Maddy summaryAssembly Resolution No. 408 officially commemorates May 1, 2025, as Law Day in the State of New York. This resolution encourages all New Yorkers to reflect on the importance of the rule of law in maintaining democratic institutions and protecting individual rights.
Maddy summaryAssembly Resolution K 400 memorializes Governor Kathy Hochul to proclaim May 3, 2025, as Press Freedom Day in the State of New York. This resolution aims to recognize the importance of freedom of the press and honor journalists.
Maddy summaryThis is a commemorative resolution (not a law) passed by the New York Assembly to observe July 25, 2025, as the 63rd anniversary of Sagamore Hill's designation as a National Historic Site. It directs the Assembly to pause its work on that date to honor the site's significance as Theodore Roosevelt's former home and conservation legacy. The resolution requires sending copies to the National Park Service at Sagamore Hill and local historical/tourism groups. It has no binding effect on policy or funding, serving only as a symbolic recognition.
Maddy summaryThis is a symbolic resolution (Assembly Resolution No. 326) commemorating Holocaust Remembrance Day (Yom HaShoah) in New York State on April 23, 2025. It does not create new laws or affect any individuals or groups; it is purely ceremonial. The resolution asks the New York State Legislature to pause its proceedings on that date to honor the victims of the Holocaust, referencing the historical significance of the genocide and the need for ongoing vigilance against hatred. It includes no policy changes or financial commitments, serving only as a formal observance.
Maddy summaryThis bill is a ceremonial resolution (Assembly Resolution 329) formally recognizing the valedictorians and salutatorians from the Class of 2025 in New York's 13th Assembly District. It lists specific students from multiple school districts within that district and resolves to commend their academic achievements by sending them engrossed copies of the resolution. The bill has no policy impact or funding provisions - its sole purpose is symbolic recognition of student accomplishments. It was introduced and adopted on April 8, 2025.
Maddy summaryThis is a ceremonial resolution (not a law) honoring the Nassau County Police Department (NCPD) for its 100th anniversary in 2025. It formally recognizes the NCPD’s century of service to Nassau County residents and the State of New York, highlighting its history, community partnerships, and commitment to public safety. The resolution has no policy changes or funding provisions - it simply expresses legislative appreciation through a formal written tribute. Copies will be sent to the NCPD Commissioner and relevant law enforcement organizations.
Allows for no fault separation where the relationship between the spouses has broken down irretrievably for a period of at least six months; requires that issues of support and custody or visitation have been resolved.
Maddy summaryThis is a ceremonial resolution (not a bill), asking Governor Hochul to officially recognize March 17-23, 2025, as "Neurodiversity Celebration Week" in New York State. It aims to raise public awareness about neurodiversity - including autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and related conditions - and highlight the strengths of neurodivergent individuals, who face challenges like unemployment and social isolation. The resolution does not create new laws or policies but formally requests the Governor’s proclamation to support existing awareness efforts. It was adopted by the Assembly on March 18, 2025.
Maddy summaryThis is a ceremonial resolution (K 147) requesting Governor Hochul to issue a proclamation designating March 2025 as "Reading Month" in New York State. It cites reading proficiency statistics (e.g., 42% of 4th graders below basic levels) and links literacy to economic stability, but the resolution itself has no legal effect - it only asks the governor to formally recognize the month. The bill was adopted by the Assembly on March 3, 2025.
Maddy summaryThis bill clarifies when courts can issue protective orders to shield jurors' personal information in criminal cases. It allows courts to restrict disclosure of juror names and addresses to anyone except attorneys, if they find good cause to believe a safety threat exists. Courts must consider specific factors like whether the defendant previously harassed jurors, the severity of charges (e.g., large criminal enterprises), or extensive pretrial media coverage. The law directly affects jurors in high-risk criminal trials by prioritizing their safety through concrete, limited disclosure restrictions.
