB 3968 restricts Oklahoma's use of eminent domain by defining "public use" narrowly to exclude economic development (such as increased tax revenue, jobs, or general economic growth). It prohibits local governments from expanding eminent domain powers without specific state law and bans using economic benefits as justification for taking private property. The bill also requires that if condemned land isn't used for its intended public purpose, it must be offered back to the original owner at fair market value before resale. This applies to all government entities, including cities and counties, and takes effect November 1, 2026.
in committee · Oklahoma · House Feb 4, 2025

HB 1233: Eminent domain; defining term; limiting the use of eminent domain; conforming language; effective date.

HB 1233 limits Oklahoma's use of eminent domain by defining "public use" to include only specific purposes: public roads, buildings, utilities, blighted property remediation, or abandoned properties. It explicitly prohibits governments from taking private property solely for economic development goals like boosting tax revenue, jobs, or general economic growth. The bill requires just compensation for any taking and prevents local governments from expanding eminent domain powers without specific state authorization. This law amends Oklahoma statutes and takes effect November 1, 2025.
in committee · Oklahoma · House Feb 4, 2025

HB 2290: Eminent domain; defining term; limiting the use of eminent domain; conforming language; effective date.

HB 2290 restricts when Oklahoma governments can take private property through eminent domain. It prohibits using eminent domain for general economic development (like boosting tax revenue or jobs), limiting it only to specific public uses: public highways, utilities, blighted property remediation, or abandoned property. The bill also requires that if condemned land isn’t used for its intended purpose, it must be offered back to the original owner at appraised value before resale. This directly affects property owners (by adding protections) and governments (by narrowing their eminent domain authority).