Key legislators
Who's moving energy in Oklahoma
Showing 21–23 of 23
bills
All energy bills
HB 2747 allows Oklahoma electric utilities regulated by the Corporation Commission to recover specific costs through rate adjustments. It creates mechanisms for utilities to seek recovery of costs for: (1) transmission upgrades supporting wind generation (approved by Southwest Power Pool before 2013), (2) capital expenditures needed to comply with environmental laws (like Clean Air Act), and (3) new generation facilities or power contracts after considering reasonable alternatives through competitive bidding. The bill requires the Corporation Commission to review these cost recovery requests within set timelines (180-240 days) and mandates a rate review within 24 months of cost recovery initiation. This directly affects regulated utilities and impacts electricity rates for Oklahoma consumers.
HB 1737, the "Natural Gas Utility Infrastructure Cost Recovery Act of 2025," allows natural gas utilities to seek pre-approval from Oklahoma's Corporation Commission for constructing or investing in energy infrastructure (like natural gas systems, renewable natural gas, hydrogen, or carbon capture facilities). If approved as serving the "public interest" (e.g., improving reliability, creating jobs, or environmental benefits), utilities can recover these costs through customer rates. The bill requires the Commission to approve or deny applications within 240 days and limits cost recovery to 10% above approved amounts, with excess costs reviewed later. It also mandates the Commission to create rules for cost assessments related to staff and legal reviews, effective November 1, 2025.
HB 1989 modifies Oklahoma's wind farm setback requirements by allowing landowners to waive minimum distance rules between turbines and properties through direct agreement with wind farm operators. The bill specifically applies to landowners in affected counties and changes the existing setback restrictions for wind energy projects. Key provisions include adding "in an affected county" to the bill's language and enabling landowners to consent to relaxed setback distances via written agreement. This change shifts some decision-making power to landowners while maintaining the requirement for written consent from both parties.