Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Oklahoma, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
78
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Arturo Alonso
100% support rate
Top opponent
Ross Ford
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving courts in Oklahoma

Legislators moving courts in Oklahoma
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Arturo Alonso
Arturo Alonso House · District 89
D
Strong +
100% 4
Ellen Pogemiller
Ellen Pogemiller House · District 88
D
Strong +
100% 4
Jared Deck
Jared Deck House · District 44
D
Strong +
100% 4
Michelle McCane
Michelle McCane House · District 72
D
Strong +
100% 4
Trish Ranson
Trish Ranson House · District 34
D
Strong +
100% 4
Ross Ford
Ross Ford House · District 76
R
Strong −
0% 5
Chris Sneed
Chris Sneed House · District 14
R
Strong −
0% 4
Cody Maynard
Cody Maynard House · District 21
R
Strong −
0% 4
David Smith
David Smith House · District 18
R
Strong −
0% 4
Denise Crosswhite Hader
Denise Crosswhite Hader House · District 41
R
Strong −
0% 4
Showing 51–60 of 78 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 624: Searches and seizures; prohibiting certain court orders; providing exceptions; requiring notice; specifying factors for determining punitive damages. Effective date.

SB 624 prohibits Oklahoma government entities from seeking or using "reverse-keyword" court orders (requiring data on people who searched specific terms/websites) or "reverse-location" court orders (requiring location data for unspecified devices in an area). It also bans government requests for such data without a court order. The bill requires government entities to notify individuals if their data was improperly obtained, and allows affected people to sue for $1,000 per violation or actual damages, plus punitive damages based on factors like targeting protected activities. This directly affects state/local governments and individuals whose digital data might be improperly collected under broad surveillance methods.
Sub-Topics Courts
vetoed · Oklahoma · House May 29, 2025

HB 2131: Criminal procedure; procedures for advising grand juries; transcripts; hearings; witnesses; effective date.

HB 2131 amends Oklahoma's criminal procedure laws to clarify rules for grand jury operations and handling of transcripts. It restricts who can advise grand juries (prohibiting district attorneys from advising during investigations of their own office), requires sealed court proceedings for transcript requests, and bans using grand jury transcripts in unrelated civil cases. The bill directly affects defense attorneys, prosecutors, witnesses, and judges by limiting transcript access to only criminal proceedings related to the original grand jury investigation. Key provisions include strict penalties for unauthorized disclosure (misdemeanor or contempt) and requiring the prosecutor to be notified before any transcript is released. The law takes effect November 1, 2025.
Sub-Topics Courts
in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 26, 2026

SB 1372: Probation; permitting certain offenders to receive completion and education credits under certain circumstances. Effective date.

SB 1372 allows eligible Oklahoma probationers to shorten their probation term by earning credits. Offenders who complete their first year of probation or earn a high school diploma, college degree, or vocational certificate can receive credits equal to 1/4 of their probation length. Supervising agencies must track these credits, notify offenders annually about their projected termination date, and inform courts when credits qualify for early termination. The bill excludes those convicted of certain serious offenses (like specific sex crimes or violent felonies) and allows offenders who complete education after probation ends to file a court motion for credit reduction.
in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 3, 2026

SB 1321: Searches and seizures; prohibiting certain court orders; providing exceptions; requiring notice; specifying factors for determining punitive damages. Effective date.

SB 1321 prohibits Oklahoma government entities from seeking or using "reverse-keyword" court orders (requiring disclosure of people who searched specific terms online) or "reverse-location" court orders (requiring location data of unspecified devices). It also bans government requests for such data without a court order, with strict penalties for violations. Individuals whose data is improperly collected can sue for $1,000 per violation or actual damages, plus punitive damages based on factors like the number of people affected and whether constitutional rights were targeted. The bill makes illegally obtained data inadmissible in court and allows victims to recover attorney fees. It takes effect November 1, 2026.
Sub-Topics Courts Tags Civil Liberties
died · Oklahoma · House Feb 5, 2025

HB 1109: Truancy; prohibiting detention for failure to attend school; waiver of certain fines; requiring written notice for certain absences; requiring school districts to create and adopt progressive truancy intervention plans; prohibiting suspension; permitting report of absences to court under certain circumstances; effective date; emergency.

HB 1109 prohibits detaining students for school absences and bans suspensions for truancy. It requires school districts to create progressive intervention plans (with three tiers) and send written notices to families for absences, replacing punitive measures. The bill also limits court involvement by allowing reports of absences only under specific circumstances and prevents placing students in institutional facilities solely for truancy. These changes directly affect students, schools, and juvenile courts in Oklahoma, shifting focus from punishment to support systems for attendance issues.
in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 973: Debt collection; prohibiting certain contract with private debt collectors. Effective date.

SB 973 prohibits Oklahoma courts and state entities from contracting with private debt collectors to collect criminal fines, fees, costs, or restitution owed by individuals. This directly affects courts, state agencies handling collections, and private debt collection companies that previously managed these payments. The bill’s key provision, added to Oklahoma law, bans such contracts without altering existing court cost structures for criminal cases. It repeals related sections of law (19 O.S. §§ 514.4-514.5) that governed court cost compliance programs. The law aims to keep collection of criminal justice debts within public systems, not private contractors.
Sub-Topics Courts Victims' Rights
in committee · Oklahoma · House Feb 4, 2025

HB 1913: Criminal procedure; prohibiting reverse-location or reverse-keyword court orders; codification; effective date.

HB 1913 prohibits Oklahoma state government entities from seeking or obtaining location or search history data through "reverse-location" or "reverse-keyword" court orders or requests. It bans government agencies from issuing such orders, requiring courts to reject them, and making any data collected this way inadmissible in court. Individuals affected can receive written notice of violations and sue for $1,000 per violation, plus attorney fees, with punitive damages possible for repeated or targeted violations. The law applies to all Oklahoma state and local government actions and takes effect November 1, 2025.
Sub-Topics Courts
in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 154: Restitution; requiring court to prioritize order for restitution to victims. Effective date.

SB 154 requires Oklahoma courts to prioritize ordering restitution payments to crime victims when sentencing defendants convicted of crimes (excluding death penalty cases). The bill amends sentencing guidelines to explicitly state that courts "shall prioritize an order for payments of restitution to the victim to the extent feasible" before considering other sentencing options like community service or fines. It directly affects courts, victims seeking compensation, and defendants required to pay restitution. The key change is a procedural shift in sentencing priorities, ensuring restitution is addressed early in the process without altering existing restitution rates or amounts.
in committee · Oklahoma · House Feb 4, 2025

HB 2058: Protective orders and fees; clarifying those authorized to seek relief under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act; effective date.

HB 2058 clarifies who can seek protective orders under Oklahoma's Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, expanding eligibility to include victims of domestic abuse, stalking, harassment, rape, and other specified crimes, as well as minors or adults acting on behalf of household members. The bill prohibits charging filing fees, service fees, or attorney fees to the person seeking a protective order, regardless of whether the order is granted. It also adds provisions allowing courts to order defendants to make no contact with animals owned by the household and to issue emergency protective orders without requiring prior criminal complaints for certain victims. The bill modifies court fee structures for defendants convicted of crimes but focuses primarily on removing financial barriers for victims seeking protection.
in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 1055: Expungement of records; providing automatic expungements for certain misdemeanor convictions. Effective date.

SB 1055 automatically seals criminal records for certain misdemeanor convictions in Oklahoma after specific waiting periods. It applies to individuals convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors with no subsequent felony convictions, requiring at least 5-10 years to pass since conviction or sentence completion, depending on the offense. The bill creates a "clean slate" process where eligible cases are automatically sealed three years after the law takes effect (subject to funding), without needing court petitions. It excludes violent offenses, sex offenses, and cases involving pending charges. This policy change directly affects Oklahomans with qualifying misdemeanor histories seeking to clear their records.
Sub-Topics Courts
Showing 51 to 60 of 78 bills
Previous 1 5 6 7 8 Next